5. All votes must be inred and bold. vote rodion I do not care about unvotes but you can especially to remove a vote.
targetman377 wrote:I don't know what evidence you have on me in this game? honestly also i was not online cause i was at work during the deadline. I think BG is the scum here. Vote BG. His past post just seem to jump out at me as being scum just a feeling i have.
Target this is the second time that you have not followed the rules with voting an individual. I still feel that the pressure for you target should not stop. I understand you were at work but I still would like to hear from you since you were 1 vote away from being lynched. I am not voting for you yet out of good faith since yesterday you did not have much time to defend yourself.
As well can you please present the case or argument about BGtheBrain?
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to phish and he'll charge your credit card for lunch forever.
BGtheBrain has the most convincing point here so far. I will not vote yet till we here from the others. So far I am suspicious of Targetman and 1 of the others(Jen or Mass)
I also agree too with Bleed. What is your case against BGtheBrain?
targetman377 wrote:I thought there was a rule no unvoting
targetman377 wrote:EPWOP vote dazza
5. All votes must be inred and bold. vote rodion I do not care about unvotes but you can especially to remove a vote.
It says unvotes are ok especially to remove a vote. Also, you unvoted previously in this game. It also says votes need to be in red.
We gotta vote for someone and there is nothing to go on, so I will be voting you. 1) You didnt vote in red. 2) You said you didnt think there was unvotes. 3) You previously unvoted.
I understand there is very little logic in this argument, but it's better than nothing. Calling Dazza a she was almost enough to get me to not vote for you because it made my day.
Vote targetman377
My same argument stands since nothing has changed. Surviving by lack of a vote does not sway me. Plus there is no new info to lead me in another direction, except that Jen didnt vote for you. This would lead me to believe you both are mafia, but I dont know anything for sure. Give me a better reason to vote for someone else and Ill be more than happy to vote that way.
Your original argument against Target was NOT "better than nothing". It was, in fact, nothing. And a trail of logic that starts with nothing, ends with nothing, so dragging me into your theory is pretty useless. Targetman may be mafia. I may be mafia. But your reasons for thinking so are not credible.
I find targetman suspicious and Jen defending him makes me double suspicious. It seems to me they are the scum here. We can't lynch 2 so vote targetman
dazza2008 wrote:I find targetman suspicious and Jen defending him makes me double suspicious. It seems to me they are the scum here. We can't lynch 2 so vote targetman
I have to agree, I was one of the three to not vote...but I have been convinced.
Well, I'm a townie, so 3 of you are townies as well. Since I doubt Brain's reasons for voting Targetman are legitimate, I consider Targetman's impending doom to be randomly dealt. This can lead to two eventualities: 40% chance (2/5) that he's a goon and we were right to lynch him - This keeps us in the game with 1 scum and 3 townies. 60% chance (3/5) that he's a townie and we were wrong to lynch him - This ends the game in mafia's favor.
Bleed_Green wrote:VOTE targetman on the basis that Jens claim is week at most and I believe that this will prove both to be mafia. I see her claim to mislead the mafia
Sorry man,, I knew you were a dude the entire time it is just when I see Jen... (my ex's name) I just associate with a female..as well when I am typing my fingers usually go faster then my mind thinks
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to phish and he'll charge your credit card for lunch forever.
