One time in an assassin game, the other guy was about to eliminate his target. He had a 7 and I had a 5. I attacked him thinking I could weaken him enough so he couldn't take out his target. I ended up winning.
Best Luck Ever
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
- wrightfan123
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Looking over every baseball team's schedule to try to determine who will win the World Series.
- Contact:
Best Luck Ever
Have you ever had a time when you win a roll or game against unbelivable odds? Well post them here.
One time in an assassin game, the other guy was about to eliminate his target. He had a 7 and I had a 5. I attacked him thinking I could weaken him enough so he couldn't take out his target. I ended up winning.
One time in an assassin game, the other guy was about to eliminate his target. He had a 7 and I had a 5. I attacked him thinking I could weaken him enough so he couldn't take out his target. I ended up winning.
I went from having one army on one territory to winning the game 2 rounds later. that was fun, of course it was escalating.
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=325955
but still fun.
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=325955
but still fun.
- alex_white101
- Posts: 1992
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am
jaydog wrote:one time in a Real time game, Trestasin was wiping the board with all of us, my only chance was to attempt a major upset to get his cards
i had 43 to take 56 or so and one with a final one on one, i went on to win the game.
Winning 43 vs. 56 is actually not that unlikely. The attacker has some advantage over the defender and with increasing number of armies, the odds grow stronger that the attacker wins (even when he has a little less number of armies than the opponent).
Assuming just one country is involved, it is 26% chance of success. The odds decrease significantly if those armies are spread out over several countries (as I assume they were). For instance, if they were 2 countries with 22 on each and 12 with one army, the odds go down to 5%.Jafnhár wrote:jaydog wrote:one time in a Real time game, Trestasin was wiping the board with all of us, my only chance was to attempt a major upset to get his cards
i had 43 to take 56 or so and one with a final one on one, i went on to win the game.
Winning 43 vs. 56 is actually not that unlikely. The attacker has some advantage over the defender and with increasing number of armies, the odds grow stronger that the attacker wins (even when he has a little less number of armies than the opponent).
- SirSebstar
- Posts: 6969
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
- Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011
here is one that was lucky...
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=352688
Red had 14 armies, conquered 8 countries, lost 0 armies...go figure
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=352688
Red had 14 armies, conquered 8 countries, lost 0 armies...go figure
detlef wrote:Assuming just one country is involved, it is 26% chance of success. The odds decrease significantly if those armies are spread out over several countries (as I assume they were). For instance, if they were 2 countries with 22 on each and 12 with one army, the odds go down to 5%.Jafnhár wrote:jaydog wrote:one time in a Real time game, Trestasin was wiping the board with all of us, my only chance was to attempt a major upset to get his cards
i had 43 to take 56 or so and one with a final one on one, i went on to win the game.
Winning 43 vs. 56 is actually not that unlikely. The attacker has some advantage over the defender and with increasing number of armies, the odds grow stronger that the attacker wins (even when he has a little less number of armies than the opponent).
All right, I didn't notice that this wasn't a 1 vs. 1 fight.
- joeyjordison
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:10 am
joeyjordison wrote:i once won a game cos i was down to my final territory and i had 1 on it. the other guy had 6 or 7 i think and failed to kill me. i then cashed really high and pretty much wiped him and won next turn. that was really hard luck on him cos overall he came out down about 19 armies
... and this is why I don't play escalating games.
Some guy had 43v30 attacking me, soon it was 1v6. Another time I had 13 guys and didn't lose one for about 10 rolls.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fallenepitaph = My photos.
I love my little XT/350D/Kiss N.
I love my little XT/350D/Kiss N.
draca wrote:Psilocbin, u the stuipedest person on here at the moment....
- SkyCaptain
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:06 pm
- Location: The World of Tomorrow
- ijnmusashi
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 5:03 pm
- Location: Building my Next RC Battleship
- Contact:
- iAnonymous
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:17 pm
- Location: Lower Mainland, BC
- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
