Israel??

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Israel??

Post by BigBallinStalin »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:So, in actuality, there really is no acceptable solution, except to engage in something similar to what the Colonists did to the Native Americans, which is of course unacceptable by today's standards in this given circumstance.

This IS what will happen, what Israel is effectively ensuring will happen by allowing anyone who wants to be a Jew to settle on these lands AND take other lands/harass Palestniens with only the most minor reprimand, if that.

The West will wring its hands in regret, but nothing is being done to stop Israel from simply taking over all of Palestine and ensuring there just is no place for Palestiniens to go. And, of course, any Palestinien who objects to this process is simply an "ignorant terrorist" who "wants to do away with Israel and all Jews".. and therefore all these actions were, while regretable, really justified.


Well, I wouldn't take it that far. Granted, had Israel been allowed to continue settlement expansion unhindered for the next 100 years, they'd slowly Jewify more of the area, but as we can see, we're probably at that point where it'll stop.

It's really hard to see with good chances about what will happen in that area. It's extremely volatile, and although Israel is dominating now, it's power over the region (beyond Israel) is by no means secure on its own. So who knows?
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13129
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

BigBallinStallin wrote:So, is it right? Is it wrong? It doesn't matter to them because they don't really need to justify their actions too much because the international court and the UN are a joke for those who are protected. For me, it matters, which is why I'm not very happy with how Israel runs their show. But how else would one run that show given their situation? I'd most likely have done the same as Israel, and the same as Egypt.

Questions? Comments? Criticisms?

How does it matter for you? Do you have freinds and or family in the middle east? I have been to Cairo, other than when bus loads of Christians get gunned down Egypt seems like a pretty religiously diverse and tolerant place. I don't know if I'd go to Israel, I would like to cruise around the tourist areas though.

I think it's strange and interesting that most of the Israelis in the military now have been born there. Does anyone think that changes their claim to control the area.

Or if it were possible should they be sent back to where their parents or grandparents came from in the 1940s when they made Israel a modern state?

What if we set up a new Israel in Iowa. It would be good for the 'merican economy and they could use the great lakes for the boats Egypt didn't like.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re:

Post by BigBallinStalin »

2dimes wrote:
BigBallinStallin wrote:So, is it right? Is it wrong? It doesn't matter to them because they don't really need to justify their actions too much because the international court and the UN are a joke for those who are protected. For me, it matters, which is why I'm not very happy with how Israel runs their show. But how else would one run that show given their situation? I'd most likely have done the same as Israel, and the same as Egypt.

Questions? Comments? Criticisms?

How does it matter for you? Do you have freinds and or family in the middle east? I have been to Cairo, other than when bus loads of Christians get gunned down Egypt seems like a pretty religiously diverse and tolerant place. I don't know if I'd go to Israel, I would like to cruise around the tourist areas though.


I'm concerned about small things like social justice and how US involvement with and general support for a nation that engages in such egregious actions at times reflects poorly for the American people in the eyes of the world.

I'd suggest going to Israel. It's beautiful, the people are great, and in all honesty it's relatively safe, unless you're an extremely unlucky sod or you do something dumb. Of the North African countries, I'd recommend visiting Tunis, Tunisia. Beautiful beaches and beautiful women, and a good place to practice your Arabic or French.

I think it's strange and interesting that most of the Israelis in the military now have been born there. Does anyone think that changes their claim to control the area.


Their claim? Not at all. More or less, it's different people within the same army with same strategy for the same reasons, but with perhaps different thoughts on The Situation compared to their parents' and grandparents'.

Or if it were possible should they be sent back to where their parents or grandparents came from in the 1940s when they made Israel a modern state?

Um, why? They're Isreali citizens born within Israel.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Israel??

Post by PLAYER57832 »

BigBallinStalin wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:So, in actuality, there really is no acceptable solution, except to engage in something similar to what the Colonists did to the Native Americans, which is of course unacceptable by today's standards in this given circumstance.

This IS what will happen, what Israel is effectively ensuring will happen by allowing anyone who wants to be a Jew to settle on these lands AND take other lands/harass Palestniens with only the most minor reprimand, if that.

The West will wring its hands in regret, but nothing is being done to stop Israel from simply taking over all of Palestine and ensuring there just is no place for Palestiniens to go. And, of course, any Palestinien who objects to this process is simply an "ignorant terrorist" who "wants to do away with Israel and all Jews".. and therefore all these actions were, while regretable, really justified.


Well, I wouldn't take it that far. Granted, had Israel been allowed to continue settlement expansion unhindered for the next 100 years, they'd slowly Jewify more of the area, but as we can see, we're probably at that point where it'll stop


The trouble is that for Palestine, its probably already past the tipping point. Its hard to imagine that they can have a viable state with the territories they have left, never mind the territories that Israel continues to take.
BigBallinStalin wrote:It's really hard to see with good chances about what will happen in that area. It's extremely volatile, and although Israel is dominating now, it's power over the region (beyond Israel) is by no means secure on its own. So who knows?

I don't see anything happening to Israel. And, if they were seriously threatened, I doubt they would hesitate to bring on true nuclear holocaust. A nation that tells everyone it is founded by God is hardly going to bow down because some inconvenient neighbors want it to leave.
tzor
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Israel??

Post by tzor »

PLAYER57832 wrote:The trouble is that for Palestine, its probably already past the tipping point. Its hard to imagine that they can have a viable state with the territories they have left, never mind the territories that Israel continues to take.


"Palestine" is a sham, a cute logo adopted in order to give the PLO a cute name. Prior to Israel, Muslims in the region referred to themselves as "Arabs." It was the Jews in the region that referred to themselves as "Palistinians." Once the nation got its name, Jews identified themselves as "Israelis" and the term "Palistinians" was up for grabs. Back then the PLO was still in the business of genocide of all Jews in the region. Population density of the area was extreemely sparse. "Refugees" ironically have had the highest standard of living (thanks to UN help) of many of their neighbors. (So much so that Saudi Arabia would import them for their major construction projects.) But all of this is meaningless within the Gaza Strip where the genocide wanting Hammas is using its people like pawns in order to get the means necessary to exterminate the Jewish population.

Real Palistinians want to freely go to Israel where the work is. They want peace, not states. They want freedom, not borders and walls. They have two choices; one is incompitent, the other wants to use them as human shields. They are caught between the quicksand and the hard place. And if you want to know what? If they don't have the balls to do something about it, I don't have the desire to give a shit.
Image
User avatar
Lionz
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:37 pm

Post by Lionz »

User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13129
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

BigBallinStalin wrote:I'm concerned about small things like social justice and how US involvement with and general support for a nation that engages in such egregious actions at times reflects poorly for the American people in the eyes of the world.


My feeling is most of the planet's population seem overly critical of the United States, I don't know how much of that is influenced by the ties with Israel.
BigBallinStallin wrote:I'd suggest going to Israel. It's beautiful, the people are great, and in all honesty it's relatively safe, unless you're an extremely unlucky sod or you do something dumb. Of the North African countries, I'd recommend visiting Tunis, Tunisia. Beautiful beaches and beautiful women, and a good place to practice your Arabic or French.

My list is Scotland, Moroco and South Pacific randoms right now. I was eying Tunisia the other day on the google maps. There's a freind of my wife's family that has moved to Uganda and married a local guy so I'm considering taking the kids there. Potentially bumming around Africa a bit.
BigBallinStallin wrote:
dimes wrote:I think it's strange and interesting that most of the Israelis in the military now have been born there. Does anyone think that changes their claim to control the area.


Their claim? Not at all. More or less, it's different people within the same army with same strategy for the same reasons, but with perhaps different thoughts on The Situation compared to their parents' and grandparents'.

dimes wrote:Or if it were possible should they be sent back to where their parents or grandparents came from in the 1940s when they made Israel a modern state?

Um, why? They're Isreali citizens born within Israel.

The second question was of course exagerated but it kind of ties to the first. I think if Hezbola (sp?) was in Canada launching rockets at the states, I wouldn't like it but could hardly argue against the defensive retaliation. This whole continent was inhabited when France and England colonized it and there's much more of it than Israel. The arabs are just better equiped in their defenses because it's a couple of hundred years later.

I think the people living in Israel now have a ligitimate claim to being there, because they were born there. It's not really their fault their grandparents took it from someone else. While I sypathise with people being displaced. I'm living my life with my kids and I'm not about to go see about my grandfather's homestead. "Hey I want that back!" or try to find someplace in Scotland where an English guy might have chased my kin from.
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2487
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: Israel??

Post by ViperOverLord »

tempest-n-a-tcup wrote:I think the Cananites have the most legitimate claim. Let me know if you see one.


The Caaninites are the modern day Arabs. Jerusalem was founded by the Jews but you'll find that some extremists on their side don't even accept that historical fact. When you look at it historically, how much land the Arabs had to work with, why do they care if they have that little sliver known as Israel? It's not a land dispute, it's an ethnic war and its constantly being waged against the Jews.
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Israel??

Post by jay_a2j »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.

The whole creation of Israel violated most legal standards for countries. I mean, a group of religious folks decide they want this territory.. never mind anyone who is there before, never mind any ties except religion... and takes it.



Never mind that It was given to the Jews by God.

Never mind that like many modern nations, the US included, they obtained territory by way of war.

Never mind the totally anti-Christian stance of PLAYER57832's post.

(I think what God Himself establishes trumps any "violated legal standards") :roll:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13129
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

Why does this seem completely rational to me?
ViperOverLord wrote: When you look at it historically, how much land the Arabs had to work with, why do they care if they have that little sliver known as Israel? It's not a land dispute, it's an ethnic war and its constantly being waged against the Jews.
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re:

Post by jay_a2j »

2dimes wrote:Why does this seem completely rational to me?
ViperOverLord wrote: When you look at it historically, how much land the Arabs had to work with, why do they care if they have that little sliver known as Israel? It's not a land dispute, it's an ethnic war and its constantly being waged against the Jews.



Ah but wait til oil is discovered underneath the land of Israel. It's going to incite another war! But that is as far as I'm going to go concerning the war of Gog and Magog. Live well.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Fircoal
Posts: 19422
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Location: Abusing Silleh Buizels

Re: Israel??

Post by Fircoal »

jay_a2j wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.

The whole creation of Israel violated most legal standards for countries. I mean, a group of religious folks decide they want this territory.. never mind anyone who is there before, never mind any ties except religion... and takes it.



Never mind that It was given to the Jews by God.

Never mind that like many modern nations, the US included, they obtained territory by way of war.

Never mind the totally anti-Christian stance of PLAYER57832's post.

(I think what God Himself establishes trumps any "violated legal standards") :roll:


I think many different people would have different ideas of what God Himself wants.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
User avatar
tkr4lf
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Gender: Male
Location: St. Louis

Re: Israel??

Post by tkr4lf »

Fircoal wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.

The whole creation of Israel violated most legal standards for countries. I mean, a group of religious folks decide they want this territory.. never mind anyone who is there before, never mind any ties except religion... and takes it.



Never mind that It was given to the Jews by God.

Never mind that like many modern nations, the US included, they obtained territory by way of war.

Never mind the totally anti-Christian stance of PLAYER57832's post.

(I think what God Himself establishes trumps any "violated legal standards") :roll:


I think many different people would have different ideas of what God Himself wants.


I don't think he was saying that's what he thinks god wants, I think he was using the Old Testament as a basis for that statement. So, if one chooses to believe the words of the bible, then one must also believe that God did indeed give the land of Israel to the Jews.
User avatar
Fircoal
Posts: 19422
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Location: Abusing Silleh Buizels

Re: Israel??

Post by Fircoal »

tkr4lf wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I should clarify. I am not speaking of Israel itself when talking about the lands "stolen" from the Arabs. I am speaking mainly of the West Bank, Golan Heights, Sinai and Gaza, which were taken from Jordan, Syria and Egypt during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Apparently Jordan, Syria and Egypt decided to attack Israel, which defeated the Arab forces in, go figure, 6 days.

The whole creation of Israel violated most legal standards for countries. I mean, a group of religious folks decide they want this territory.. never mind anyone who is there before, never mind any ties except religion... and takes it.



Never mind that It was given to the Jews by God.

Never mind that like many modern nations, the US included, they obtained territory by way of war.

Never mind the totally anti-Christian stance of PLAYER57832's post.

(I think what God Himself establishes trumps any "violated legal standards") :roll:


I think many different people would have different ideas of what God Himself wants.


I don't think he was saying that's what he thinks god wants, I think he was using the Old Testament as a basis for that statement. So, if one chooses to believe the words of the bible, then one must also believe that God did indeed give the land of Israel to the Jews.


ahzel. I still don't believe that the word of God should be used as an accuse though. My statement still is valid due to other religions disagreeing with this. The West may be Christian but that doesn't make it right or mean that we should treat the world as if it's Christian.

Also to add to the topic I must say that I believe that Isreal should keep the land that it has right now and stop trying to get more. I can understand why ISreal was made and now that it's made and has history you can't really erase it and to try to move Isreal yet somewhere else will probably just create moire similar problems but add the variable of the Jews being incredibly mad. Really peace needs to be made in that area or at least it should be tried to be made. With all the problems that are happening there it does not help that the West is constantly acting as butt buddies with Isreal and enemies to Muslims. They need to treat the two nations fairly and try more to get a treaty worked out or convince Isreal to stop acting as if everything is against them.

I may be wrong as this topic taught me quite a bit but meh. :/
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
User avatar
tkr4lf
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Gender: Male
Location: St. Louis

Re: Israel??

Post by tkr4lf »

Fircoal wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I don't think he was saying that's what he thinks god wants, I think he was using the Old Testament as a basis for that statement. So, if one chooses to believe the words of the bible, then one must also believe that God did indeed give the land of Israel to the Jews.


ahzel. I still don't believe that the word of God should be used as an accuse though. My statement still is valid due to other religions disagreeing with this. The West may be Christian but that doesn't make it right or mean that we should treat the world as if it's Christian.

Also to add to the topic I must say that I believe that Isreal should keep the land that it has right now and stop trying to get more. I can understand why ISreal was made and now that it's made and has history you can't really erase it and to try to move Isreal yet somewhere else will probably just create moire similar problems but add the variable of the Jews being incredibly mad. Really peace needs to be made in that area or at least it should be tried to be made. With all the problems that are happening there it does not help that the West is constantly acting as butt buddies with Isreal and enemies to Muslims. They need to treat the two nations fairly and try more to get a treaty worked out or convince Isreal to stop acting as if everything is against them.

I may be wrong as this topic taught me quite a bit but meh. :/

Nah, you're not wrong. I don't think one can really be wrong on this issue, as it's all a matter of opinion, mostly.

I do agree that we can't view the whole world as christian, but it sounds like he is christian and so I was just saying that that is where he got that from, instead of just an idea on what god wants.

I also agree with the rest of your post. I think Israel should be happy with what it has, instead of pushing for even more territory. I also think Israel should do more to mend the ties with the Palestinians. But as BigBallinStalin already said, that wouldn't happen quickly and perhaps not be viable at all. The Palestinians hold quite a grudge against the Israelis, and probably rightfully so. And as for the peace thing, I agree it should happen, but I doubt it ever will. There is too much history, and animosity between the two groups. There is unlikely to be any one solution to these problems that all parties will find satisfactory.

I also agree America should keep out of it. Our country shouldn't be involved in the middle east at all. Honestly, if we pulled our troops out of the middle east, Afghanistan, Germany, South Korea, and everywhere else they are stationed across the globe, and used that money instead to focus on alternative energy and such matters, we wouldn't need the middle eastern oil and could forget about the problem, as it is most definitely not our problem.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Israel??

Post by PLAYER57832 »

tkr4lf wrote:
I don't think he was saying that's what he thinks god wants, I think he was using the Old Testament as a basis for that statement. So, if one chooses to believe the words of the bible, then one must also believe that God did indeed give the land of Israel to the Jews.

The Bible also says that once the old Israel was gone a new nation would arise that would call itself Israel, but which would not be the blessed nation of God.

... and there are other passages that refer specifically to the restoration of the temple, etc. Point is, you can argue whatever politics you want and claim the Bible.

Me, I prefer something called the "10 commandments* and the one Christ gave us... "Love thy God and love they neighbor as thyself". I believe that replaced the old "follow our way or we kill you" so often found in the Old Testament.
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Israel??

Post by jay_a2j »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:
I don't think he was saying that's what he thinks god wants, I think he was using the Old Testament as a basis for that statement. So, if one chooses to believe the words of the bible, then one must also believe that God did indeed give the land of Israel to the Jews.

The Bible also says that once the old Israel was gone a new nation would arise that would call itself Israel, but which would not be the blessed nation of God.

... and there are other passages that refer specifically to the restoration of the temple, etc. Point is, you can argue whatever politics you want and claim the Bible.

Me, I prefer something called the "10 commandments* and the one Christ gave us... "Love thy God and love they neighbor as thyself". I believe that replaced the old "follow our way or we kill you" so often found in the Old Testament.



:-s So if it is not the Word of God that fuels your faith, what does? And chapter and verse please, because this I have not heard of.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Israel??

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Find it yourself. Might do you good to read the parts you missed the first (few?) time(s) around.

Actually, the Bible speaks of more than one rise and fall of Israel and, like much of prophecy, can often seem to contradict itself. This is because we are not supposed to know the future truly. We tend to understand only afterward.( DO Note the "seem", I am NOT saying I believe it truly contradicts itself, though it does offer people changes in attitude, such as moving from an "eye for an eye" to the forgiveness of Christ). Also, too many people tend to confuse things that are history with prophecy, things that are inexact or poetry/parable with things that are to be taken exactly as if they were textbook facts.

Many learned people in Jesus time were able to recite the verse of the entire Old Testament and Jewish law. They missed Christ. People are like that. We tend to err. That is why Christ told us that above all else, we are to love our God and love our neighbor as ourselves. That means ALL neighbors, not "all but those calling themselves Palestinien", not "all except if anyone gets in the way of this political nation Israel".. no exceptions.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Israel??

Post by PLAYER57832 »

tzor wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:The trouble is that for Palestine, its probably already past the tipping point. Its hard to imagine that they can have a viable state with the territories they have left, never mind the territories that Israel continues to take.


"Palestine" is a sham, a cute logo adopted in order to give the PLO a cute name. Prior to Israel, Muslims in the region referred to themselves as "Arabs."

Yeah, cute. Don't worry about decimating an entire people, just say "those people don't exist!"
Israel has been playing that game since they arrived. After all, had they to admit they actually STOLE land from a real PEOPLE who existed, then it might poke a hole in this entire "God gave us this land" bit. Particularly if its mentioned that a good many of those prior occupants were Christian!

tzor wrote:It was the Jews in the region that referred to themselves as "Palistinians."


You can quibble over the name, but Anthropologists are pretty clear that Palestiniens were a distinct group with a culture distinct from other Arab groups. .

tzor wrote:Once the nation got its name, Jews identified themselves as "Israelis" and the term "Palistinians" was up for grabs.

DEAD WRONG on that. In FACT, there were 2 nations created, by law. Israel was formed of all the lands with a "majority" of Jews. Palestine was formed of the remainder, with a majority of Palestiniens. Note that the "majority Jewish" lands had a bare 51% Jewish presence. The Paletinien lands had 99% native populations. No true agreement to this was reached with the native populations. In fact, they were not even truly informed of the plan.. or that 51% Jewish presence likely would not have happened or would have been far shrunk. This was thrust upon the population by Europeans.

Even so, it was not good enough for the Jews. So, they antagonized Palestine. Jews tend to say that "Palestine started the war". Regardless, they brutally occupied and suppressed the Palestine NATION. Unlike Israel, Palestine did not have European support and was allowed to just die away before it even got a start.

Somehow, a few of those native people decided they were not happy with the arrangements. So, they continued to fight back, not realizing that Europe had already decided that these people had no right to the land they and their great, great, great, great,.... many times back as much as 2000 years (yep BEFORE the time of Christ!, BEFORE Israel was all but abandoned by Jews) had owned and occupied.

The PLO? Did you happen to notice the name? Its the "Palestinient LIBERATION Organization". The PLO did not even exist until AFTER Jewish occupation began! The PLO arose in defense. Funny, you get attacked, so you decide to fight and suddenly you are a terrorist? If you are dark skinned, yes. IF you happen to be white, then .. you are just "fighting for your freedom".

tzor wrote: Population density of the area was extreemely sparse.

Its called being nomadic, living in a desert. Sure, the Palestiniens did not have big farms like Israel created. But guess what? These people survived with their cultures for millenia.

tzor wrote: "Refugees" ironically have had the highest standard of living (thanks to UN help) of many of their neighbors.

Oh, you mean you think that living an a refugee camp compares with living in an Israeli settlement? How about those Palestiniens who had their olive and Orange groves plain taken? How about historic water rights that were ignored. Israel gets the best of everythihng and leaves Palestiniens only what it decides to "grace" them. Sure, they have no industry to speak of.. they are not ALLOWED to do so. Etc, etc, etc.

Israel OCCUPIED Palestine. By UN convention,they were required to respect the native populations, not destroy them. We were supposed to be past the says of saying " I want that land, I am stronger.. you can just leave".


tzor wrote: (So much so that Saudi Arabia would import them for their major construction projects.)

Oh, so you mean the reason we have so many Mexicans working up here is that they have a HIGH Standard of living? Gee.. I did not know that!

tzor wrote: But all of this is meaningless within the Gaza Strip where the genocide wanting Hammas is using its people like pawns in order to get the means necessary to exterminate the Jewish population.

Oh bull. Sure, many Arabs, particularly Palestiniens are angry. Who can blame them. And, TRUTH be told, Israel has no legal right to exist. All claims to it are fictitious and false. Even so, it is a done deal. Israel will continue and likely will be allowed to utterly do away with Palestine. As I said earlier, they pretty much have already.

However, what alternative do the Palestiniens really have? For 40 years, they pretty well bowed down, getting angry, but not really doing much. A few individual fights, but hoping that things would change, believing promises. Then, boys grew up and decided they had had enough. No more waiting. Rocks and stones turned to suicide bombers. When you are desperate, you do such things.

The west AND ISRAEL had a many opportunities to turn it around, support MODERATE, but decent schools, allow and build industry and agriculture. We and Israel declines. Israel decided to simply keep taking Palestinien land, bit by bit, when they thought no one was looking. The west simply could not be bothered, until this war started to impact oil resources. Then, suddenly we began noticing Palestine, but only in very tiny ways. Enough to fustrate and anger Palestiniens with our lack of aid, but not enough to change anything.

Except, we did accept a good many Israeli rejects. Once a Palestinien leaves the territory, as they have been called, they cannot return.. particularly not young males, not even to bury their faither (this happened to my friends).

tzor wrote: Real Palistinians want to freely go to Israel where the work is.

Actually, they would just as soon NOT have to cross and armed border, put up with daily searches and other indignities just to get enough money to feed their families. But, since Israel pretty has pretty well stifled any but a few businesses (and makes it very, very hard for those to make money), they have little choice BUT to put up with the indignities.

tzor wrote: They want peace, not states.

Actually, they want both. Israel has made it plain that Palestiniens are not going to be treated well within any borders it occupies.
tzor wrote: They want freedom, not borders and walls.

Very true. Israel keeps getting in the way, though. AND, keeps taking more and more and more and more land.
Originally, Palestine was a country roughly the same size as Israel. Now, they barely have enough land, land split into 2 pieces, that are by most estimates not enough to make a true viable state. It is a state that will, even if allowed to exist as it is, will always be dependent upon others... and THAT is what Israel wants, not a 2-state solution or partnership of any kind.

tzor wrote:They have two choices; one is incompitent, the other wants to use them as human shields. They are caught between the quicksand and the hard place. And if you want to know what? If they don't have the balls to do something about it, I don't have the desire to give a shit.

I see... so you think they should go out and strap bombs to themselves, too.
Sorry, I think that when we see one nation absolutely BULLYING another, we should not stand back and say "oh well.. its's Israel, so that makes it OK". Israel is NOT a better nation than any other. In fact, it acts a good deal WORSE than most any other nation at present (Korea is worse, as are several other places, but Israel is certainly near the bottom regarding non-Jews!). So much for being a "Godly" nation!
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13129
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

PLAYER57832 wrote:Find it yourself. Might do you good to read the parts you missed the first (few?) time(s) around.

You're projecting and I don't think there is a discription in english for the quantity.

playa wrote:Actually, the Bible speaks of more than one rise and fall of Israel and, like much of prophecy, can often seem to contradict itself. This is because we are not supposed to know the future truly. We tend to understand only afterward.( DO Note the "seem", I am NOT saying I believe it truly contradicts itself, though it does offer people changes in attitude, such as moving from an "eye for an eye" to the forgiveness of Christ). Also, too many people tend to confuse things that are history with prophecy, things that are inexact or poetry/parable with things that are to be taken exactly as if they were textbook facts.

Many learned people in Jesus time were able to recite the verse of the entire Old Testament and Jewish law. They missed Christ. People are like that. We tend to err. That is why Christ told us that above all else, we are to love our God and love our neighbor as ourselves. That means ALL neighbors, not "all but those calling themselves Palestinien", not "all except if anyone gets in the way of this political nation Israel".. no exceptions.

I agree with what you're saying about the prophetic parts seeming to contradict. I also agree that anyone that actually thinks the bible has value in any way should re read it.

I find that a verse you are farmiliar with perhaps to the point of thinking you have memorised, can speak to you in a new and different way each time you re-read it even if it still holds the same meaning to you at the same time.

One thing about most of the bible much like here or any writing but in a much better way for the bible, everyone reads it through their personal filters. The thing I love about the bible is it tends to speak to you in what ever situation you're in while you're reading it. I believe that is why it's been discribed as the Oracle. (I will find that verse if you like though I don't think you believe the bible is a valid source.)

I think the prophetic parts are to a large degree there not to directly tell us what's going to happen so we can just lay down and wait. I think they are there to prepare you to sync your mind and nephish in order to be able to experiance your own vision. Only if unlike you and myself at this point in my life are walking in rightiousness and seeking the ways of the father.

How do I know you're not, same way you can tell I'm not. It shows in the way we respond to others in the forum. Even if you're living right in parts of real life you're dragging yourself down here.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Israel??

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Why does the Bible really matter with legitimizing Israel's claim on its land? There's been a couple of UN resolutions after the Balfour Declaration making this a bit more clearer, so why even bother with the Bible?
User avatar
tkr4lf
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Gender: Male
Location: St. Louis

Re: Israel??

Post by tkr4lf »

BigBallinStalin wrote:Why does the Bible really matter with legitimizing Israel's claim on its land? There's been a couple of UN resolutions after the Balfour Declaration making this a bit more clearer, so why even bother with the Bible?

I don't see why the Balfour Declaration wasn't enough. I mean, the land was owned by the British. Since they were the rightful owners of the land, shouldn't they have been able to do what they wished with it? Even if what they wished was to create a new country for a certain ethnic/religious group?
User avatar
2dimes
Posts: 13129
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Post by 2dimes »

Other than for the Jews and Christians I don't know how you would use the bible to legitimise the claim. What good would it do to use a book that many don't accept.

I supose in theory if it were clearly enough stated I think most muslems claim the bible is suposed to be a holy book. I doubt it's laid out clearly enough anyways.
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Israel??

Post by jay_a2j »

PLAYER57832 wrote:Find it yourself. Might do you good to read the parts you missed the first (few?) time(s) around.

Actually, the Bible speaks of more than one rise and fall of Israel and, like much of prophecy, can often seem to contradict itself. This is because we are not supposed to know the future truly. We tend to understand only afterward.( DO Note the "seem", I am NOT saying I believe it truly contradicts itself, though it does offer people changes in attitude, such as moving from an "eye for an eye" to the forgiveness of Christ). Also, too many people tend to confuse things that are history with prophecy, things that are inexact or poetry/parable with things that are to be taken exactly as if they were textbook facts.

Many learned people in Jesus time were able to recite the verse of the entire Old Testament and Jewish law. They missed Christ. People are like that. We tend to err. That is why Christ told us that above all else, we are to love our God and love our neighbor as ourselves. That means ALL neighbors, not "all but those calling themselves Palestinien", not "all except if anyone gets in the way of this political nation Israel".. no exceptions.




I can't "find it myself" if it DOES NOT EXIST. Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything like, " once the old Israel was gone a new nation would arise that would call itself Israel, but which would not be the blessed nation of God.". NOWHERE.



Fail.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
tkr4lf
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Gender: Male
Location: St. Louis

Re: Israel??

Post by tkr4lf »

jay_a2j wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:Find it yourself. Might do you good to read the parts you missed the first (few?) time(s) around.

Actually, the Bible speaks of more than one rise and fall of Israel and, like much of prophecy, can often seem to contradict itself. This is because we are not supposed to know the future truly. We tend to understand only afterward.( DO Note the "seem", I am NOT saying I believe it truly contradicts itself, though it does offer people changes in attitude, such as moving from an "eye for an eye" to the forgiveness of Christ). Also, too many people tend to confuse things that are history with prophecy, things that are inexact or poetry/parable with things that are to be taken exactly as if they were textbook facts.

Many learned people in Jesus time were able to recite the verse of the entire Old Testament and Jewish law. They missed Christ. People are like that. We tend to err. That is why Christ told us that above all else, we are to love our God and love our neighbor as ourselves. That means ALL neighbors, not "all but those calling themselves Palestinien", not "all except if anyone gets in the way of this political nation Israel".. no exceptions.




I can't "find it myself" if it DOES NOT EXIST. Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything like, " once the old Israel was gone a new nation would arise that would call itself Israel, but which would not be the blessed nation of God.". NOWHERE.



Fail.

Yeah, have to agree here. In all my years of forced christian indoctrination I never came across anything like that in the bible. There is some crazy shit in that book, but nothing like that I don't think.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”