California [Quenched]
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Re: California 4.2
Argh! I hate it when I can't think of the correct terminology! Yea, I think I meant subdue the background to make it so it's noticeable but not the focal point.
- natty dread
- Posts: 12877
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
- Location: just plain fucked
Re: California 4.2
isaiah40 wrote:Argh! I hate it when I can't think of the correct terminology! Yea, I think I meant subdue the background to make it so it's noticeable but not the focal point.
Yeah, in that case I agree, I suggested earlier to make the background darker.

- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.2
isaiah40 wrote:I finally figured out what is wrong here. Can you please reduce the opacity of the background? The sunset as it is right now is the focal point. We want the focal point to be the playing area itself. Try reducing it by around 30%, and don't forget to reduce the opacity in the insets as well to match the background. Everything else is looking good, so if you can do this please, I'll take another look at it, then maybe we can get this bumped along.
Most excellent. Sorry for the delay, I've been out of town all weekend. So I can get to this tomorrow.
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.2
[bigimg]http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/223/californiaupload.jpg[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
K, I didn't mess with the opacity but I reduced the saturation in parts of the background to produce the same desired effect. Which is a decreased emphasis on the background, directing more focus to the Map itself.
[bigimg]http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
K, I didn't mess with the opacity but I reduced the saturation in parts of the background to produce the same desired effect. Which is a decreased emphasis on the background, directing more focus to the Map itself.
Re: California 4.3
Not too bad. Me thinks it needs a little more desaturation. And please do not forget the insets as well!!
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
isaiah40 wrote:Not too bad. Me thinks it needs a little more desaturation. And please do not forget the insets as well!!
I did hit the insets as well. But I'll give it a little more.
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
[bigimg]http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/223/californiaupload.jpg[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
- Industrial Helix
- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:49 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Ohio
Re: California 4.3
How about an image with 888s
Sketchblog [Update 07/25/11]: http://indyhelixsketch.blogspot.com/
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
- Victor Sullivan
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
Re: California 4.3
*crosses his fingers*
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
Industrial Helix wrote:How about an image with 888s
Of course:
Everything looks 90% good. I've only got a few coordinate fixes for you Victor.
SMALL:
[bigimg]http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8291/picture9cj.png[/bigimg]
-Nappa Valley bump it up and to the left, just over the "A"
-Berkley, San Mateo, & Santa cruz, bump a little to the left
-move Oakland up and left so it sits just above the tip of the y in Berkley
-Sierra Madre, relocate it above the text.
-Lassen bump left
-Salton Sea & Needles bump left
-Hollywood, Central, Anaheim, $ Pasadena can all be bummped just a smidge to the left.
LARGE:
[bigimg]http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/7330/picture10xs.png[/bigimg]
-Nappa Valley (same treatment as small)
-Oakland (same treatment as small)
-Central bump to the right
-Sierra Madre (same treatment as small)
- Victor Sullivan
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
Re: California 4.3
Alright, but Central to the right on the large?
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
- Victor Sullivan
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
Re: California 4.3
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
Oh sweet. Sorry I've been out. I'll take a look at this tomorrow morning.
Re: California 4.3
love the sunny felling of the map
and as you are in graphic
I have a readability problem with bay area insert
you have to make it independent from the main map
by closing the frame as you did for LA
and as you are in graphic
I have a readability problem with bay area insert
you have to make it independent from the main map
by closing the frame as you did for LA
De gueules à la tour d'argent ouverte, crénelée de trois pièces, sommée d'un donjon ajouré, crénelé de deux pièces
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
love the sunny felling of the map
and as you are in graphic
I have a readability problem with bay area insert
you have to make it independent from the main map
by closing the frame as you did for LA
Why do I have to close it up? obviously if you are aware of the fact that you were looking at an inset for the Bay area you didn't actually have a readability problem.
Last edited by The Bison King on Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
Ok here's the test results for the new XML
[bigimg]http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7072/picture11tj.png[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/246/picture12ip.png[/bigimg]
Everything looks good to me. As for central on the large I did in fact mean "left" when I said "right" but it looks fine to me how it is on the version.
[bigimg]http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7072/picture11tj.png[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/246/picture12ip.png[/bigimg]
Everything looks good to me. As for central on the large I did in fact mean "left" when I said "right" but it looks fine to me how it is on the version.
Re: California 4.3
The Bison King wrote:love the sunny felling of the map
and as you are in graphic
I have a readability problem with bay area insert
you have to make it independent from the main map
by closing the frame as you did for LA
Why do I have to close it up? obviously if you are aware of the fact that you were looking at an inset for the Bay area you didn't actually have a readability problem.
because it is not clear it is an inset and a map prolongation
and it took me a while to figure how those territories where connected
De gueules à la tour d'argent ouverte, crénelée de trois pièces, sommée d'un donjon ajouré, crénelé de deux pièces
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
- Industrial Helix
- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:49 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Ohio
Re: California 4.3
Hmm... i had no trouble at all when I viewed it. I mean, i recognized it as an inset right off... but then, i look at maps on CC too much.
What about labeling the bordering territories in the inset, even though the numbers wouldn't be there. That way it would be clear what borders what.
What about labeling the bordering territories in the inset, even though the numbers wouldn't be there. That way it would be clear what borders what.
Sketchblog [Update 07/25/11]: http://indyhelixsketch.blogspot.com/
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.3
[bigimg]http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/223/californiaupload.jpg[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
How's that look?
[bigimg]http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
How's that look?
Re: California 4.4
well it helps a bit
but my confusion came from the bay itself in the main map
it doesn't seems to be sea but land!
the black frame of the inset seems to be some coast
and so the inset isn't an inset but an extension
maybe with a double or triple line for the coast
but my confusion came from the bay itself in the main map
it doesn't seems to be sea but land!
the black frame of the inset seems to be some coast
and so the inset isn't an inset but an extension
maybe with a double or triple line for the coast
De gueules à la tour d'argent ouverte, crénelée de trois pièces, sommée d'un donjon ajouré, crénelé de deux pièces
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
- Victor Sullivan
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
Re: California 4.4
Oh, one thing that's been bothering me is Oakland and Berkeley are quite disproportionate on the map itself compared to the inset.
And pamoa, I don't really think it can be helped at this point, and I honestly don't see what's so hard to understand...
-Sully
And pamoa, I don't really think it can be helped at this point, and I honestly don't see what's so hard to understand...
-Sully
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
Scaling back on my CC involvement...
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.4
I don't really think it can be helped at this point, and I honestly don't see what's so hard to understand...
This is exactly how I feel on the subject.
Re: California 4.4
well sorry for disturbing
De gueules à la tour d'argent ouverte, crénelée de trois pièces, sommée d'un donjon ajouré, crénelé de deux pièces
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
Gules an open tower silver, crenellated three parts, topped by a apertured turret, crenellated two parts
Re: California 4.4
Isn't this California map getting anywhere NEAR the Final Foundry or Beta yet? It's been a long time, and some of us would like to play it and try it out.
Those latest XML images look okay to me. I think Bison King has done well. How long will it be until we can battle in California, and iron out the glitches?
P.S. Yes, the relative sizes of Berkeley & Oakland appear different on the main map, as compared to the OBVIOUS inset map.
Those latest XML images look okay to me. I think Bison King has done well. How long will it be until we can battle in California, and iron out the glitches?
P.S. Yes, the relative sizes of Berkeley & Oakland appear different on the main map, as compared to the OBVIOUS inset map.
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: California 4.4
[bigimg]http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/223/californiaupload.jpg[/bigimg]
[bigimg]http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
Berkley re-sized.
[bigimg]http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/1262/californiasmallupload.jpg[/bigimg]
Berkley re-sized.
