Army of GOD wrote:From my Video Game/ History Channel experience (don't mistake me for a redneck, I live in New York), I'd guess a M4A1.
Are you saying there are no rednecks in New York???? Have you ever been upstate???
Haha, I know what I said was a mistake. I live in upstate, but in Lake George, which is a big tourist spot meaning the people here are "sophisticated". Every town to the west, east and north of where I am is farm, so they are rednecks.
Looks like a MK-45 5" gun of an Arleigh Burke, the deck doesn't look like an Arleigh Burke though. The gun is too far forward...or it could be the angle.
Looks like a MK-45 5" gun of an Arleigh Burke, the deck doesn't look like an Arleigh Burke though. The gun is too far forward...or it could be the angle.
Correct! MK-45 5" gun. This one was on a Spruance class. I was on USS Fletcher DD-992, and a Kidd class destroyer USS Callaghan DDG-994 , both had the MK-45's one fore and one aft.
e chip, you are up!
The Tick wrote:How dare you! I know evil is bad, but come on! Eating kittens is just plain... plain wrong, and no one should do it! EVER!
e chip wrote:[bigimg]http://www.doolwind.com/images/blog/phalanx.jpg[/bigimg]
not sure if you guys will get this one, all I'm really looking for is the barrel size and name. Don't need the model number.
Was topside during a CIWS shoot once, and took pictures of that one as well. Impressive!
Sounds like you had quite a bit of excitement on those Destroyers (even if you weren't in any action a lot of stuff happens on those ships)
As for the current gun, I'm clueless, it looks like a double-barreled shotgun, but it also appears to have ammo clips on it. Never seen anything like it.
e chip wrote:As for the current gun, I'm clueless, it looks like a double-barreled shotgun, but it also appears to have ammo clips on it. Never seen anything like it.
e chip wrote:As for the current gun, I'm clueless, it looks like a double-barreled shotgun, but it also appears to have ammo clips on it. Never seen anything like it.
And mounted too. I have no idea.
Well, you can attach a few pieces of wood to any gun and mount it. You could take a Glock-17, put two pieces of adhesive on either side of it, attach two objects allowing for motion on one end but not the other (to allow the gun to move up and down), attach wood to those or drill holes in the wood for these (I suggest you drill the holes and fit the pieces in them before adding them to the gun), attach the bottom end of the woodto a rotating platform and you've got yourself a mounted glock-17 with the ability to move it in any direction. It'd be completely useless and break down quickly (depending on the adhesive used), but it'd work.
I'm going to take a guess and say a modified Remington 1740.
e chip wrote:As for the current gun, I'm clueless, it looks like a double-barreled shotgun, but it also appears to have ammo clips on it. Never seen anything like it.
And mounted too. I have no idea.
Well, you can attach a few pieces of wood to any gun and mount it. You could take a Glock-17, put two pieces of adhesive on either side of it, attach two objects allowing for motion on one end but not the other (to allow the gun to move up and down), attach wood to those or drill holes in the wood for these (I suggest you drill the holes and fit the pieces in them before adding them to the gun), attach the bottom end of the woodto a rotating platform and you've got yourself a mounted glock-17 with the ability to move it in any direction. It'd be completely useless and break down quickly (depending on the adhesive used), but it'd work.
I'm going to take a guess and say a modified Remington 1740.
This is not a modified weapon. It is as actually manufactured. It is military. It is NOT American.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
