SIEGE! - PSD available - [Quenched]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- spinwizard
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am
- spinwizard
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am
- spinwizard
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am
this is what i came up with. they r not great but try them!
Great hall-
1- Entrance
2- Lords
3- Advisers
4- Queen
5- Security
Plains
1- No mans Land
2- Training Area
3- Bridgehead
4- Fishing Spots
5- Farmhouse
6- Wheat Fields
7- Animal Paddocks
Midlands
1- Gate House
2- Main Road
3- Dock
4- Boat Builders
5- Woodchoppers Hut
6- Seers Village
Swamp
1- Fringe swamp
2- Marshy Bridge
3- Gloomy Pool
4- Deep Marsh
5- Woods edge
Forest
1- Waters Edge
2- Woods Entrance
3- Hermits House
4- Dark Wood
Wood camp
1- Main Camp
2- Generals Camp
Camp
1- Solders Quarters
2- Generals Quarters
3- Stable
Great hall-
1- Entrance
2- Lords
3- Advisers
4- Queen
5- Security
Plains
1- No mans Land
2- Training Area
3- Bridgehead
4- Fishing Spots
5- Farmhouse
6- Wheat Fields
7- Animal Paddocks
Midlands
1- Gate House
2- Main Road
3- Dock
4- Boat Builders
5- Woodchoppers Hut
6- Seers Village
Swamp
1- Fringe swamp
2- Marshy Bridge
3- Gloomy Pool
4- Deep Marsh
5- Woods edge
Forest
1- Waters Edge
2- Woods Entrance
3- Hermits House
4- Dark Wood
Wood camp
1- Main Camp
2- Generals Camp
Camp
1- Solders Quarters
2- Generals Quarters
3- Stable
spinwizard wrote:this is what i came up with. they r not great but try them!
Great hall-
1- Entrance
2- Lords
3- Advisers
4- Queen
5- Security
Plains
1- No mans Land
2- Training Area
3- Bridgehead
4- Fishing Spots
5- Farmhouse
6- Wheat Fields
7- Animal Paddocks
Midlands
1- Gate House
2- Main Road
3- Dock
4- Boat Builders
5- Woodchoppers Hut
6- Seers Village
Swamp
1- Fringe swamp
2- Marshy Bridge
3- Gloomy Pool
4- Deep Marsh
5- Woods edge
Forest
1- Waters Edge
2- Woods Entrance
3- Hermits House
4- Dark Wood
Wood camp
1- Main Camp
2- Generals Camp
Camp
1- Solders Quarters
2- Generals Quarters
3- Stable
i dunno... looks pretty cluttered to me, and the names wouldnt fit in the great hall

- spinwizard
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am
spinwizard wrote:i see what u mean...can u play about with the fonts?
r u sure they don't fit in the hall, those were my best names
i've played with the fonts some, the thing is, this is the BIG map, if the fonts get smaller here, the they will be unreadable on the small map.
i wish the maps could be huge, but they cant
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24935
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
- spinwizard
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am
- spinwizard
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am
mibi wrote:spinwizard wrote:i see what u mean...can u play about with the fonts?
r u sure they don't fit in the hall, those were my best names
i've played with the fonts some, the thing is, this is the BIG map, if the fonts get smaller here, the they will be unreadable on the small map./
"Play with the font" often means try a different font, something that will be readable on the small map. You can use an ornamental font for the first letter maybe, but pick a simple clean font for the rest.
I like the names but would prefer shorter names, like "Cliffs" instead of Wheat Fields, or "Dunes" or "Beaches" instead of Fishing Spots. Simple "Mid Plains" or "North Swamp" type names seem reasonable too?
Why would the training area be on the front line? Shouldn't that be out of arrow range? I think I'll skip the training!
KEYOGI wrote:Without names is better. The two forest areas are much easier to distinguish between now and it still looks good. Maybe look into the colours used to represent them in the legend though, they don't seem to match.
each forest/woods has lots of green shades, so its just about getting the best match.

- DiM
- Posts: 10415
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: making maps for scooby snacks
in the current map layout adding names just clutters the whole thing and i do agree it looks far better without them, BUT i'm very concerned about gameplay issues. imagine the long list of reinforcing or attacking. it will be something like: swamp 1, swamp 2, swamp 3.... this might cause a big problem especially in freestyle RT games where you have to be quick. i had this problem in the KOTM map. i deployed several times in the wrong spots or attacked other locations. with territory names you know exactly where to click. at the moment the only problematic teritories are greathall 1 and gate 1&2. all the rest have enough space to squeeze a name.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
I say just scrap the names, they arent needed...And everbody agrees they just clutter the map and actaully ruin it visually...
There are other maps out there that just use numbers...Chinese checkers and mountain map...
So lets just get on with it
There are other maps out there that just use numbers...Chinese checkers and mountain map...
So lets just get on with it
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
hulmey wrote:I say just scrap the names, they aren't needed...And everybody agrees they just clutter the map and actually ruin it visually...
There are other maps out there that just use numbers...Chinese checkers and mountain map...
I don't agree. The image posted with the names needs work, but it could look good with territory names. I think some of you got used to the way it looked and a few of you are getting anxious for it to be done; those are not good reasons to avoid improving the map.
Chinese Checkers and King of the Mountains would both be vastly improved with names, but even the great hall here has much more room than the Chinese Checkers spaces! I'm not sure why KotM doesn't have names... In hindsight, having played a few games on those maps I think the foundry should strongly resist any more non-name maps.
I think the map looks better without the names, but would play better with them. One of the reasons Chinese Checkers and King of The Mountains wont see much game time from me is because of the way territories are labelled.
Coming up with short but appropriate names will be the main problem. I'm not overly fond of any of the names presented.
Coming up with short but appropriate names will be the main problem. I'm not overly fond of any of the names presented.
- sully800
- Posts: 4978
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
As I said earlier, I think adding names is an important step. It may clutter the map a bit, but it will make playing the game easier and more enjoyable.
The font you choose was pretty distracting because of all the flourishes and how bold it was. A simpler font would be less gaudy and distracting but still legible even if it was a bit thinner and smaller. Also, the shorter you make the names the better, because it will take up less area on the map and the names will be able to fit into tighter spaces.
The font you choose was pretty distracting because of all the flourishes and how bold it was. A simpler font would be less gaudy and distracting but still legible even if it was a bit thinner and smaller. Also, the shorter you make the names the better, because it will take up less area on the map and the names will be able to fit into tighter spaces.

