Map requiring least amount of luck?

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
User avatar
mysticbell
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:30 pm
Gender: Female

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by mysticbell »

Halloween Hallows
Freestyle
Manual
Escalating Spoils
No Fog of War
jleonnn
Posts: 1808
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:11 am
Gender: Male
Location: The Communist Republic of Aoria

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by jleonnn »

Alright, thanks guys! :D
User avatar
Augustus Maximus
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:17 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Augustus Maximus »

I don't think there are any maps where luck isn't a at least 25% of how the game turns out. I have seen far too many games where no matter how good the strategy is, another player's good luck completely undo it.
nebsmith
Posts: 559
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:25 am
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by nebsmith »

8 player singles on Hive. auto, seq, fog, adj, not escalating.
Image
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Qwert »

supprised? wow these is another for QUESTION AND ANSWER ,or even maybe STRATEGY Forum?
Dillema where to move?
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Wolffystyle
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 10:01 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Wolffystyle »

nebsmith wrote:8 player singles on Hive. auto, seq, fog, adj, not escalating.

Sounds like an awful game!

Also with specific regards to spoils--> no spoils is the most luck-interdependent. Flat Rate is the most luck-affected, though one could make an argument for nukes. Heck, even with escalating games- you gotta hope for the right color card at the right moment or for the right play order.

Though the question was about maps wasn't it? I'm running tangential.
Image
moe wrote:Matted with hair, armed to the teeth, swift as the noble beast his screen name so "lovingly" embodies.. . ..

Wielding a hot dog in one hand and a fedora in the other. . . . .
User avatar
stahrgazer
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Gender: Female
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by stahrgazer »

Commander62890 wrote:If two players are very good and both know the map well, then the main influences upon the game will be drop and dice.

However, if one player does not know a certain map (or setting) well, he or she is more liable to make a mistake.
This means that the player who wins will often have won due to superior strategy, not luck.

On small, simple maps, the person who wins will more often have won due to luck than on large, complex maps.


Even with an opponent making a mistake, you must have dice luck to take advantage of the mistake.
Image
User avatar
Joodoo
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:19 am
Gender: Male
Location: Greater Toronto, Canada

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Joodoo »

nebsmith wrote:8 player singles on Hive. auto, seq, fog, adj, not escalating.


Even with escalating luck doesn't help/hinder much on that map.
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.

And if they dont suck then they blow.

:D
User avatar
Swimmerdude99
Posts: 2581
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:07 pm
Gender: Male
Location: North Carolina

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Swimmerdude99 »

Das Schlob in my opinion
Image
User avatar
Gillipig
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Gillipig »

1v1 on Hive is very little about luck! I hate that map though :) !
jammyjames
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by jammyjames »

Gillipig wrote:1v1 on Hive is very little about luck! I hate that map though :) !


still involves quite a bit..

For instance i have had my initial deploy and lost it all trying to take a 3.. as a consequence i got screwed
Image
User avatar
White Moose
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:33 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by White Moose »

Waterloo all the way baby.
Image
Highest Score: 3374
User avatar
Gillipig
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Gillipig »

jammyjames wrote:
Gillipig wrote:1v1 on Hive is very little about luck! I hate that map though :) !


still involves quite a bit..

For instance i have had my initial deploy and lost it all trying to take a 3.. as a consequence i got screwed

Might be true, I haven't got much experience on the map but it's big as hell and has a territory bonus roof so it should be relatively luck free! One game setting I know requires very little luck is 3 player no spoils games on Imperium Romanum! It's all about how you play your opponents. I've won 66% of 100 something games with those settings and often with crappy dice! Knowing where to invest, when to break someones bonus, which regions are good and foresee the opponents moves is more vital than usual! Makes for great games as well!
User avatar
0ojakeo0
Posts: 6150
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:49 am
Location: ON THE ROAD TO SAN ANTONIO!!!!

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by 0ojakeo0 »

doodle earth
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”