F400 Ranking [Updated 07-01-12]

Abandoned challenges and other old information.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Keefie
Clan Director
Clan Director
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sleepy Hollow

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Keefie »

Indeed quite a lot of the 'no changes' have changed.
Image
User avatar
Sniper08
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:58 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dublin,Ireland

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Sniper08 »

Swifte wrote:should check your +/- column... even after adjusting for removing THOTA it seems we (IA) should be +1 for passing AOC?


yea same here Pack went from 6th to 2nd yet it says we only went up +3

thx gunn for keeping up with the rankings.
Image
User avatar
Swifte
Posts: 2474
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: usually Mahgreb

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Swifte »

Sniper08 wrote:
Swifte wrote:should check your +/- column... even after adjusting for removing THOTA it seems we (IA) should be +1 for passing AOC?


yea same here Pack went from 6th to 2nd yet it says we only went up +3

thx gunn for keeping up with the rankings.


I assume Pack is only +3 because of an adjustment for the removal of THOTA, but I could be wrong. Otherwise every clan that was previously below THOTA would have shown up as +1 even if there was no change... however it doesn't seem like the adjustment worked everywhere? guess we need to hear from Gunn what the real intent was.
User avatar
MudPuppy
Posts: 2091
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:50 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by MudPuppy »

Based on the ratings, it looks like:
  • LHDD & FOED should be tied for 10th;
  • BOTFM, DYN, & ID should be tied for 12th;
  • LOW should be in 15th;
  • GR & TFFS should be tied for 22nd;
  • G1 should be in 25th; and
  • AOD & TLW should be tied for 32nd
Image
User avatar
IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 16847
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by IcePack »

I still don't see KOA vs TFFS?
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 16847
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by IcePack »

IcePack wrote:I still don't see KOA vs TFFS?


KOZ TFFS 28 23 04/08/12

Wrong abbreviation, needs to be corrected to count. KOA*
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
hotfire
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by hotfire »

the 11 thru 16 rank area looks labeled wrong
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Leehar »

hotfire wrote:the 11 thru 16 rank area looks labeled wrong

Again, thats the whole Thota thing. A line was removed, but unfortunately the results weren't auto-corrected.
See what happens when the Dispatch doesn't release it first! 8-)
(jk)
show
User avatar
Gunn217
Posts: 782
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bay of Pigs

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Gunn217 »

I told you to let me know if you wanted it, Leehar. I'm not going to do it early and do a column on it if you aren't going to use it.

The +/- column rarely works right. If I go back and change something or correct something it scews the +/- so it really should be eliminated entirely. Just look at the previous month.

If the numbers are incorrect, I just deleted a whole line instead of just the cells, my mistake. I don't remove defunct clans because it would take forever. I just delete them.
Image
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by benga »

why the 4 way war isn't accounted for????
User avatar
Gunn217
Posts: 782
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bay of Pigs

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Gunn217 »

Should be corrected now.
Image
User avatar
josko.ri
Posts: 5013
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:18 pm
Gender: Male

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by josko.ri »

I think you have one mistake with KORT, best beat in 1 Year is 1418 TSM, and not 1351 EMP.

For me it is weird that KORT's beat TSM 35-25 lead to point loose from 1436 to 1400. but I know you do not know about how ranking works, you just put database into the scoring system frame. Did you deleted THOTA results? if you did, that may be reason. rankings works correct if all results are there, even the ones who are retired, because it affects score of clans who played vs them.

I also regret that CL4 phase 1 results counted on 1st April, not at least 1 day before. if it was included in March rankings, then the Draw for CC3 would be much more reliable on current rankings than it is now. as we did not have it included, and majority of May rankings changes are from CL4, it now happens that #1,2,3 are on the same side of draw, and #2,3 meet each other early in quarterfinals.

Thanks Gunn for keeping this updated ;)
Image
betiko
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: location, location

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by betiko »

second? woot woot!!! things are tight from 2nd to 6th and kort is way ahead on first place..
Image
User avatar
Gunn217
Posts: 782
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bay of Pigs

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Gunn217 »

I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.
Image
User avatar
Bruceswar
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Bruceswar »

Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
Chariot of Fire
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Gender: Male
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Chariot of Fire »

Bruceswar wrote:
Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.


A PM went out to all clans asking whether KORT should be handicapped or not and by how many points. The highest & lowest figures were discarded and a mean average taken of the remainder. Some felt you should be given points, the majority felt you should be docked them.

This is a new monthly procedure for the gratification of all participating clans.
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
User avatar
Bruceswar
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Bruceswar »

Chariot of Fire wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.


A PM went out to all clans asking whether KORT should be handicapped or not and by how many points. The highest & lowest figures were discarded and a mean average taken of the remainder. Some felt you should be given points, the majority felt you should be docked them.

This is a new monthly procedure for the gratification of all participating clans.



LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
Chariot of Fire
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Gender: Male
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Chariot of Fire »

.;).
Image
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
lynch5762
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by lynch5762 »

Bruceswar wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.


A PM went out to all clans asking whether KORT should be handicapped or not and by how many points. The highest & lowest figures were discarded and a mean average taken of the remainder. Some felt you should be given points, the majority felt you should be docked them.

This is a new monthly procedure for the gratification of all participating clans.



LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:


Did you not get the memo Brucey? I imagine that many items pass your desk now as the HCD.. :twisted:
Image
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Leehar »

Bruceswar wrote:
Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.

More likely because your win over thota counted more last year and because it's also passed the year mark it's weighting got halved?
show
Foxglove
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Foxglove »

Leehar wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.

More likely because your win over thota counted more last year and because it's also passed the year mark it's weighting got halved?


Stop being so reasonable, Leehar - I much prefer CoF's explanation. :)
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Leehar »

Foxglove wrote:
Leehar wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Gunn217 wrote:I thought the same thing,Josko, so I don't delete anyone front the database. I remove the defunct clans from the final ranking. I have zero idea how it tabulates what the best showing for the last year is. To me, it's unimportant.



Can you then explain who we lost points after beating the then number 2 clan by a pretty good margin? Not that it matters, but would be nice to know.

More likely because your win over thota counted more last year and because it's also passed the year mark it's weighting got halved?


Stop being so reasonable, Leehar - I much prefer CoF's explanation. :)

I'm sure it still applies to the Power Rankings ;)
show
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by benga »

Can we get this war in the standings?
viewtopic.php?f=442&t=159827
MB(22) v OSA(31) v HH(27) v TNC(28)
User avatar
Keefie
Clan Director
Clan Director
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sleepy Hollow

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by Keefie »

Benga,

I think Chemefreak warned us that it probably wouldn't be entered into the rankings.
Image
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: F400 Ranking [Updated 05-01-12]

Post by benga »

Keefie wrote:Benga,

I think Chemefreak warned us that it probably wouldn't be entered into the rankings.


So why is then CL in the rankings?
Post Reply

Return to “Clan Archives”