Homosexuality

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:58 pm

I'm not familiar with which states support it and which don't. What I can assume is that in the states that are against it, it's not from a non-religious interest.

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:59 pm

Aegnor wrote:I'm not familiar with which states support it and which don't. What I can assume is that in the states that are against it, it's not from a non-religious interest.

there are no states that are against it right now :roll:

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:06 pm

usless post that did say something else :roll:

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:07 pm

red bull wrote:
Aegnor wrote:I'm not familiar with which states support it and which don't. What I can assume is that in the states that are against it, it's not from a non-religious interest.
there are no states that are against it right now

Taken from wikipeda: "In contrast [to states that allow it -A.], twenty-six states have constitutional amendments explicitly barring the recognition of same-sex marriage, confining civil marriage to a legal union between a man and a woman. Forty-three states have statutes defining marriage to two persons of the opposite-sex, including some of those that have created legal recognition for same-sex unions under a name other than "marriage.""

You were saying?

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:08 pm

Aegnor wrote:
red bull wrote:
Aegnor wrote:I'm not familiar with which states support it and which don't. What I can assume is that in the states that are against it, it's not from a non-religious interest.
there are no states that are against it right now

Taken from wikipeda: "In contrast [to states that allow it -A.], twenty-six states have constitutional amendments explicitly barring the recognition of same-sex marriage, confining civil marriage to a legal union between a man and a woman. Forty-three states have statutes defining marriage to two persons of the opposite-sex, including some of those that have created legal recognition for same-sex unions under a name other than "marriage.""

You were saying?

name the 26 states :roll:

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:10 pm

Oklahoma and Kansas are two of them.

I live in the buckle of the Bible Belt... I get anti-gay sentiment shoved down my throat all the time.

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:10 pm

red bull wrote: name the 26 states

I gave you the wikipedia link not so you could stare at it like a retard.

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:13 pm

Aegnor wrote:I gave you the wikipedia link not so you could stare at it like a retard.

lol shut up i just read it and it was for CHURCHES to give the documents for marrage they can still be married in courts in most of those states and again it is not out lawed compleatly .......... if it was outlawed they would be in JAIL !!!!

Jesse, Bad Boy · Post by **Jesse, Bad Boy** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:15 pm

I see the 'tards are still retarded. Shit, not much changes in two weeks.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:16 pm

red bull wrote:
Aegnor wrote:I gave you the wikipedia link not so you could stare at it like a retard.
lol shut up i just read it and it was for CHURCHES to give the documents for marrage they can still be married in courts in most of those states and again it is not out lawed compleatly .......... if it was outlawed they would be in JAIL !!!!

How about we turn that around, Red...

What states ALLOW same sex marriages???

At most, you will find three... New Hampshire, New York, and Massachusets.

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:17 pm

lol i just looked back at your post again 26 and 43 ........... add that up :lol:

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:17 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
red bull wrote:
Aegnor wrote:I gave you the wikipedia link not so you could stare at it like a retard.
lol shut up i just read it and it was for CHURCHES to give the documents for marrage they can still be married in courts in most of those states and again it is not out lawed compleatly .......... if it was outlawed they would be in JAIL !!!!

How about we turn that around, Red...

What states ALLOW same sex marriages???

At most, you will find three... New Hampshire, New York, and Massachusets.

anark i am not going to call you a retard beacuse your not but look at the link he gave ...........

red bull · Post by **red bull** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:19 pm

ill pick this conversation up later but right now i have to go to work good day all

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:19 pm

No no no... Show me which states...

See, the problem is... I was right... I don't see how that makes me retarded in any way...

You see that ALL of those other states PROHIBIT it... Not just in churches, but BY LAW.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:21 pm

Aegnor... Here is a better site for your argument, as well..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_m ... s_by_state

Aegnor · Post by **Aegnor** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:40 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:Aegnor... Here is a better site for your argument, as well..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_m ... s_by_state

Thanks anarki.
Btw, arguing with kids is just as unsatisfying as I had imagined.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:40 pm

red bull wrote:ill pick this conversation up later but right now i have to go to work good day all

You feed the hogs at night?

freezie · Post by **freezie** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:46 pm

Whoever say homosexuality is a choice have to get slapped. Whoever say they are different and should be insulted for that should be shot.

Whoever say worse, come see me. I'll take care of you myself.

I have a lesbian friend, and NEVER she chosed that ( though considering the maturity of teenage guys in my school, she would have made the right choice.)

freezie · Post by **freezie** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:52 pm

About if they should have the right to get married or not...

How aren't they humans?!

Why shouldn't they have the right to get married, practice their religion or whatever, from what they are? If I am missing a leg since my birth, would I be allowed to get married anyway? Yes. Why is homosexuality is different.=?

Because some random idiot standed up saying homosexuality is different and should be dished away.

If he would have kept his butt down, I don't think this ''war'' would have happened. People who show hatred to anyone who is different than themself need to wake up and realise EVERYONE is different, with some similarities.

That is one more thing I hate about religion. They show ONCE again their celf-centered position about what THEY say and scrap everything else away. Well, the religion itself. The beleivers have their right to think what they want..but not allowed to say cause of that so called religion. In most case.

--This wasn't meant to offense anyone practicing religion.

DirtyDishSoap · Post by **DirtyDishSoap** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:16 pm

Aegnor wrote:
red bull wrote:
Aegnor wrote:I'm not familiar with which states support it and which don't. What I can assume is that in the states that are against it, it's not from a non-religious interest.
there are no states that are against it right now

Taken from wikipeda: "In contrast [to states that allow it -A.], twenty-six states have constitutional amendments explicitly barring the recognition of same-sex marriage, confining civil marriage to a legal union between a man and a woman. Forty-three states have statutes defining marriage to two persons of the opposite-sex, including some of those that have created legal recognition for same-sex unions under a name other than "marriage.""

You were saying?

Either the KKK or some other hill billy orginization

johnnyrotten · Post by **johnnyrotten** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:31 pm

Hitman079 wrote:and there could also be the possibility that it is a choice- most people do not become "gay" until later in their life, maybe from failure with women, and it may not be a gene.

Only just read the start of this thread, so this might have been said before, but I think gay people don't 'become' gay, they're just born with it, and either through not being able to hide it by getting a girlfriend or just through wanting to admit it, come out when they're an adult. I know for sure that if I was gay I wouldn't want to admit it when I was still at school. And anyone who 'went gay' due to failure with women still wouldn't be actually gay, just someone who was desperate for a bit.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:34 pm

A gay man who gets married has what we call a 'beard'

He's still always been attracted to men, and always will be...

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:50 pm

Hitman when it comes to when I am screwed, yet I am not gay...

ParadiceCity9 · Post by **ParadiceCity9** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:20 pm

its kinda both...

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:03 am

Anarkistsdream wrote:A gay man who gets married has what we call a 'beard'

Um . . . couldn't you use another metaphor?

Homosexuality

Where does homosexuality come from?

Re: Homosexuality