Accused:
[player]matthewpiv[/player]
[player]jeffire[/player]
[player]xxxxxxx[/player]
The accused are suspected of
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 6471409
Comments: very simply these guys have some secret diplomacy no reason for either not to attack each other especially now.
matthewpiv , jeffire [cleared]es
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
- Frankly, my dear
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:02 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
I have been watching the game and there is no way secret diplomacy going on. You control Aussie, have a massive chunk on Bangkok, OF COURSE THEY ARE GOING TO WORK TOGETHER.... THEY HAVE TO FOR SURVIVAL!
Case Closed.
Edit* If no words are exchanged in chat, and they move all of their troops away from each others borders, then you may have a case. They are defending against each other and fighting you.
BTW, if you don't win, you are a total noob.
Case Closed.
Edit* If no words are exchanged in chat, and they move all of their troops away from each others borders, then you may have a case. They are defending against each other and fighting you.
BTW, if you don't win, you are a total noob.
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
uhhhhh ok they went atleast 4-5 turns with no armies on us sa border and 10 -1 on europe usa border and green just reemed blue and blu never attacked back some bs i suspect but i will win total noob lol i challenge you to heads up classic game anyday or 4 person classic game.
-
matthewpiv
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:17 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
I dont know why you are complaining. I have attacked Blue several times in order to break up this bonues. I cant attack both of you every turn.....I think some people get way to sensitive about this and jump to conclusions way to quickly
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
wy hasn't green ever attacked you for attacking him ever
-
matthewpiv
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:17 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
I cant speak for him. All I can do is speak for myself. our borders are pretty much stalemated right now, so i cant attack him every turn....I had to wait til I had a trade in to be able to. But anyone can look at the game log and see that I have attacked green many times and we have no border agreement.
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
Is it hard for you to understand common sense lurp? Simply put, if you have over 70 armies and Matthew and I were sitting around 30 each, it doesn't take Napoleon to understand there's a disproportionate amount of strength for one player. Plus I did eliminate Green last turn so I think that sort of eliminates any possibility of a secret alliance.
Frankly, my dear is right; if you somehow manage to lose you're horrible
Frankly, my dear is right; if you somehow manage to lose you're horrible
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
blah blah blah
Re: matthewpiv , jeffire
I don't see any secret diplomacy, they both attacked each other through out the game. Some times three players games can look like there is teaming up against someone but that is usually the two weakest going against the strongest. matthewpiv and jeffire are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.

