[CL4] Ph2 Div 1 - Winner: KoRT MVP: Mudfighter

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Great-Ollie
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:53 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Great white north.

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Great-Ollie »

ahunda wrote:KORT, PACK & EMP are through.

IA & AOC battling over 4th spot.


Well congrats Empire and Kort on some well fought games! Se you in the finals. On a side note i am really impressed with Empires play after our clan war. They could have easily just fell apart but they have seemed to come back very strong which may =D> be bad news for us all in the final!
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Leehar »

Thanks Ollie, we've also learnt to recognise you guys as some tough competitors ;)

Also, I'm still not exactly sure how it works, and I probably have no impact on the decision, but I'd like to nominate the following for MVP from Empire (as people who made my organising job so much easier with their brilliant performances :lol: ):

The retiring [player]Dwilhelmi[/player], who's an overall mvp candidate for the second successive year!
12 wins, 4 defeats

The stalwart [player]mudfighter[/player], who's been our silent assassin in steadily going about his business
10 wins (soon to be another with Imperium?!), and only 2 defeats! (I honestly think thats the best WP in the whole league!)

Probably the only other person who can combat our dominating duo, is the the Honourable Head CD, [player]bruceswar[/player], with a 15-5 record :(
show
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by betiko »

Great-Ollie wrote:
ahunda wrote:KORT, PACK & EMP are through.

IA & AOC battling over 4th spot.


Well congrats Empire and Kort on some well fought games! Se you in the finals. On a side note i am really impressed with Empires play after our clan war. They could have easily just fell apart but they have seemed to come back very strong which may =D> be bad news for us all in the final!


mate, I think next round is still not the final; 2 get eliminated and then comes the round 4 which is the final :lol: :lol:
the format is a bit long like that imo..
Image
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by betiko »

Leehar wrote:Thanks Ollie, we've also learnt to recognise you guys as some tough competitors ;)

Also, I'm still not exactly sure how it works, and I probably have no impact on the decision, but I'd like to nominate the following for MVP from Empire (as people who made my organising job so much easier with their brilliant performances :lol: ):

The retiring [player]Dwilhelmi[/player], who's an overall mvp candidate for the second successive year!
12 wins, 4 defeats

The stalwart [player]mudfighter[/player], who's been our silent assassin in steadily going about his business
10 wins (soon to be another with Imperium?!), and only 2 defeats! (I honestly think thats the best WP in the whole league!)

Probably the only other person who can combat our dominating duo, is the the Honourable Head CD, [player]bruceswar[/player], with a 15-5 record :(


the best wp on our end is jghost7 with 9-2 so the best knwon wp is still mudfighter so far! ;)
Image
User avatar
Rodion
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Rodion »

What are the rules for MVP?

Personally, I think it should be winning percentage after you control for a minimum number of games (so that someone with 1 game and 1 win is not awarded for his 100% performance).
User avatar
josko.ri
Posts: 5013
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
Gender: Male

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by josko.ri »

in my opinion, the MVP player needs to play at least 50% of maximal games that he was able to play. in addition, I think Phase 1&2 should be considered together. that said, I think MVP player should be the one with the best winning % among all players who played 24 or more games (of 48 possible).
Image
User avatar
Rodion
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Rodion »

I don't think Phase 1 should be considered as we all played against different opposition.

The 50% of maximum game rules is the one Lindax uses for TLO. That would be 14 out of 28.

Mudfighter would be ineligible with his 11-2, but we could give him a loss to complete the minimum of 14 and have him compete as an 11-3 (78.57% wins). I believe he would still win.
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by lord voldemort »

Lol...his run is ridiculous...the minimum is alot though. I think we would only have 3-4 guys in our whole clan who actually played that many. We spread ours around alot and not rely on 1 or 2 individuals.
Though the general formula of win% after a minimum # of games is good
Image
Chariot of Fire
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Gender: Male
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Chariot of Fire »

It's not really equitable to draw a comparison to the TLO's 50% game rule because the quota restrictions are so different. In the TLO a player can join as many as 6 of the 9 games each round (67%) whereas in the League the restrictions in place are for a maximum of 4 games out of the 12 (33%) and 10 players must be used to encourage greater diversity of participation. On this basis the net should be widened to accommodate those clans who have distributed the games more equitably between their players (but don't ask me what that figure should be). Another concept that proved successful in CL1 was to have a vote. Each clan submits its representative and a poll is created with the players' stats. This can be done in the CLA forum where there is no majority favouring one particular clan.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
Teflon Kris
Posts: 4236
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom

Update

Post by Teflon Kris »

Scores & Table updated.

8-)
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by lord voldemort »

Chariot of Fire wrote:It's not really equitable to draw a comparison to the TLO's 50% game rule because the quota restrictions are so different. In the TLO a player can join as many as 6 of the 9 games each round (67%) whereas in the League the restrictions in place are for a maximum of 4 games out of the 12 (33%) and 10 players must be used to encourage greater diversity of participation. On this basis the net should be widened to accommodate those clans who have distributed the games more equitably between their players (but don't ask me what that figure should be). Another concept that proved successful in CL1 was to have a vote. Each clan submits its representative and a poll is created with the players' stats. This can be done in the CLA forum where there is no majority favouring one particular clan.

Votes can be still biased. Id rather go purely on stats
Image
User avatar
tokle
Posts: 2910
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:11 am

Re: SCORE UPDATE

Post by tokle »

Round 1:
PACK 8-4 TOFU
AOC 5-6 IA
AFOS 5-7 EMP
TSM 5-7 KORT

Round 2:
IA 5-7 PACK
EMP 5-7 TOFU
KORT 7-5 AOC
TSM 4-8 AFOS

Round 3:
PACK 4-8 EMP
IA 4-8 KORT
TOFU 6-6 TSM
AOC 8-4 AFOS

Round 4:
KORT 7-5 PACK
TSM 6-6 EMP
AFOS 5-7 IA
AOC 4-7 TOFU

Round 5:
PACK 4-8 TSM
KORT 5-7 AFOS
EMP 4-8 AOC
IA 8-4 TOFU

Round 6:
AFOS 2-10 PACK
AOC 7-5 TSM
TOFU 6-6 KORT
IA 4-8 EMP

Round 7:
PACK 7-5 AOC
AFOS 6-5 TOFU
TSM 5-7 IA
KORT 6-6 EMP
Last edited by tokle on Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jetsetwilly
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by jetsetwilly »

Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !
Image
lynch5762
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by lynch5762 »

jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


That's hilarious... first game started will probably be the last one finished
Image
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by betiko »

jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


and is it leaning one way now?
Image
User avatar
jetsetwilly
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by jetsetwilly »

betiko wrote:
jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


and is it leaning one way now?


It's taken a heavy tilt in our direction but no fowl on our abacus yet, there have been too many swings already.

Could you have scripted a better finish to this phase than to have 1 game decide which of those 2 clans would take the final spot. (and for those 2 clans to be last year's finalists)
Image
usernamer
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 12:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: England

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by usernamer »

betiko wrote:
jetsetwilly wrote:
Leehar wrote:Conquer Rome is holding us up I think ;)
Can't decide 3rd/4th without it, and it's been going since the first week!


Not only was it the first week, it was the first game created in this division !


and is it leaning one way now?


Yeah, it's looking like a reasonably sure AOC victory now.
Hats off to IA for putting up an awesome fight. Great game. Loved it :)
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by betiko »

congrats to AOC then! kort-pack-empire-AOC for phase 3 then!

when is it schedueled?
Image
User avatar
jetsetwilly
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by jetsetwilly »

betiko wrote:congrats to AOC then! kort-pack-empire-AOC for phase 3 then!

when is it schedueled?


Thanks Betiko.

Same question, to the organisers, when will we get the phase 3 timeline ?
Image
Great-Ollie
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:53 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Great white north.

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Great-Ollie »

What is really funny about this is that if we all played the same series again i bet AFOS, TSM, IA, and TOFU would probably be moving on! It all came down to some luck for most of us advancing, well done, and i hope we can remain lucky for the finals! :lol: =D>
User avatar
jetsetwilly
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:31 am
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by jetsetwilly »

Great-Ollie wrote:What is really funny about this is that if we all played the same series again i bet AFOS, TSM, IA, and TOFU would probably be moving on! It all came down to some luck for most of us advancing, well done, and i hope we can remain lucky for the finals! :lol: =D>


Yeah, there's clearly very little between any of the top 8, it's great that we have such a large group of competitive clans.
Image
EagleByRob
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:15 am
Gender: Male

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by EagleByRob »

Game 10927118 - game is over --- finally! gg all
User avatar
Swifte
Posts: 2474
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: usually Mahgreb

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Swifte »

Well played guys. Congrats to all those advancing. This was a fun event!
Dako
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Gender: Male
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
Contact:

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Dako »

Just some 29 rounds. :)
Image
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: [CL4] Phase Two - Division 1

Post by Leehar »

At least we can be relieved a 30 round limit would have been useless ;)
show
Post Reply

Return to “Complete Challenges”