PLAY SMALL with Immortals ---winner=shoop76
Moderator: Tournament Directors
- HighlanderAttack
- Posts: 10746
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am
- Gender: Male
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (16-32)
There can be only one and I am in
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
-
evilkingjay
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:27 pm
- Location: watch out....Im right behind you
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (21-32)
like i said that i figured that it was random after every game set. well yeh it wud have been stated differently and wud prolly not have other parts of structure ^^
well yeh so as u said that point system wud not matter. that's not true. in other case it wud be like that u play against a guy until other one has lost his lives and get +1 when ur opponent is dead. so faster u finish em, more lives u stack (also related with luck, but more limited that this one ^^ i mean since which guy u get against and if he has more or less lives.) (btw not too bad idea as tournament either ^^), but yeh just wanted to correct u
btw this format cud rly take quite long without that round cap so good that u remembered to put that xD
well i'll just hope that i won't get in endless loop of not getting lives, get eliminated at first round and that i will get as many 3-man assassins as possible for points and lives
(well i just counted that i've won last 10 1v1 games, last 15 out of 16 games and last 21 out of 23 games so i shud not have too much worries about luck factor xD btw i'm most likely winning 3 next ones too to add in those ^^ all sequential (1 freestyle between what i didn't count ^^) well if i can keep that up i might win my first 1v1 tourney if i get rly lucky *snif* i wud rly like to
)
edit: was no intention to brag like don't rly like to do ^^, but i just haven't rly checked any stats about 1v1 games lately and thought that i've had quite nice run in em so i decided to check and i had to check it out like couple times and still couldn't believe that even i cud do that in sequential games even with all the math i know (also know percentages for failing. so yeh quite awesome ^^)
well yeh so as u said that point system wud not matter. that's not true. in other case it wud be like that u play against a guy until other one has lost his lives and get +1 when ur opponent is dead. so faster u finish em, more lives u stack (also related with luck, but more limited that this one ^^ i mean since which guy u get against and if he has more or less lives.) (btw not too bad idea as tournament either ^^), but yeh just wanted to correct u
btw this format cud rly take quite long without that round cap so good that u remembered to put that xD
well i'll just hope that i won't get in endless loop of not getting lives, get eliminated at first round and that i will get as many 3-man assassins as possible for points and lives
(well i just counted that i've won last 10 1v1 games, last 15 out of 16 games and last 21 out of 23 games so i shud not have too much worries about luck factor xD btw i'm most likely winning 3 next ones too to add in those ^^ all sequential (1 freestyle between what i didn't count ^^) well if i can keep that up i might win my first 1v1 tourney if i get rly lucky *snif* i wud rly like to
edit: was no intention to brag like don't rly like to do ^^, but i just haven't rly checked any stats about 1v1 games lately and thought that i've had quite nice run in em so i decided to check and i had to check it out like couple times and still couldn't believe that even i cud do that in sequential games even with all the math i know (also know percentages for failing. so yeh quite awesome ^^)
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (21-32)
Backside wrote:like i said that i figured that it was random after every game set. well yeh it wud have been stated differently and wud prolly not have other parts of structure ^^
well yeh so as u said that point system wud not matter. that's not true. in other case it wud be like that u play against a guy until other one has lost his lives and get +1 when ur opponent is dead. so faster u finish em, more lives u stack (also related with luck, but more limited that this one ^^ i mean since which guy u get against and if he has more or less lives.) (btw not too bad idea as tournament either ^^), but yeh just wanted to correct u
btw this format cud rly take quite long without that round cap so good that u remembered to put that xD
well i'll just hope that i won't get in endless loop of not getting lives, get eliminated at first round and that i will get as many 3-man assassins as possible for points and lives
(well i just counted that i've won last 10 1v1 games, last 15 out of 16 games and last 21 out of 23 games so i shud not have too much worries about luck factor xD btw i'm most likely winning 3 next ones too to add in those ^^ all sequential (1 freestyle between what i didn't count ^^) well if i can keep that up i might win my first 1v1 tourney if i get rly lucky *snif* i wud rly like to)
edit: was no intention to brag like don't rly like to do ^^, but i just haven't rly checked any stats about 1v1 games lately and thought that i've had quite nice run in em so i decided to check and i had to check it out like couple times and still couldn't believe that even i cud do that in sequential games even with all the math i know (also know percentages for failing. so yeh quite awesome ^^)
you only get life by eliminating players from tourney
not for every win
- deathcomesrippin
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Canada
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (21-32)
gosh ye ye i hot that part and all other parts ages ago *sigh* guess u just don't get what i ment >_>
i was just proving that what u answered ("otherwise point system would mean nothing") to me was wrong. as same just said that if it was other way it wud work too ^^
(i obviously understand how different types of structures work. so i wud not ask a pointless questions ^_~)
btw seems that this one is one more tourney with slow start
i was just proving that what u answered ("otherwise point system would mean nothing") to me was wrong. as same just said that if it was other way it wud work too ^^
(i obviously understand how different types of structures work. so i wud not ask a pointless questions ^_~)
btw seems that this one is one more tourney with slow start
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (22-32)
If theres still space left, count me in.
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (22-32)
I'm down, sign me up please
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (22-32)
in please !
- noddy_nuts
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:36 pm
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (25-32)
In please
-
johnboss13
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:46 pm
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (27-32)
in please
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (27-32)
in please.
- Sir Sinclair
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:30 am
- Seamus Corrigan
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:26 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Retired
Re: PLAY SMALL with Immortals (30-32)
In please