natty dread wrote:
Oh wait, you defend pedophiles and probably are one - never mind.
That's a pretty strong accusation.
natty, believing you argue for the sake of arguing is the only way I can understand your actions.
You go thread over thread looking for something to argue against anyone and manipulate and misintepretate what others are saying into making them dirty. Like you just did with tgd for disagreeing with you.
If you are not trolling, which I can understand, then I don't understand you.
You want me to make a compilation of your threads showing how you accuse of logical fallacies only to fall to them in your next post?
Nobody had any intention of talking of pedophile here, the whole matter was rather innocent, it was a coincidence that the age of the girl surfaced, it was you that came with all the accusations, we only got bothered with your accusations and responded.
You need to relax natty.
But I agree this thread is not for this discussion, so if you want to continue we can, jut in another place.
