Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Iliad »

Phatscotty wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
army of nobunaga wrote:the church ppl would have a fit, but im in favor of a tattoo or embedded chip that has a unique id number, because to be honest I sometimes just jump in the car with 80 pesos to go get beer and icecream, i dont carry id always.

But as far as the arizona law goes... i think it shows how sad america has become that the reaction to a pretty simple sensible law that really doesnt change things all that much.

It was sad. The "strasserists" are in a full court press


ah, here we go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasserism

Strasserism refers to the strand of Nazism and neo-Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, particularly hostile to finance capitalism from an antisemitic basis, to be initiated alongside nationalism. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position. Opposed on strategic views to Adolf Hitler, Otto Strasser was expelled from the NSDAP in 1930, while Gregor Strasser was killed during the 1934 Night of the Long Knives.


Not sure exactly how you feel it applies to your argument, but anyway....

your @$%@#$%# really bothers me. you do not hear what other people say, and you do not think about what you say. I have no reason to communicate with you

Someone's pissy cause they were called out on using a very stupid term. Say maybe you only used strasserists because saxitoxin did [url=http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=117189&p=2597476&hilit=strasserist#p2597476]here[/url. You obviously didn't know what it meant but thought it was some synonym for progressive and now you look like an idiot.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

ya dip I goggles the exact same source you did! I looked it up as any good scientoligist does when they do not know a word, and then use the "secret trick" of using the word for yourself, so as to cement it forever in my lexicon.

I further dismiss you and your interpretations of what people actually say. You are like Woodruff in a civil rights thread times 2.
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Iliad »

Phatscotty wrote:ya dip I goggles the exact same source you did! I looked it up as any good scientoligist does when they do not know a word, and then use the "secret trick" of using the word for yourself, so as to cement it forever in my lexicon.

I further dismiss you and your interpretations of what people actually say. You are like Woodruff in a civil rights thread times 2.

Oh I see, I'm so sorry. You didn't make a complete ass of yourself and expose how ignorant you are. You needed to remember the term strasserists so you used it in a context where you knew it didn't make sense. That make so much more sense.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Phatscotty wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
army of nobunaga wrote:the church ppl would have a fit, but im in favor of a tattoo or embedded chip that has a unique id number, because to be honest I sometimes just jump in the car with 80 pesos to go get beer and icecream, i dont carry id always.

But as far as the arizona law goes... i think it shows how sad america has become that the reaction to a pretty simple sensible law that really doesnt change things all that much.

It was sad. The "strasserists" are in a full court press


ah, here we go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasserism

Strasserism refers to the strand of Nazism and neo-Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, particularly hostile to finance capitalism from an antisemitic basis, to be initiated alongside nationalism. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position. Opposed on strategic views to Adolf Hitler, Otto Strasser was expelled from the NSDAP in 1930, while Gregor Strasser was killed during the 1934 Night of the Long Knives.


Not sure exactly how you feel it applies to your argument, but anyway....

your @$%@#$%# really bothers me. you do not hear what other people say, and you do not think about what you say. I have no reason to communicate with you

I see, so quoting the definition of a word you used is now offensive to you? ... interesting.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Woodruff »

Borderdawg wrote:I like this guy! Arizona Corporation Commissioner Gary Pierce told the mayor of L.A. that if the city of L.A. really wants to boycott Arizona, then the Arizona utility companies that provide L.A. with about 25% of the city's electricity would be more than happy to to sell their product elsewhere!!


I must admit that if Arizona provides 25% of the power to LA, then those folks in LA didn't really think this through very well.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote:ya dip I goggles the exact same source you did! I looked it up as any good scientoligist does when they do not know a word, and then use the "secret trick" of using the word for yourself, so as to cement it forever in my lexicon.

I further dismiss you and your interpretations of what people actually say. You are like Woodruff in a civil rights thread times 2.


So you're saying that he's extremely intelligent, very well-versed in the subject and speaks eloquently.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:ya dip I goggles the exact same source you did! I looked it up as any good scientoligist does when they do not know a word, and then use the "secret trick" of using the word for yourself, so as to cement it forever in my lexicon.

I further dismiss you and your interpretations of what people actually say. You are like Woodruff in a civil rights thread times 2.

Oh I see, I'm so sorry. You didn't make a complete ass of yourself and expose how ignorant you are. You needed to remember the term strasserists so you used it in a context where you knew it didn't make sense. That make so much more sense.

If it helps, I was talking to someone else.
User avatar
notyou2
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: In the here and now

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by notyou2 »

Phatty can dismiss people.....does that mean he is really a school marm?
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Of course I can. I take that statement to also mean that I am able to define the point where someone does not have a clue what they are talking about, yet lying and acting as if they do have a clue. As for me, I just decide at that point I am wasting my time.

suck em
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Iliad »

Phatscotty wrote:Of course I can. I take that statement to also mean that I am able to define the point where someone does not have a clue what they are talking about, yet lying and acting as if they do have a clue. As for me, I just decide at that point I am wasting my time.

suck em

I can almost taste the irony in the air. Say the someone who acts like they have a clue, while they showed they didn't, that doesn't happen to be you does it?
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Of course I can. I take that statement to also mean that I am able to define the point where someone does not have a clue what they are talking about, yet lying and acting as if they do have a clue. As for me, I just decide at that point I am wasting my time.

suck em

I can almost taste the irony in the air. Say the someone who acts like they have a clue, while they showed they didn't, that doesn't happen to be you does it?

show me and I will address it for you.
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Iliad »

Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Of course I can. I take that statement to also mean that I am able to define the point where someone does not have a clue what they are talking about, yet lying and acting as if they do have a clue. As for me, I just decide at that point I am wasting my time.

suck em

I can almost taste the irony in the air. Say the someone who acts like they have a clue, while they showed they didn't, that doesn't happen to be you does it?

show me and I will address it for you.

I already have along with player. Your use of the word strasserists and then your subsequent fit in which you attacked everyone and tried to draw attention from the issue.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Of course I can. I take that statement to also mean that I am able to define the point where someone does not have a clue what they are talking about, yet lying and acting as if they do have a clue. As for me, I just decide at that point I am wasting my time.

suck em

I can almost taste the irony in the air. Say the someone who acts like they have a clue, while they showed they didn't, that doesn't happen to be you does it?

show me and I will address it for you.

I already have along with player. Your use of the word strasserists and then your subsequent fit in which you attacked everyone and tried to draw attention from the issue.

lol, i am still laughing about that. it was a words sax used, and i explained it at the time, with humor. wasnt that on like page 2???
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Iliad »

Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Of course I can. I take that statement to also mean that I am able to define the point where someone does not have a clue what they are talking about, yet lying and acting as if they do have a clue. As for me, I just decide at that point I am wasting my time.

suck em

I can almost taste the irony in the air. Say the someone who acts like they have a clue, while they showed they didn't, that doesn't happen to be you does it?

show me and I will address it for you.

I already have along with player. Your use of the word strasserists and then your subsequent fit in which you attacked everyone and tried to draw attention from the issue.

lol, i am still laughing about that. it was a words sax used, and i explained it at the time, with humor. wasnt that on like page 2???

Actually no and I have already gone through this. Also I think acting nonchalant about this is an interesting change from fit of anger. Sax used the words to describe both republicans and democrats as strasserists, calling them both nazis. You posted in that thread and 15 minutes later you posted in this thread. This was the first time you had used strasserists, and it is obvious from context you thought it was a fancy word to describe democrats. People caught on however, and noticed that you used a word that didn't make sense.
And then you started denying that you made a mistake, claiming that in order to remember a word correctly you needed to use in a context where it doesn't make sense. Then you became angry and started attacking everyone for not having a clue about they were talking about. Humour was nowhere to be seen. Wait denial then anger? Seems like someone is going through the 5 stages of grief. Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance. You've moved on from anger it seems, but we haven't quite reached bargaining yet.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:I can almost taste the irony in the air. Say the someone who acts like they have a clue, while they showed they didn't, that doesn't happen to be you does it?

show me and I will address it for you.

I already have along with player. Your use of the word strasserists and then your subsequent fit in which you attacked everyone and tried to draw attention from the issue.

lol, i am still laughing about that. it was a words sax used, and i explained it at the time, with humor. wasnt that on like page 2???

Actually no and I have already gone through this. Also I think acting nonchalant about this is an interesting change from fit of anger. Sax used the words to describe both republicans and democrats as strasserists, calling them both nazis. You posted in that thread and 15 minutes later you posted in this thread. This was the first time you had used strasserists, and it is obvious from context you thought it was a fancy word to describe democrats. People caught on however, and noticed that you used a word that didn't make sense.
And then you started denying that you made a mistake, claiming that in order to remember a word correctly you needed to use in a context where it doesn't make sense. Then you became angry and started attacking everyone for not having a clue about they were talking about. Humour was nowhere to be seen. Wait denial then anger? Seems like someone is going through the 5 stages of grief. Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance. You've moved on from anger it seems, but we haven't quite reached bargaining yet.

go through it again...
#1 I am not responsible for you incorrect assmumption that I used strasserists to describe democrats. It is ok that it did not make sense, as it's main intention was to flatter Saxi.
#2 I was never angry. Only frusterated monentarily at players continued incorrect assumption, which you picked up running.
#3 It would also help if you knew that I had jut the day before taken player off my foe list, her regular check-up with the Phat One. That response in "anger" was simply my reassertion that player belonged on my foe list permanently. I do not know why you have a problem with that, simply because so many others have the same problem...

In short, mind your own fucking business

I am not denying anything, only laughing at how serious you are acting about scoring some kind of life-long fantasy achievement point against the Phatster.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Phatscotty wrote:
#2 I was never angry. Only frusterated monentarily at players continued incorrect assumption, which you picked up running.

Assumption?

I did not recognize the word, so I looked it up. When I found the definition, it did not make sense in the way you seemed to think it should. I would have bought that I misunderstood had you bothered to explain. That you, instead, got irate and insulting, well, tends to indicate you really did not use the word correctly, that you thought it meant something other than it did.

Either way, it doesn't matter to me. Not sure why its such a big deal to you.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by Phatscotty »

Shut up Strasserist! (my inclusion of an exclamation point cements my furiousity level at 8)
User avatar
stahrgazer
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Gender: Female
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by stahrgazer »

notyou2 wrote:Scotty, the biggest problem I have with it is the erosion of rights of citizens. Can you not see this?


No, I don't see it.

Currently, if you "look like" someone who committed a crime, you can be hauled in, required to submit identification, kept at least 24 hours without any arrest, asked to explain your actions and whereabouts.

If you're driving without a license, (identification) you can be arrested. If you're in the wrong side of town, in certain states you can, again, be requested to show identification.

Failure to cooperate with a law enforcement officer's reasonable request can result in further problems, such as "obstruction of justice" and so forth.

So, Arizona, known to have difficulty with illegal immigrants, passed a law that enables local law enforcement to help combat that crimewave (Yes, it IS a crime, that's why it's ILLEGAL immigration).

Legitimate citizens will typically have some form of identification. Legitimate immigrants will also typically have some form of identification. If they don't, they get a phonecall to ask someone to bring it.

So... how is this an "erosion" of the rights of citizens? Especially since California's had a similar law on the books for YEARS.

(and again, I wish Florida had one!)
Image
gen. asshole
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Location: the hole in the wall mpls

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by gen. asshole »

AZ is just doing what the feds dont want 2
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

gen. asshole wrote:AZ is just doing what the feds dont want 2

Correction, they are doing just what the money behind the Republicans, most Democrats, Liberaterains, so-called "independents", etc don't want.
User avatar
stahrgazer
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Gender: Female
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by stahrgazer »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
gen. asshole wrote:AZ is just doing what the feds dont want 2

Correction, they are doing just what the money behind the Republicans, most Democrats, Liberaterains, so-called "independents", etc don't want.


Not money; votes.

Cracking down on illegal immigration riles up the communities that tend to have a lot of illegal immigrants, so they threaten to withhold votes.

Not all legal immigrants get riled at crackdown on illegals, but many do. I know quite a few legal Cuban immigrants, for example, who want citizenship, and who do NOT want a ton of illegal immigrants from their, or any other, original country. Others, though, get on this bandwagon of "this is anti-(whatever their community is)" (aka, racism). The thing is, it's not racism to require people to go through proper channels. It's racism to suggest that they shouldn't have to go through proper channels just because they're of x, y, or z origins.

I'm tired of paying taxes for the sons and daughters of ILLEGAL immigrants (who are unlikely to pay their share of taxes, because that might get them CAUGHT) to overcrowd classrooms; usurp emergency rooms so that you have to wait 6-12 hours to be seen; eat up whatever monies goverments allow for non-paying customers in emergency rooms. I'm also tired of illegal immigrants taking our jobs, escalating our unemployment rates, filling our roads with unregistered and uninsured vehicles.
Image
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

stahrgazer wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
gen. asshole wrote:AZ is just doing what the feds dont want 2

Correction, they are doing just what the money behind the Republicans, most Democrats, Liberaterains, so-called "independents", etc don't want.


Not money; votes.

It is truly amazing, for all you talk about "government takeovers" and conspiracies, you are truly naive. Money BUYS votes, because too many people just listen to what they are told, instead of thinking for themselves.

You are obviously no exception.
stahrgazer wrote:I'm tired of paying taxes for the sons and daughters of ILLEGAL immigrants (who are unlikely to pay their share of taxes, because that might get them CAUGHT) .


This is just plain false. The ones who decide not to pay taxes are the CITIZEN employers. Illegal aliens actually pay far more taxes than you think. People who come here come to work, they don't come to skip on taxes!
User avatar
stahrgazer
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Gender: Female
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by stahrgazer »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
gen. asshole wrote:AZ is just doing what the feds dont want 2

Correction, they are doing just what the money behind the Republicans, most Democrats, Liberaterains, so-called "independents", etc don't want.


Not money; votes.

It is truly amazing, for all you talk about "government takeovers" and conspiracies, you are truly naive. Money BUYS votes, because too many people just listen to what they are told, instead of thinking for themselves.

You are obviously no exception.
stahrgazer wrote:I'm tired of paying taxes for the sons and daughters of ILLEGAL immigrants (who are unlikely to pay their share of taxes, because that might get them CAUGHT) .


This is just plain false. The ones who decide not to pay taxes are the CITIZEN employers. Illegal aliens actually pay far more taxes than you think. People who come here come to work, they don't come to skip on taxes!


They're not paying their share of social security and income taxes (they can't; they're not registered properly to do so) and yeah, they're coming here to "work" taking jobs away from legal people - legal as in citizens and legal immigrants. They still expect to use our hospitals, but there's no recourse toward getting any reimbursement for the services, which raises the costs to legal people. They use our roads, which are paid for through income taxes. They use our schools, which are paid for through income and property taxes - which they're not paying because they'd be caught as illegal if they tried. and on down the line.

So, no, it's not false.

We can agree, however, that we need to ALSO crack down on citizens who employ illegals.

I'll add one more: we should reopen Ellis Island or some version of it, to make the process for legally immigrating easier.
Image
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by PLAYER57832 »

stahrgazer wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
gen. asshole wrote:AZ is just doing what the feds dont want 2

Correction, they are doing just what the money behind the Republicans, most Democrats, Liberaterains, so-called "independents", etc don't want.


Not money; votes.

It is truly amazing, for all you talk about "government takeovers" and conspiracies, you are truly naive. Money BUYS votes, because too many people just listen to what they are told, instead of thinking for themselves.

You are obviously no exception.
stahrgazer wrote:I'm tired of paying taxes for the sons and daughters of ILLEGAL immigrants (who are unlikely to pay their share of taxes, because that might get them CAUGHT) .


This is just plain false. The ones who decide not to pay taxes are the CITIZEN employers. Illegal aliens actually pay far more taxes than you think. People who come here come to work, they don't come to skip on taxes!


They're not paying their share of social security and income taxes (they can't; they're not registered properly to do so)

While some do work "without papers" entirely, many have them. In fact, the social security payments made by illegal immigrants represent a significant contribution to the fund in some areas. The thing is they will never be able to collect.

And, when they don't pay these taxes, it is because the employer decides not to do so, is often hiring these people specifically so they will avoid those taxes.

stahrgazer wrote:and yeah, they're coming here to "work" taking jobs away from legal people - legal as in citizens and legal immigrants.

ALL immigrants come here to work (no quotes.. they typically work far harder than others, they HAVE to to keep their jobs!), the only difference is that these folks work for employers willing to skirt the law. And yes, they are skirting the law. They are skirting a law in order to feed their families, a law that many see as misplaced.

stahrgazer wrote:They still expect to use our hospitals, but there's no recourse toward getting any reimbursement for the services, which raises the costs to legal people.
This is an insurance and full coverage issue, not an illegal alien issue. They do recieve emergency care and, again contrary to what is often stated, often do pay, in cash.
In fact, most go back to Mexico whenever possible for care, because the care down there (contrary to what many up north believe) can be quite good and is definitely far cheaper.

stahrgazer wrote: They use our roads, which are paid for through income taxes.
again, many DO pay, and when they don't, its because the employers choose not to do so. Also, income taxes are hardly the sole source of funding for those. You also have tolls, gasoline taxes, sales taxes, etc.. which they certainly do pay.
stahrgazer wrote:They use our schools, which are paid for through income and property taxes - which they're not paying because they'd be caught as illegal if they tried. and on down the line.

Again, most DO pay taxes, and again, when they don't the blame is on the employers, not those working. Second, this is one area where you have to look at the long term. NO ONE, no one at all benefits from having uneducated kids running around. The biggest issue is kids who come here young and then have little knowledge of Mexico, but are also not US citizens, able to go to college, etc. However, that gets complicated.

stahrgazer wrote:So, no, it's not false.

Yes, it is, though what you put forward are common arguments.

stahrgazer wrote:We can agree, however, that we need to ALSO crack down on citizens who employ illegals.

No, if you crack down on the employers seriously enough, then there just won't be a problem.

The exception are the drug dealers and so forth, but those cross-border criminals are cheering at this law, because now law enforcement are too busy taking up the easier, otherwise law-abiding folks to worry about the difficult to catch criminals.
stahrgazer wrote:I'll add one more: we should reopen Ellis Island or some version of it, to make the process for legally immigrating easier.

Most of the "processing" occurs before people even come here. The only get on a plane after having Visas, etc already. As for the rest... assylum seekers, those applying to extend their Visas or change to permanent status often wind up in jails, where they are often treated as bad or worse than thieves and murderers.
User avatar
jrl332005
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: PA, United States

Re: Arizona vs. Illegal Aliens

Post by jrl332005 »

I am sorry to repeat anything, but you need to read the bill! Police are allowed to stop anyone that is acting suspious of any crime and ask for an Arizona driver's license (the 'papers' everyone is talking about). Because you need to be a tax-paying member of Arizona to get an Arizona license. So if someone is pulled over for suspision of drunk driving and he/she doesn't have a driver's license (which is illegal anyway) he/she is taken to prison until the accused produces a valid driver's license or it is proved that the accused is illegal and deported.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”