these 2 ganged up on me in a 3 person game....never attacked each other.........only me.......and did it publically...so they think that is ok.......in my oppinion...that is cheating as much as a secret alliance.......you cant win a 3 person game ever...if it is 2 against one the entire game...........I say it is cheating
Game number 398784
Sameereemas and kugelfang
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Sameereemas and kugelfang
Gary30060
-
freezie
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:18 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Fill out this form...first.
Second, It wasn't secret as far as I can see. Else they would have told their srategies secrectly.
If you were in very strong position from the beggining, it's quite comon that you get ganged up upon. They try to have a chance each, and their only way might be to truce.
They seem to attack each others now, and one of them offered you a truce. I think you should use diplomacy to get out of your bad position.
Third. You obviously used foul language all over, and THAT isn't gonna get you any friends or a good reputation. Try beeing respectful.
Second, It wasn't secret as far as I can see. Else they would have told their srategies secrectly.
If you were in very strong position from the beggining, it's quite comon that you get ganged up upon. They try to have a chance each, and their only way might be to truce.
They seem to attack each others now, and one of them offered you a truce. I think you should use diplomacy to get out of your bad position.
Third. You obviously used foul language all over, and THAT isn't gonna get you any friends or a good reputation. Try beeing respectful.
too late
true...they are attacking each other now.....after I have been virtually eliminated from the game.....voiced my opinion about it..........and am no longer a threat to either one.....so what is the point of playing a 3 person game....if all 2 other people have to do is announce an aliance and take you out..........
Gary30060
-
freezie
- Posts: 3901
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:18 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Somewhere between here and there.
It is true that a truce in a 3 players game isn't the most liked strategy. But it is all by the rules. If you were in a VERY strong position, there is NOTHING to complain about.
Add them on your ignore list if you want, but, unless you fill the form and a multi-hunter agree with you, I see no secret alliance in it.
Also your turn on that game...deadbeating will just scrap your reputation even more than what I can see ( quite a neg. feedback collection you got.)
---Also could be the reason why they ganged up on you, but I am not the one with the authority to say that.
Add them on your ignore list if you want, but, unless you fill the form and a multi-hunter agree with you, I see no secret alliance in it.
Also your turn on that game...deadbeating will just scrap your reputation even more than what I can see ( quite a neg. feedback collection you got.)
---Also could be the reason why they ganged up on you, but I am not the one with the authority to say that.
I didnt say it was a secret alliance
I didnt say it was a secret alliance....just very unfair.........and might as well be cheating when one player has no chance of winning......
Gary30060
-
bcheng1988
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:01 pm
After having reviewed this, I, for one, will be putting Gary30060 on my ignore list.
Edit:
Liar? Or just a very bad memory. Check the chat logs. You accused them of having a secret alliance and started using uncalled for language after they *publicly announced* a common effort to prevent you, the undisputedly strongest player in the game at that time, from winning.
Edit:
Gary30060 wrote:I didnt say it was a secret alliance....just very unfair.........and might as well be cheating when one player has no chance of winning......
Liar? Or just a very bad memory. Check the chat logs. You accused them of having a secret alliance and started using uncalled for language after they *publicly announced* a common effort to prevent you, the undisputedly strongest player in the game at that time, from winning.