real bad results in c and a (case resolved.)

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:25 am

I can't believe I've only just seen this thread.

lulz at eddie

eddie2 · Post by **eddie2** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:21 am

JoshyBoy wrote:I can't believe I've only just seen this thread.

lulz at eddie

you find this funny joshy. i don't

pearljamrox2 · Post by **pearljamrox2** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:55 am

go sox

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:45 am

AndyDufresne wrote:It's clear that Blitzaholic is a polarizing figure---but I think everyone has long knew that. It's clear that there is a lot of opinion regarding those for and against Blitz---or however your choose to delineate the sides. It's clear that a portion of the Community would like to case re-looked at, so I'm going to use my executive authority to reopen the case for investigation.

Lets all look at the evidence again, and in a line by line sort of manner, and see if we can also reconstruct the timeline.

The primary concerns seem to revolve around both Account Sitting/Point Dumping (and taking turns or not) and a general Gross Abuse of the game. So:

What is game by game list of the real games in question?

----> Lets go to this new topic to discuss the evidence.: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=143145

This topic can remain for other area of public discussion.

--Andy

I knew this was a good move andy - just look at how much this thread has calmed down...

I would like to suggest that when this new decision is made, it be accompanied with the evidence for all to see... be it proof of innocence, or proof of foul play... the people want to know.

Tazilon · Post by **Tazilon** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:46 pm

I think it is pathetic any of you even come up with crap like this to artifically inflate your scores. Who cares what your score is? You think one day the New York Times will run an article about you and you will start having Risk groupies clamoring for sex everywhere you go? Anybody who doesn't play the game straight up, anyone who needs these schemes to gain rank is telling everyone else one thing and one thing only: you suck too bad to do it on your own. Anyone can cheat. Anyone can bend the rules to try to make themselves look better. It takes a real player to do it straight up.

gannable · Post by **gannable** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:11 pm

Tazilon wrote:I think it is pathetic any of you even come up with crap like this to artifically inflate your scores. Who cares what your score is? You think one day the New York Times will run an article about you and you will start having Risk groupies clamoring for sex everywhere you go? Anybody who doesn't play the game straight up, anyone who needs these schemes to gain rank is telling everyone else one thing and one thing only: you suck too bad to do it on your own. Anyone can cheat. Anyone can bend the rules to try to make themselves look better. It takes a real player to do it straight up.

I think you've found the root of the problem. Some guys are foolishly getting their hopes up.

natty dread · Post by **natty dread** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:44 pm

Tazilon wrote: It takes a real player to do it straight up.

What kind of player does it on the rocks?

Chariot of Fire · Post by **Chariot of Fire** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:30 pm

Mmmmmm, Risk groupies.

owenshooter · Post by **owenshooter** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:14 pm

even worse, the thread has been locked again, just as the evidence was continuing to pile up. looks like some people came in trying to derail it and gave someone a cheap reason to lock it... this is something that needs to be discussed and figured out. the evidence being offered up keeps piling up and piling up, and i'm sure it is a lot to sort through, but a lock was not necessary... i hope an admin opens it back up and gives explicit instructions to stay on topic. the only people off topic were those that have not read the thread and continue to offer a defense without any substance. sad...-the black jesus

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:32 pm

owenshooter wrote:even worse, the thread has been locked again, just as the evidence was continuing to pile up. looks like some people came in trying to derail it and gave someone a cheap reason to lock it... this is something that needs to be discussed and figured out. the evidence being offered up keeps piling up and piling up, and i'm sure it is a lot to sort through, but a lock was not necessary... i hope an admin opens it back up and gives explicit instructions to stay on topic. the only people off topic were those that have not read the thread and continue to offer a defense without any substance. sad...-the black jesus

Agreed owen. Was unnecessary and counterproductive to lock that thread. I doubt it will stay locked for 24 hours. This is something that really needs community input, and managerial transparency.

Also, if they need to hand out warnings to people who are derailing it, then do it. It's an important enough thread to moderate it very tightly.

Chariot of Fire · Post by **Chariot of Fire** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:36 pm

I too was a bit disappointed to see that thread locked. For starters I couldn't see what the problem was to have prompted the lock, on top of which it means I'm unable to respond to Blitz's lengthy rebuttal of my previous statement. Pity, as I found a lot of contradictions therein.

eddie2 · Post by **eddie2** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:43 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:I too was a bit disappointed to see that thread locked. For starters I couldn't see what the problem was to have prompted the lock, on top of which it means I'm unable to respond to Blitz's lengthy rebuttal of my previous statement. Pity, as I found a lot of contradictions therein.

me 2 i was about to rip into it. what seems funny a c and a mod admits taking it off topic but locks it for that reason

lokisgal · Post by **lokisgal** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:47 pm

I also noticed it was locked and by a mod who is a clan mate of blitz's. Conflict of interests perhaps. I would hope not but just to avoid the suspicion of such I think said mod should recuse himself from the discussion

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:58 pm

I 6th this notion. The thread seemed pretty calm and composed at the time it was locked.

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:04 pm

I too agree that said thread should not have been locked.. and am disappointed to see that...

This could very likely cause more problems that it was trying to solve.

So what now?

Does the discussion pick up here?
Does that really make sense?

eddie2 · Post by **eddie2** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:05 pm

Funkyterrance wrote:I 6th this notion. The thread seemed pretty calm and composed at the time it was locked.

Mod edit ow what a sore head i have

ljex · Post by **ljex** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:01 pm

guys calm down, he said in the thread he was locking it for the time being, im sure it will be open soon

ljex · Post by **ljex** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:07 pm

Tazilon wrote:I think it is pathetic any of you even come up with crap like this to artifically inflate your scores. Who cares what your score is? You think one day the New York Times will run an article about you and you will start having Risk groupies clamoring for sex everywhere you go? Anybody who doesn't play the game straight up, anyone who needs these schemes to gain rank is telling everyone else one thing and one thing only: you suck too bad to do it on your own. Anyone can cheat. Anyone can bend the rules to try to make themselves look better. It takes a real player to do it straight up.

you do realize there are very few bad players who gain a high rank even when trying to manipulate their score, There is no magic potion to get you there, you have to have some skill at at least one game style to get there. Furthermore i have never understood the people shouldnt care about their score because this is just an online risk game argument, when you are caring about someone who cares about their score in an online risk game...just goes to show you that people care about insignificant things. Lastly whats fun varies from person to person, some like to play to play others like to set goals for themselves and see if they can reach them. Yes you think its silly but let people do what they want to its their life and none of your business.

clapper011 · Post by **clapper011** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:07 pm

eddie2 wrote:
Funkyterrance wrote:I 6th this notion. The thread seemed pretty calm and composed at the time it was locked.

bull shit lets just say it. it was locked because blitz flucked his statement up and there was many that could counter it. e84e(that i have now lost respect for) has the inside info from mod pages. and before we can counter has locked it ?????????????????????????????????

time to calm down and get some sleep, eddie. perhaps he locked it for the night to calm everyone down?

Funkyterrance · Post by **Funkyterrance** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:13 pm

Eddie my man, I was agreeing with you. I 6th it means I agree with what the last 5 posters said.
It was calm so I don't understand why they DID lock it.

Peace,
Funky

WPBRJ · Post by **WPBRJ** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:29 pm

Chariot of Fire wrote:I too was a bit disappointed to see that thread locked. For starters I couldn't see what the problem was to have prompted the lock, on top of which it means I'm unable to respond to Blitz's lengthy rebuttal of my previous statement. Pity, as I found a lot of contradictions therein.

it was one of blitz very own lackeys that flamed it and then admitted it

Re: Blitzaholic, Jobiwan -- Redux

Postby eye84free on Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:24 pm

eddie2 wrote:eye i did not say that i was saying to blitz that i did not start this as a personal vendeta against him i followed what i was advised by a c and a member. plz can you also post my first contact to you to prove i was looking into a point dumping case via jobi also the pm. you know that you and one other c and a mod are the most repescted by me.

You are correct eddie you did infact first report jobiwan to me about point dumping, this I know to be a fact, it then expanded after you looked into it from what I can tell.

Neither here nor there I belive we are getting of track here and Im just as guilty from my earlier post. I believe others have also got off track so therefore im going to lock this topic for the time being.

and then locked it for his own actions what a crock of shit i guess it pays to be blitz water boy

i have heard blitz shit don't stink lets ask a professional about it hey eye84free does that azz really smell like a rose or does it smell like shit?

Dako · Post by **Dako** » Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:24 am

I think "locked for the time being" is a graveyard mark for the reports. Also, I am surprised it got locked - what for? Someone was flaming there? People were discussing important matters in a calmly fashion, without insults or trolling. What I am most scared that eye will not unlock the thread by himself and others (c&a mods and andy) will not do so as well because they will try to stay on his side to look consistent. However I hope it will be not true.

I think we should continue to discuss the matter here before the C&A report is opened again.

real bad results in c and a (case resolved.)

what do you think this case should have ended with

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a

Re: real bad results in c and a