Accused:
[player]delahoc[/player]
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In Game 8012429, i was holding africa and delahoc was holding europe. (at least trying) Then he offered me "shall we allow each other to keep africa/europe for a turn or two and deal with the stockpiles?" I confirmed. Even I get 10 bonus troops (spoils) + 3 troops (africa) + 3 troops, I did not attack him. Just after the turn, he attacked me !!!
This made me to lose my advantage. Also gave red extra 5 troops for europe. This is very cheap.
Game number(s):
Game 8012429
Offering alliance and not following[CLOSED]ES
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
beetlejuice_3
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:18 pm
-
beetlejuice_3
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:18 pm
Re: Offering alliance and not following
ok, he apologised that it was his mistake. he just had his turn on a bus - trip and did not check game chat.
i believe it was a mistake.
i believe it was a mistake.
Re: Offering alliance and not following
beetlejuice_3 wrote:Accused:
[player]delahoc[/player]
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In Game 8012429, i was holding africa and delahoc was holding europe. (at least trying) Then he offered me "shall we allow each other to keep africa/europe for a turn or two and deal with the stockpiles?" I confirmed. Even I get 10 bonus troops (spoils) + 3 troops (africa) + 3 troops, I did not attack him. Just after the turn, he attacked me !!!
This made me to lose my advantage. Also gave red extra 5 troops for europe. This is very cheap.
Game number(s):
Game 8012429
Cheap...I suppose. Cheating/abuse...not even remotely.
Last edited by Woodruff on Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
-
support81ghent
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:53 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Gent
Re: Offering alliance and not following
beetlejuice_3 wrote:Accused:
[player]delahoc[/player]
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In Game 8012429, i was holding africa and delahoc was holding europe. (at least trying) Then he offered me "shall we allow each other to keep africa/europe for a turn or two and deal with the stockpiles?" I confirmed. Even I get 10 bonus troops (spoils) + 3 troops (africa) + 3 troops, I did not attack him. Just after the turn, he attacked me !!!
This made me to lose my advantage. Also gave red extra 5 troops for europe. This is very cheap.
Game number(s):
Game 8012429
this isnt cheating or abuse ... its just a cheap tactic which is allowed because alliances arent binded ... all you can do is believe someone by his word and give him bad ratings if he breaks an alliance
Re: Offering alliance and not following
No rules have been broken. The only rule for diplomacy on the site is "No Secret Diplomacy." Rate accordingly and if you like put him on foe. This is CLOSED.
