Dugcarr has went too far- I suggest he should be banned

tahitiwahini · Post by **tahitiwahini** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:19 pm

qeee1 wrote:
tahitiwahini wrote:
qeee1 wrote:communism is not by definition repressive

except when it's practiced.

no, as the repressive institutions set up in the name of communism cease to be communist when they abandon communist ideals.

Not to further the debate....

but might there not perhaps be a fundamental problem with a political system that has always resulted in repressive institutions being set up in order to sustain itself. I guess I'm not too concerned with abstract theory here, just an observation of mundane reality.

Anyway, I'm not the one who introduced communism to this discussion. I just found it interesting to see that there are still those who will jump to it's defense.

For what it's worth, I don't see how what Dug did, or what the moderators did in response, bears much relation at all to communist ideology either in theory or in practice.

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:26 pm

subjekt wrote:I would like a pro-rated rebate of my membership back please....I will gladly not visit this site anymore. You know the interesting thing is that there is alot of shit that goes on here as people climb the ranks. Mostly from people trying to keep you from getting to general ( I cant tell you the shit I went through!! ) from people trying to be partners to lose on purpose and all sorts of stuff...it amazes me and honestly I think it is part of the game....obviously if you get to a certain point you just got to be " A LITTLE SMARTER" than the average bear. My point being is this...whilst what dugcarr1 did was wrong in intent it is still sporting in a twisted way...all about ADVANCED STRATEGY in a way. Ok I may be stretching things far here but it is possible. Either way I am very much not pleased with the outcome and think it is a mistake. Do I want to play at CC? Sure...however there are alot of other sites I can dominate at... I took a few months off from the stress of high stakes poker...guess Full Tilt is always open...and hey I t\am sure there arent any Commie bastards there.

FREEE DUGCARR1

-Sub-

A fucking men brotha

Kid_A · Post by **Kid_A** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:30 pm

hendy wrote:
subjekt wrote:I would like a pro-rated rebate of my membership back please....I will gladly not visit this site anymore. You know the interesting thing is that there is alot of shit that goes on here as people climb the ranks. Mostly from people trying to keep you from getting to general ( I cant tell you the shit I went through!! ) from people trying to be partners to lose on purpose and all sorts of stuff...it amazes me and honestly I think it is part of the game....obviously if you get to a certain point you just got to be " A LITTLE SMARTER" than the average bear. My point being is this...whilst what dugcarr1 did was wrong in intent it is still sporting in a twisted way...all about ADVANCED STRATEGY in a way. Ok I may be stretching things far here but it is possible. Either way I am very much not pleased with the outcome and think it is a mistake. Do I want to play at CC? Sure...however there are alot of other sites I can dominate at... I took a few months off from the stress of high stakes poker...guess Full Tilt is always open...and hey I t\am sure there arent any Commie bastards there.

FREEE DUGCARR1

-Sub-

A fucking men brotha

more players would be turned off from CC if no action was taken.
if the players who support actions such as dug's leave the site, it only makes CC a better more honest place to play risk.

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:41 pm

actualy moron more players are turned off from cc now. Dug did not break any rule. How did he know that he was gonig to get a bann for not breaking a rule. The mods are heads are so far up eachothers asses, that they can't see whats going on, funny thing is, and said that this happened in the forum. it was all pms

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:42 pm

As Andy stated, when Lack set this site up, he could not have foreseen someone would have gone to the lengths Dug did to willfully and negatively deteriorate the gaming experience for others.

The Forum Guidelines are enforced, it just might not always be in public. Many private warnings are sent to people who cross the line. We rely on the community to bring forth violations of the forum and site rules, as we are only but a few sets of eyes.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:45 pm

Hendy, the bans are set up to prevent posting in PMs and the forum... we can't pick or choose one or the other. Since PMs are where this happened, PM privileges were taken away.

And for the record, it didn't matter that it was Dug, a player often misliked (misunderstood?). The outcome would have been the same no matter who it was.

CBlake · Post by **CBlake** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:49 pm

what good does that do they can just email each other

werdna · Post by **werdna** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:50 pm

wow that was a great thread to read. someone should setup a biography of all the things dugcarr has done. i would deffently read it lmao

WERD

Kid_A · Post by **Kid_A** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:52 pm

hendy wrote:actualy moron more players are turned off from cc now. Dug did not break any rule. How did he know that he was gonig to get a bann for not breaking a rule. The mods are heads are so far up eachothers asses, that they can't see whats going on, funny thing is, and said that this happened in the forum. it was all pms

and to think, the site may loose classy people like you hendy.

wicked wrote:As Andy stated, when Lack set this site up, he could not have foreseen someone would have gone to the lengths Dug did to willfully and negatively deteriorate the gaming experience for others.

first intelligent post ive seen in the last few pages

AndrewB · Post by **AndrewB** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:07 pm

I know, some would say that prohibiting dugcarr's access forum is not harsh at all, but maybe just for the normal people. But as for the dug, I don't think it could have been more perfect. He needs the FORUM to exist, he is nothing without it. With a bunch of followers, which put him on the pedestal. He was not enjoying the game, he was enjoying the attention and freedom. Now it is all gone...

And he most likely will stop playing anyhow. Look at his active games he has just 1 ongoing. And also has his tantrum moment with giving away points crap.

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:08 pm

tahitiwahini wrote:Not to further the debate....

but might there not perhaps be a fundamental problem with a political system that has always resulted in repressive institutions being set up in order to sustain itself.

If history shows that supposedly communist regeimes led to repression, then I guess the question that needs to be asked is did these repressive institutions spring necessarily from communism (and efforts to sustain it), or did they result from other factors?

Sorry, my last comment on the issue (hopefully a relatively unbiased one), as both you and I pointed out it has no relevence here and shouldn't have been brought up.

wicked wrote:As Andy stated, when Lack set this site up, he could not have foreseen someone would have gone to the lengths Dug did to willfully and negatively deteriorate the gaming experience for others.

There's the central issue. If the mods had allowed this without any censure than it'd give the impression it's ok to "play dirty" so to speak, and that'd set a precedent, and the gaming experience for everyone would deteriorate as lots of people would try similar "low" tactics to get on top.

Hologram · Post by **Hologram** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:34 pm

Well, it's a good thing that the arguments suddenly got intelligent in the last bit of this whole debacle. ....Maybe it's because dug and his followers are fed up and gone....

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:41 pm

wicked wrote:As Andy stated, when Lack set this site up, he could not have foreseen someone would have gone to the lengths Dug did to willfully and negatively deteriorate the gaming experience for others.

The Forum Guidelines are enforced, it just might not always be in public. Many private warnings are sent to people who cross the line. We rely on the community to bring forth violations of the forum and site rules, as we are only but a few sets of eyes.

Lack is an online game adminstartor, he has to have everything crystal clear. I dont give a flying f*ck what Lack didnt forsee, the fact is he didnt make a rule for this case, dugcarr1 did not break any rule, therefore not punishable. You can not give someone a 4month forum bann for not breaking a rule.

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:43 pm

Also since dug has been banned. I want kilroy and blitz ban. kilroy constantly went along with what dug was saying so he could make dug say more stupid shit and get him in more trouble. Please adress the situatuion aswell.

tahitiwahini · Post by **tahitiwahini** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:46 pm

qeee1 wrote:If the mods had allowed this without any censure than it'd give the impression it's ok to "play dirty" so to speak, and that'd set a precedent, and the gaming experience for everyone would deteriorate as lots of people would try similar "low" tactics to get on top.

Very true.

This seems to me a reasonable punishment for the crime.

Dug could have benefited from Will Rogers' advice

If you find yourself in a hole, the
first thing to do is stop digging.

I guess there's a reason attorneys advise their clients to remain silent.

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:49 pm

BLITZAHOLIC AND CAPT KILROY ALSO NEED A BANN SO MY ABOVE POST^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Fireside Poet · Post by **Fireside Poet** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:35 pm

hendy wrote:Also since dug has been banned. I want kilroy and blitz ban. kilroy constantly went along with what dug was saying so he could make dug say more stupid shit and get him in more trouble. Please adress the situatuion aswell.

LOL - the devil made me do it! :twisted:

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:06 pm

Is Hendy 7 years old yet?

Hologram · Post by **Hologram** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:52 am

Serbia wrote:Is Hendy 7 years old yet?

I think so. He's just one of those foul-mouthed 5 year olds who throw temper tantrums when their idol is treated "unfairly". Also, hendy, you didn't say why you wanted blitz banned. Is it because your idol hates him, and so you do by association, or is it because you want everyone to get banned that was involved with this argument.

Yay for idiots. They make the world go round.

subjekt · Post by **subjekt** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:13 am

UN-BAN DUGCARR1

-Sub-

Madmartigan · Post by **Madmartigan** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:39 am

hendy wrote:
wicked wrote:As Andy stated, when Lack set this site up, he could not have foreseen someone would have gone to the lengths Dug did to willfully and negatively deteriorate the gaming experience for others.

The Forum Guidelines are enforced, it just might not always be in public. Many private warnings are sent to people who cross the line. We rely on the community to bring forth violations of the forum and site rules, as we are only but a few sets of eyes.

Lack is an online game adminstartor, he has to have everything crystal clear. I dont give a flying f*ck what Lack didnt forsee, the fact is he didnt make a rule for this case, dugcarr1 did not break any rule, therefore not punishable. You can not give someone a 4month forum bann for not breaking a rule.

Pretty sure lack doesn't have to justify anything with anyone since he runs the show.

steve monkey · Post by **steve monkey** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:56 am

qeee1 wrote:
XenHu wrote:
steve monkey wrote:thank **** it doesn't

-X

Actually yeah, when I'm ranting about political stigma, I really shouldn't let that one slip by. Anarchist organisations aren't em... bad. There's probably several nearby you IRL but you don't even know they exist.

You've misinterpreted me. My criticisms are not of anarchism, I happen to think it's a rational political philosophy and that anarcho-syndicalism is probably the most effective way of organising for a more progressive future. My comment was directed at The Rogue State and the comment made by Grazing Cattle on page 10 of this thread

"If you don't support it 100% then you are undermining their authority as runners of the site. Since Lack is the founder, he is the trigger man on this.
If we don't support it then keep quite and to yourself about it. that was my point. Once the decision is made we don't need to rabble rouse and try and show that the way we would have handled it is better.

By showing support and respect to the mods we show that we are grateful for Lack's awesome site and that we recognize his authority."

The only point I'm trying to make is that an anarchist clan should not be making reactionary, deferential and pro-authority posts.

(I actually like the fact that there is an anarchist clan - I just want them to act in a manner consistent to anarchist philosophy)

I know it's very off topic, but hell, so is much of this thread.

XenHu · Post by **XenHu** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 7:19 am

Perfectly understandable..

-X

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 7:39 am

Madmartigan wrote:
hendy wrote:
wicked wrote:As Andy stated, when Lack set this site up, he could not have foreseen someone would have gone to the lengths Dug did to willfully and negatively deteriorate the gaming experience for others.

The Forum Guidelines are enforced, it just might not always be in public. Many private warnings are sent to people who cross the line. We rely on the community to bring forth violations of the forum and site rules, as we are only but a few sets of eyes.

Lack is an online game adminstartor, he has to have everything crystal clear. I dont give a flying f*ck what Lack didnt forsee, the fact is he didnt make a rule for this case, dugcarr1 did not break any rule, therefore not punishable. You can not give someone a 4month forum bann for not breaking a rule.

Pretty sure lack doesn't have to justify anything with anyone since he runs the show.

Im pretty sure that if lack just makes up a rule on the spot, then ya he has to justify it you dumb f*ck

hendy · Post by **hendy** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 7:40 am

Hologram wrote:
Serbia wrote:Is Hendy 7 years old yet?
I think so. He's just one of those foul-mouthed 5 year olds who throw temper tantrums when their idol is treated "unfairly". Also, hendy, you didn't say why you wanted blitz banned. Is it because your idol hates him, and so you do by association, or is it because you want everyone to get banned that was involved with this argument.

Yay for idiots. They make the world go round.

YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. first you say that you think that I have reached 7 years old and then you say I am 5

FREE DUG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!