Makes me wonder: if someone manages to go undefeated in 2 kinds of games (say, trips and quads), who gets to pick whether he goes to the all star team as a triples or quads player?
The Clan Directors pick, If that person went 8-0 in quads but there were 4 other players that went 10-0 or better, then likely trips. Last year there were players with better overall win% that ended up as reserves due to some really strong position players. It's all relative.
This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
well thats bs with strength of schedule..... people dont choose who they play...does that mean someone in a clan who isnt in one of those top tiers clan is weighted higher as in theory they had tougher games?
One of the considerations in Season 1 was the amount of road games, there were certainly a number of strong players who only played on their favourite maps only in that season. This season seems to be a better mix.
Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
jpcloet wrote:One of the considerations in Season 1 was the amount of road games, there were certainly a number of strong players who only played on their favourite maps only in that season. This season seems to be a better mix.
jpcloet wrote:One of the considerations in Season 1 was the amount of road games, there were certainly a number of strong players who only played on their favourite maps only in that season. This season seems to be a better mix.
The all-stars are not that tough to pick historically, the big challenge has always been top player, although with upper game limits, might be easier this season.
Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Chuuuuck wrote:This might help with the discussion, for quads, the following players will end with the following records in Divisions A and B (I didn't take the time to check C or D).
Who do you all think is more deserving? I am honestly kind of unsure, I can see arguments for both.
Easy 1. CoF 2. SB 3. cache
Don't be upset. Jake's dyslexia is just acting up again. He put his bottom 3 up there by mistake.
It does raise an interesting issue tho. Basically Chuck put up the top 3 from each of those divisions that he checked, from what I can see. Is there not a case for getting the top performers from each div?
Lubawski wrote:Any idea of a start date for the playoffs?
Most of the clans should have had a pretty good idea who they were going to face. I'll setup the privs tomorrow and by the end of next weekend most games should be made I think. The original aim was mid-Jan and we were pretty close, didn't see B&C coming down to the wire like that.
AOC and Empire are planning to exchange games on Friday. If you can arrange for privileges for me and Denise (I believe?) by that time, it would be nice
lokisgal wrote:are the clans going to be told what the deadline is for making games? would be very helpful to know when we need this done
Are you going to procrastrinate? Fix it now and have it ready before the deadline
Ours are already decided. We're playing all 9 maps on Battle for Iraq! Our guys are still on suicide watch from those games in our challenge.
You're expecting us to choose Iraq... aren't you?
They still can't get over that on one of our best maps (which we almost never lose) you and Eyestone, who had never played it before, swept them out of it.
(
