(Thread of CC Records) 1st 5's & TOP 5's

[lokisgal]

he would put a * next to the persons name - dont know if he will do that to himself.......

[DoomYoshi]

Top 5 Aged People:
[player]danfrank[/player]:102
[player]J.C. I Rocc[/player]: 101
[player]Thai Robert[/player]: 101
More to come

[nagerous]

Top 5 Aged People:
[player]danfrank[/player]:102
[player]J.C. I Rocc[/player]: 101
[player]Thai Robert[/player]: 101
More to come

I imagine those to be fake ages.

[DoomYoshi]

Top 5 Aged People:
[player]danfrank[/player]:102
[player]J.C. I Rocc[/player]: 101
[player]Thai Robert[/player]: 101
More to come

I imagine those to be fake ages.

Right, asterisks all around then.

[Robinette]

Who is going to spend the time to add all the " * " ?

heheheeee...



this actually could lead to the creation of a new Top 5 category...

Top 5 with the most " * "

[White Moose]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

[Rodion]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

He'll make a distinction between "cheating to achieve a record" and "cheating after achieving the record". That distinction will save him from asterisks or deletions, obviously, since this is his thread.

[White Moose]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

He'll make a distinction between "cheating to achieve a record" and "cheating after achieving the record". That distinction will save him from asterisks or deletions, obviously, since this is his thread.

Probably

[Robinette]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes


and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...



So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

[Fruitcake]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes


and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...



So is what Blitz has done considered mild hypocrisy? or was it outright duplicity?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

Fixed.

Have an egg on me.

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes


and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...



So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

deleted players are probably these

Warsteiner/Switchfoot/Renegades- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=69031
Dminus- multi
Krusher- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=34031&hilit=krusher+busted
KIDPAT- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=52930&hilit=kidpat+busted
Hotblondewithbod- viewtopic.php?f=6&t=46418&hilit=Hotblondewithbod&start=45
Maxatstuy- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=68165&hilit=Maxatstuy
Jesusreigns/JCKing- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=67208&p=1652591&hilit=+krusher#p1652591
Ramned/the egg- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=75958&hilit=rammed
muld00n- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=77689&p=1847718#p1847718
PInocheckio/Peter Pan - viewtopic.php?f=239&t=69744&p=1710900&hilit=PInocheckio+busted#p1710900
BENJIKAT/BENJIKAT IS DEAD- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=41101&hilit=benji&start=15
lanyards- multi ( no thread available )
MOBAJOBG- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=93694&hilit=farm
KraphtOne- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100025
EagleofGreenErth- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=102943

[PLAYER57832]

Top 5 Aged People:
[player]danfrank[/player]:102
[player]J.C. I Rocc[/player]: 101
[player]Thai Robert[/player]: 101
More to come

I must be the youngest.... my profile says 1

[demonfork]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes


and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...



So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...

herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.


As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

I figured I would bump this to the top so sitteraholic could update it upon his return. Since he nothing to work on the past month but this, it should only take a couple seconds to provide us with this much needed information.

[King_Herpes]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes


and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...



So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...

herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.


As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.

Blitz* actually told me* that he* denounced my name due to an ancient incident in which I* had sent an instant invite link into a difficult map via private message. Two invisible people were sent the invite, one of which I* had met in live chat.

What he* had misrenembered to acknowledge during *our* private moment of confidence was that people were waiting for me* to slip up for quite some time. He* was merely carrying out his duly duties of catering to the cries of the public. He* always meets the public's needs. You* invisible people are uneducated on the matter simply because the mass paranoia machine that is....... 'Duuuhnnndugnduuuuhhhhnnnn'!!!!!!!! CHEATING & ABUSE!!!1!!!ONEHUNDREDANDELEVEN! never broadcasted it. That is because I* neutralized it using clutch skills of diplomacy and beurocratic lobbying that I* previously had learnt from engaging in the game of RISK®.

Okay okay I* put the guys kid through college, get over it!!

I* believe I* was petting my cat angrily while cursing at the monitor in my Mother's basement, pulling my hair out, gritting my teeth and wearing open sores on my palms from clenching my fist in disbelief of the di when Blitz* despairingly gave it reason. My eyes turned red. I* tore out my cats diminutive spine and ate it's innards in what was somewhat of an overreaction. You see my invisible friends, upon reflection I* miss my little kitty. I* also miss the days where players waited until referees(moderus adminii) made the call.

As many people noted to point out before me*, this is just a list compiled from one players perspective. Never meant jack dick to me*. He* can take mine off and give himself** two for all I care.

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes


and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...



So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...

herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.


As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.

Blitz* actually told me* that he* denounced my name due to an ancient incident in which I* had sent an instant invite link into a difficult map via private message. Two invisible people were sent the invite, one of which I* had met in live chat.

What he* had misrenembered to acknowledge during *our* private moment of confidence was that people were waiting for me* to slip up for quite some time. He* was merely carrying out his duly duties of catering to the cries of the public. He* always meets the public's needs. You* invisible people are uneducated on the matter simply because the mass paranoia machine that is....... 'Duuuhnnndugnduuuuhhhhnnnn'!!!!!!!! CHEATING & ABUSE!!!1!!!ONEHUNDREDANDELEVEN! never broadcasted it. That is because I* neutralized it using clutch skills of diplomacy and beurocratic lobbying that I* previously had learnt from engaging in the game of RISK®.

Okay okay I* put the guys kid through college, get over it!!

I* believe I* was petting my cat angrily while cursing at the monitor in my Mother's basement, pulling my hair out, gritting my teeth and wearing open sores on my palms from clenching my fist in disbelief of the di when Blitz* despairingly gave it reason. My eyes turned red. I* tore out my cats diminutive spine and ate it's innards in what was somewhat of an overreaction. You see my invisible friends, upon reflection I* miss my little kitty. I* also miss the days where players waited until referees(moderus adminii) made the call.

As many people noted to point out before me*, this is just a list compiled from one players perspective. Never meant jack dick to me*. He* can take mine off and give himself** two for all I* care.

missed one at the end there

[King_Herpes]

Nope, I sure didn't Johnathon. You see, actually it fits the scenario I imagined in the last sentence. Get it? Or do you need to go back to smart school? Here have a cookie for trying;

[owenshooter]

at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex

[ljex]

at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex

like it or not blitz does run this thread and as such has the right to do what he wants with it...besides this is not where you should be trying to get him to remove himself as none of his records here were a result of the above mentioned cheating

[KraphtOne]

agreed, i can't stand the guy but this is not an official thread its his thread, he can chose to disrespect singles freestylers all he wants to... the most challenging games to play on this site are 8 player speed freestyles and for my money the best players are the players that can excel at those...

fact is that you can't possibly win 70 to 80 percent of your sequential games if you're playing against players of the same skill level constantly...

just isnt possible in my opinion, but hey maybe someone can show me a player that has 70% wins with an equalitarian level relative rank...

and don't give me the "if you're always in the 4000+ range there is no way to maintain equalitarian"

the real sentence is "it's impossible to stay in the 4000+ range with a high win percentage without playing auto-win games"

[King_Herpes]

Right here on WHERP radio!! Home of the drippy drop-morning dew crew!!

Where if you're our nineteenth caller and you can name yesterday's #1 chart topping billboard hit, you'll receive a free "Blitzaholic*" pull string talking action figure!!

That's right, just listen everyday from 8-9pm Mountain standard time write down the name and artist of that #1 song, call in at 1-888-got-herp(that's 1-888-486-4377), be our 19th caller and you could win your very own "Blitzaholic*" action figure. Comes complete with the White Horse of Conquest*!!, and i gots the herps. t-shirt!!

Just pull the string on Blitzkrieg's* back and you'll here memorable quotes like, "Sit on my account and spin on it"!, and other winners such as, "The public can think what they want"... and so many more!!

[owenshooter]

at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex

like it or not blitz does run this thread and as such has the right to do what he wants with it...besides this is not where you should be trying to get him to remove himself as none of his records here were a result of the above mentioned cheating

according to his own rules, that has nothing to do with it. he was busted for multiple violations and as such, per his own rules, should be removed. and one can argue that he maintained his spot at the top with the account abuse, so some of the records here are tainted in the manner in which you claim they are not. point blank, he has asterisked people for far less than what he himself has been busted for. period...-el Jesus negro

[Fruitcake]

at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex

like it or not blitz does run this thread and as such has the right to do what he wants with it...besides this is not where you should be trying to get him to remove himself as none of his records here were a result of the above mentioned cheating

Is it not normal to check on some one's own rules.

I quote from the book of Sitsaholic. This is the word he writ:

Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I see nothing about whether this happened on the way to their success or not. In fact there are a few who cheated to hold their position and they have been expunged from the great Sitzaholic's records.

The case is clear, Sitzaholic should expunge himself from his own record. This will provide a cathartic cleansing of his cc soul. I am sure KH or some one of a particular nature will be happy to provide deep and meaningful thrusts into his psyche to help him overcome his addiction to being a twat of the first order.

[chipv]

at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex

It won't get edited as that will derail one of the most interesting topics of discussion, possibly ever, on Conquer Club.
Sit down and eat some popcorn, the discussion about editing the thread is much more interesting than someone actually doing it.

[Robinette]

at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex

It won't get edited as that will derail one of the most interesting topics of discussion, possibly ever, on Conquer Club.
Sit down and eat some popcorn, the discussion about editing the thread is much more interesting than someone actually doing it.

heheee... so true, soooooo true...