I've just finished round 9, in just a couple of days, so each round is fast.
But of course, if it drags on too long, it would be possible to base more rounds on random maps. That way those who are more alround would get the edge, I think.
I do prefer the current setup, though.
Roy
knubbel wrote:knubbel wrote:Some stats:
Players
round1: 2507
round2: 2057 -> 82% of round1
round3: 1687 -> 82% of round2
round4: 1398 -> 83% of round3
round5: 1147 -> 82% of round4
round6: 932 -> 81% of round5
round7: 776 -> 83% of round6
so about 82% advancing each round.
if we continue like that the winner will be found in round x:
2507*0,82^(x-1)=1
x=ln(1/2507)/ln(0,82)+1= 40,43
We already played 7 rounds, so we just have to play more or less 33 rounds to find the winner
round8: 642 -> 82,73% of round7
round9: 543 -> 84,58% of round8
so maybe a few more rounds?
9618376
