Sniper08 wrote:Special Enough? they are the largest players battles available to us and they happen so rarly in a year so they seem very special to me.
greenoaks wrote:winning a BR is not a super achievement. lots of players have done so. some many times.
General Achievement - Awarded to members that won a challenge, contest, or event.
by that logic tournament medals should be stripped and awarded with GA medals, in fact so should nearly every medal we have.
not at all
tournaments, clans and map making have their own forums and get medals specific to the tasks performed there. Battle Royales do not and are covered by the catch-all General Achievement medal.
` everything that doesn't have it's own medal get's a GA medal, that doesn't mean we don't need any new medals.
BR is a special occasion, and it's much more unique then a tournament medal.
I'd suggest something like a "King of the Hill"-type thing. Like maybe the CC star on top of a hill or something?
I mean, think about it - it makes sense with the concept of a Battle Royale; one man stands atop the hill, triumphant, while his enemies wallow in their failure.
I like the coliseum idea. (BTW, why does that word only have 1 "l" and 1 "s"?)
Any idea what the bronze/silver/gold thresholds would be? Considering that the standard medals are at 20/100/400 unique opponents, that would translate to something like 1/2/7. 7 seems like a lot for a gold. It would literally take years for almost everyone. Maybe something a little more moderate like 1/2/4 would be good. I think 4 BR's is worth a gold medal and it adds a significant leap between silver and gold.
I don't understand how 78% is pro this suggestion. We have enough darn medals already! What we need are new functions and better and more userfriendly interface. Not some random crappy medal! That was lack's thing, I hope the new owner doesn't make the same misstakes.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
agentcom wrote:I like the coliseum idea. (BTW, why does that word only have 1 "l" and 1 "s"?)
Any idea what the bronze/silver/gold thresholds would be? Considering that the standard medals are at 20/100/400 unique opponents, that would translate to something like 1/2/7. 7 seems like a lot for a gold. It would literally take years for almost everyone. Maybe something a little more moderate like 1/2/4 would be good. I think 4 BR's is worth a gold medal and it adds a significant leap between silver and gold.
Gillipig wrote:I don't understand how 78% is pro this suggestion. We have enough darn medals already! What we need are new functions and better and more userfriendly interface. Not some random crappy medal! That was lack's thing, I hope the new owner doesn't make the same misstakes.
agentcom wrote:I like the coliseum idea. (BTW, why does that word only have 1 "l" and 1 "s"?)
Any idea what the bronze/silver/gold thresholds would be? Considering that the standard medals are at 20/100/400 unique opponents, that would translate to something like 1/2/7. 7 seems like a lot for a gold. It would literally take years for almost everyone. Maybe something a little more moderate like 1/2/4 would be good. I think 4 BR's is worth a gold medal and it adds a significant leap between silver and gold.
Gillipig wrote:I don't understand how 78% is pro this suggestion. We have enough darn medals already! What we need are new functions and better and more userfriendly interface. Not some random crappy medal! That was lack's thing, I hope the new owner doesn't make the same misstakes.
And followed by a completely wasted post.
That is like your opinion man.
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
