North America 2.0 [Quenched]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- minihaymanz
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 4:45 pm
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
- dragoonfj123
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:45 pm
- DublinDoogey
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
dragoonfj123 wrote:there should be a bonus of one for hold each of north america's countrys capitals
That would be fun, but many of the countries in the map are countries in their own right, so there would be far too many bonuses.
On a more pressing matter...
I've been playing around witht the shrinking of my image. It seriously isn't going good. I shrink it down to 350 pixels in heighth, but then the names are completely illegible. I don't have the room to make them bigger, especially in the small version.
Is there any huge need for a small version? I don't know if it's really possible with a map that is square like this one is.
- DublinDoogey
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
North America, French Canada
I think the map looks very cool and fun! Except people might feel offended about french Canada being its own part it goes back to the whole speratist politician thing.
But other wise very good job just try and find another name for french canada.
But other wise very good job just try and find another name for french canada.
- tomatoman25
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24935
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
- DublinDoogey
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
Yeah, i lost motivation and basically quit trying to get the small to work, someone offered me some tips, but i couldn't get them to work. there's also the fact that there is so much to do in the summer that it's hard to sit at the computer for hours to do something like that...
anyway, if someone wants to do the small picture, cool, i'll do the xml, otherwise it'll be finished eventually
anyway, if someone wants to do the small picture, cool, i'll do the xml, otherwise it'll be finished eventually
- DublinDoogey
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
cramill wrote:I don't know if this is too late to suggest, but seince the small map is still being worked on I assume that one small change can be made. I think Belize should be renamed Guatemala. Guatemala is a larger and more populated, and more important country than Belize.
A good suggestion, but I'm not going to change it because I'm done changing that kinda stuff and because I've always wanted to go to Belize, arbitrary, I know, but that's how it goes.
Thanks though,
-Doogey
-
Stephen9o3
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:58 am
- happysadfun
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
- Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin
Map
Nunuvut is actuallly Nunavut, that's the spellcheck error. And what about replacing Ottawa with Toronto, Horseshoe, G. Horseshoe, or S. Ontario; and Missouri with Illinois. Otherwise, I love it.
- happysadfun
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
- Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin
oops
forget i said the nunavut one, i wasn't completely updated.
- wcaclimbing
- Posts: 5598
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
- Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
- Contact:
Re: Map
happysadfun wrote:And what about replacing ... ...and Missouri with Illinois...
yes
illinois =12,419,293 population
missouri =5,595,211 population
notice missouri has 6,824,082 less people than illinois ( as of 2000)

cramill wrote:I don't know if this is too late to suggest, but seince the small map is still being worked on I assume that one small change can be made. I think Belize should be renamed Guatemala. Guatemala is a larger and more populated, and more important country than Belize.
i support this suggestion and here's why:
Code: Select all
: GUATEMALA : BELIZE
AREA (sq km) : 108,890 : 22,966
POPULATION : 12,974,361 : 256,062
GDP (million US$) : 46,200 : 790Guatemala is a larger (4.74 times), more populated (50.67 times), and economically stronger (58.48 times)country than Belize!!! in addition to that, Belize was a part of Guatemala... naming the territory Belize would be like, in some map, naming the whole ex-sovietic territory Ukraine or Belarus instead of Russia or USSR, just nonsense... so, i still don't see why this territory should be named Belize instead of Guatemala!!! anyone with me??
bottom line: name the territory Guatemala, numbers strongly support that (and numbers don't lie
- tomatoman25
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24935
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
