professorapoc AND RiskLiz Secret Diplomacy[cleared]es

[juky]

Accused:

[player]professorapoc[/player]
[player]RiskLiz[/player]




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 8159314



Comments: First 2 people to join the game.
Their strategy seems impossible without considering Secret Diplomacy or Multi.

[Evil Semp]

I will start with professorapox and RiskLiz are CLEARED of being multi's.

As far as secret diplomacy help me out here. Please give me some details that made you think secret diplomacy.

[juky]

OK for the multi, tnx.

Please, take a look at this game:

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=8159314

Look at positions SA1 and M10, this is going on for 3 turns.

I see a great amount of trust between them, an other player noticed it too.

Tnx

[Downey]

I can see where you're coming from but I was terribly bored and looked back through both of their histories and if they are cheating, neither of them is very good at it because no game that both have been in has been won by either party. Besides that I see no proof for or against it.

Good luck with everything!

[juky]

Ok, thanks.

Bye

[Evil Semp]

OK what I see is red is one of the weaker ones in this game along with you. You want him to hit green who is one of the strongest, but you hit red and took his bonus. I understand what you are saying about green having a 1 border, but that doesn't mean secret diplomacy. If I was red I wouldn't hit it either. If you won't let him get the extra troops from a bonus why should he attack and then possibly have green take him out. The way I see it green is hoping for a good neighbor by not stacking on reds border or maybe just part of the learning cycle.

I don't really see how you can expect red to do the attacks for you when you attack him.

professorapoc and RiskLiz are CLEARED.