[Official] First Trench Warfare Tournament [nolefan5311]

[uk massive]

oh yes in please

[Gilligan]

Lookin' for 9 more.

[Culs De Sac]

In pls

[CoopClaret]

in please

[agentcom]

I didn't notice that it was unlimited forts until someone pointed it out a few pages ago. Not sure that's the best setting.

I agree with those that have spoken up about round limits. Not really sure how that will play out with a 6 person game. If the winner is clear by round 20, then fine. But I'm not sure this will be the case. Perhaps you should do round 1 at a 30 round limit but reserve the right to change it to 20 for subsequent rounds.

Finally, you should revise the scoring to make it more fair between people who are in 6 and 5 player groups. Right now the players that get assigned to 5 player groups are at a disadvantage. Total points awarded/Players should be equal in both groups. Unless, I'm not thinking of something that seems to be the fairest way of doing things.

What I would actually do if I was running this is just be sure you get enough players to divide evenly by 6. You don't seem to be having problems getting sign-ups, so you'll probably have some reserves.

[Gilligan]

I didn't notice that it was unlimited forts until someone pointed it out a few pages ago. Not sure that's the best setting.

I agree with those that have spoken up about round limits. Not really sure how that will play out with a 6 person game. If the winner is clear by round 20, then fine. But I'm not sure this will be the case. Perhaps you should do round 1 at a 30 round limit but reserve the right to change it to 20 for subsequent rounds.

Finally, you should revise the scoring to make it more fair between people who are in 6 and 5 player groups. Right now the players that get assigned to 5 player groups are at a disadvantage. Total points awarded/Players should be equal in both groups. Unless, I'm not thinking of something that seems to be the fairest way of doing things.

What I would actually do if I was running this is just be sure you get enough players to divide evenly by 6. You don't seem to be having problems getting sign-ups, so you'll probably have some reserves.

I will send a PM to everyone about changing the limit to thirty rounds. As far as forts, I could change it to chained but I thought unlimited would be better for more options in succeeding rounds.

As far as scoring - it's either or. Either all games will be 5 players or 6 players. I didn't want to set anything on stone as I didn't know what the outcome would be like.

[Gabriel13]

In please

[centac]

in please

[machrs]

in please

[uckuki]

how about skipping some of the largest maps,
like Hive or World 2.1?

setting/round limit doesn't seem practical for
large maps.

[dazza2008]

In please.

[IR1SH ACE]

looks good.......in please

[Iron Maid]

Count me in!

[nicarus]

in please

[Gilligan]

how about skipping some of the largest maps,
like Hive or World 2.1?

setting/round limit doesn't seem practical for
large maps.

Can't take maps out of random.

[robadrag]

In please.

[hewhoisdum]

In please.

[Vid_FISO]

in please

[stuboy]

In please

[Beer Baron]

in please

[redhedge47]

im in

[biglou816]

I'm in!

[Mr. Gix]

in plZ

[redhawk92]

please remove me from this,

sorry just have things to do

[danalan]

To late to get in? THanks.