demonfork wrote:Before you start to seriously study any version of the bible I would suggest that you first read Bart D. Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus: The story behind who changed the bible and why".
http://www.amazon.com/Misquoting-Jesus-Story-Behind-Changed/dp/0060738170
Then once you have done that and realize how flawed the bible is, I would suggest that you start reading a more accurate account of the teachings of Jesus Christ by picking up a copy of The Book of Mormon.
Ah yes, "Misquoting Jesus" - right up there with "Twilight" as far as "accurate accounts".
Have you read it? I have, and it looks real convincing if you don't check any of his footnotes. However if you do such, instead of just reading and accepting this reheated version of a 17th century attack on the KJV Bible, you'll get quite a different picture. The guy who wrote it is not a scholar and he says nothing original. He's a ragpicker who's profited nicely from the already debunked work of others by packaging it in contemporary form.
Like i said i read it - a couple of former students of mine were befuddled by it and asked me to critique it so i did. I checked a lot of his footnotes and compared them with the conclusions he'd drawn - if you've never studied the Bible yourself and you're too lazy to look into his references you could easily be confused or impressed by it. I have a lot of notes written in the margins of my copy of the book so if you'd like to debate it with me start a thread.
As i recall you didn't do a real bangup job in our friendly discussion on the Book of Mormon.
Honibaz

