
lol
Moderator: Community Team
Maugena wrote:The Norwegian populace involved a lot more locations than those shown.
South Dakota actually has a decent population. It was that way for A LONG time, so I don't know why that isn't reflected here.
Not to mention, we're spread out in Minnesota... not just in the north west....
Phatscotty wrote:Maugena wrote:The Norwegian populace involved a lot more locations than those shown.
South Dakota actually has a decent population. It was that way for A LONG time, so I don't know why that isn't reflected here.
Not to mention, we're spread out in Minnesota... not just in the north west....
Yes I meant to say the same about Minnesota. Was the first point I had except I just didn't want to get into it too much. I know I live in the city and things are uber-diverse, but in the suburbs minorities segregate themselves to certain zipcodes. Inthe country, Norwegians are severely under-represented in Minnesota (in this map anyways). I also took a Minnesota Geography course, and I do not remember the exact numbers, I just know this map is misleading slightly, or at least in the OP's Title. I am not saying it a "fake"or incorrect, but the it does not get down the the nut-meat of reality. We are just sucking salted shells.
Glad Norwegia could assist me in this
Maugena wrote:
Double Edit: And what the f*ck is "American" anyway?
This map is fucking off like you wouldn't believe.
nietzsche wrote:Its about ancestry not about first or second generation immigrants. At least that's what I think.
I used to think the ancestry of most Americans was English.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Double Edit: And what the f*ck is "American" anyway?
This map is fucking off like you wouldn't believe.
Pedronicus wrote:This is why America was reluctant to join WW2
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:Pedronicus wrote:This is why America was reluctant to join WW2
I'd have bet my left nut you'd get some sort of shot in POP....lol
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
