strike wolf wrote:It doesn't look like Lala ever answered the latest allegation against him...
I've been on lala for a while now. Taking this long to come back on allegations pushes me over the edge.
vote lala
You have a vote? Curious... but I have to agree with the sentiment, we can't afford to lynch the wrong person because of a deadline, especially if they are a doc or something, we need to hurry this information along so there is no room for error. vote lala. Please explain your reasoning for worrying about a mafia quick-hammer?
Good catch though it appears to have been due to forgetfulness. Also did you forget Kratos claimed doc already? Well it's not impossible that they both claim doc but seems a bit unlikely.
Of course not, I'm saying we don't want our claimed doc to be deadline killed because of laziness, since we know the mod is going to kill someone anyways (unless most voters go for no lynch) and there are still two votes on him.
strike wolf wrote:It doesn't look like Lala ever answered the latest allegation against him...
I've been on lala for a while now. Taking this long to come back on allegations pushes me over the edge.
vote lala
You have a vote? Curious... but I have to agree with the sentiment, we can't afford to lynch the wrong person because of a deadline, especially if they are a doc or something, we need to hurry this information along so there is no room for error. vote lala. Please explain your reasoning for worrying about a mafia quick-hammer?
Oops, I forgot that the soup had left me without a vote for the day. The soup must still be getting to me because I can't even remember that.
Time is running out and there is no sign of lalaland, in fact, where the heck is everyone else for that matter? This is highly suspect... We need a claim immediately, can we get a prod on lala please?
LOL, prodding Butters to get him in here to talk when usually nobody wants anything to do with him.....sad. I just have been waiting to hear from lala before I really decide who to vote for. Hopefully that prod will get her in here.
Hey everybody, totally forgot about this. Also, I concur with evilchaos, what exactly is the case against me? I found all of the coppy things weird, and with decreased activity I changed my vote a few times trying to find a lead. Anyways. I'm Principal Victoria, one-shot town vig. I have not yet used my shot.
lalaland wrote:Hey everybody, totally forgot about this. Also, I concur with evilchaos, what exactly is the case against me? I found all of the coppy things weird, and with decreased activity I changed my vote a few times trying to find a lead. Anyways. I'm Principal Victoria, one-shot town vig. I have not yet used my shot.
One shot vig? If it were me and I thought there wasn't a case against me, I'm not sure I would claim a killing role. Maybe that's just the soup talking though.
lala the case is that you voted 2 cops, that could of been weird, but understandable. then you changed with the crowd going to krots. I think that is why most people are voting you.
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
Well the role is a bit bigger than Nurse Gollum and it is testable if we have him kill someone though not sure if there is a good target for him to select. At the moment I would say we already have too many claimed power roles to potentially risk outing another and regardless of how small the role we can't risk killing a un-cced doc role and lala's claim is at the very least testable.
Well lala is probably going to be the lynch anyways but vote no lynch
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Vote Count lalaland (3) - Commander9, 40kguy, / (L - 3) kratos (2) - evilchaos, Talapus\ no lynch (1) - strike wolf With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
Deadline: Friday July 1st Same as last time, the person with the most votes will be lynched. Ties will be broken randomly. If No Lynch has the most votes, then no one will be lynched. A Majority is NOT required for a lynch.
I'm thinking that we should still lynch kratos. He's playing in this game very much like he played in Quickie Mafia, when he was my scum partner. He was online a few times PMing me during Quick Maf nights and wasn't posting in here.
Not sure if kratos has really been in enough games to be metagamed and it's not the most far fetched idea to suggest that him trying to not draw attention to himself as doc as he suggested was in part the reason for his behavior.. Other than that you're suggesting we lynch a non counter claimed doc? That sounds like high risk territory there.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
It seems like it could be legit, and other than Chef's role the game seems to be pretty by the book so far, I would say the claimed doc can cover one of our claimed cops, (or some other target to mind-screw with whatever scum is out there.) and the watchers/trackers can do their thing to confirm the legitimacy of everything. or an alternate plan? what if kratos and lala were to target the same person with their actions while a watcher watched them, this would confirm both at once since A: if krato was lying then said person would die, B: if lala is lying then her action must either be the scum who's killing everyone or something else (such as the soup poisoner ) thus revealing her since said action will be absent elsewhere. C: if both are lying we lose two scum at the cost of one townie. The only problem with these plans is they massively cripple the effectivity of town's possible actions and protections if we don't have scum within our grasp. logical targets would be either those who need protection since it effectively disables outside interference, those who are expendable since it presents the least loss, or perhaps me for suggesting it? in any case if we go with this we must be in absolute agreement, since it requires the consensus of three roles and a target
so quick yay or nay, and who should the target be if we do it?
I willunvote and vote No lynch, I don't think a good case can be made within 24 hours, and would rather not gamble when sure logic is presumably possible.
Vote Count lalaland (2) - Commander9, 40kguy kratos (2) - evilchaos, Talapus no lynch (2) - strike wolf, / With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
Deadline: Friday July 1st (Approximately 24 hours from now) Same as last time, the person with the most votes will be lynched. Ties will be broken randomly. If No Lynch has the most votes, then no one will be lynched. A Majority is NOT required for a lynch. As it is now, it will be a random choice between lalaland, kratos, and no lynch.
Vote Count lalaland (2) - Commander9, 40kguy kratos (1) - Talapus no lynch (4) - strike wolf, /, evilchaos, lalaland With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.
Deadline: Friday July 1st (Approximately 24 hours from now) Same as last time, the person with the most votes will be lynched. Ties will be broken randomly. If No Lynch has the most votes, then no one will be lynched. A Majority is NOT required for a lynch.
evilchaos wrote:I'm thinking that we should still lynch kratos. He's playing in this game very much like he played in Quickie Mafia, when he was my scum partner. He was online a few times PMing me during Quick Maf nights and wasn't posting in here.
A lot of this is due to the schedule I've had lately. For the past 120 hours roughly I've been without any internet access because I was counseling at a youth camp. Now that I'm back and my schedule has lightened up a bit I'll be more active. Anyway Vote No Lynch
Best Score: 2799, Best Rank: Colonel, Best Scoreboard Spot: 126 Funniest Game:Game 1675072 Sickest Game:Game 2975352
At the end of the day, the town had agreed not to lynch anyone. As the sun set, an eerie mist filled the air, and the town agreed it was best to get to sleep.
Begin Night 3. Please send me your night actions by Sunday Night (I'll try to post the scene then)
