Global Warming: fact or fiction?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Where do you stand on the topic of Global warming?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Post by jay_a2j »

Backglass wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Backglass you hacking into my computer stealing pics of my wife again! ROFL.


I hate to admit it, but yes.

I also found this one of you and the family. It seems your whole family needs that hairspray...and your daughter looks just like you!

:lol:

Image



Aahhh the 80's! Such a good decade. When hair was big, Pac-Man ruled and Republicans held the highest office in the land!
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
vtmarik
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.
Contact:

Post by vtmarik »

jay_a2j wrote:Aahhh the 80's! Such a good decade. When hair was big, Pac-Man ruled and Republicans held the highest office in the land!


I remember the 80s. Back when MTV played music.

The national debt hadn't broken into the 100 billions yet, Black Monday, Reagan taking the credit for the downfall of the Soviet Union...

Good times.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
PE24
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Somewhere I belong...... wherever that may be.

Post by PE24 »

nah i liked it better when the cold war was in full swing when people were afraid to go outside in case a nuke fell on them. :D
User avatar
mikecanswim
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:48 pm
Location: The ether

Post by mikecanswim »

Apparently some scientists have discovered that if 100 nukes the size of the ones dropped on Hiroshima were lobbed between Pakistan and India the soot and ash blown in the atmosphere would block enough of the Sun for long enough that it would eliminate global warming. Apparently it would lower the global temperature by 1.5 c
User avatar
Jesse, Bad Boy
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:13 pm
Location: MY LIFE FOR LUE

Post by Jesse, Bad Boy »

mikecanswim wrote:Apparently some scientists have discovered that if 100 nukes the size of the ones dropped on Hiroshima were lobbed between Pakistan and India the soot and ash blown in the atmosphere would block enough of the Sun for long enough that it would eliminate global warming. Apparently it would lower the global temperature by 1.5 c


Do you have a source for this? I recall hearing once (although I can't place the source, so just take this as at it's speculative worth) that two more bomb drops above the surface would up the temperature a degree, which would prohibit Canada from growing wheat (the only reason why I remember this is because of that possible outcome. It struck me as rather fascinating).
Image
User avatar
Stopper
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am
Location: Supposed to be working...
Contact:

Post by Stopper »

Canada grows wheat? Bugger me, every day's a school day.
foolish_yeti
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: nowhere

Post by foolish_yeti »

mikecanswim wrote:Apparently some scientists have discovered that if 100 nukes the size of the ones dropped on Hiroshima were lobbed between Pakistan and India the soot and ash blown in the atmosphere would block enough of the Sun for long enough that it would eliminate global warming. Apparently it would lower the global temperature by 1.5 c


It's called global dimming- and it's happening at the same time that global warming is happening- mitigating some of the effects. Clouds (and other particles- eg. aerosols) in the atmosphere blocking sun rays- those rays still contribute to global warming but not as much as ones that make it to the ground. Speeding up global dimming is a horrible idea....you're basically increasing the amount of particulate matter in the air, not to mention the decreased amount of sunlight for vegetation, which has an effect on every living organism...

And what is with people arguing against global warming by saying it's happened before...nobody who believes in global warming (worth their salt) is denying that the earth's temperature moves in cycles. There is a natural fluctuation of greenhouse gases on earth- going along with a natural fluctuation of plant and animal life. The earth as a system is set up to handle it's own carbon cycle. However- free millions of years worth of trapped carbon in a matter of hundred years- there's no way that doesn't mess things up... could somebody please explain how they view this having no (or little) effect?
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

The average non-ice-age CO2 amount is about 250-275 PPM - we are at about 325-350 PPM. I think something is wrong.

Plus how do you explain this?

http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid ... 1439772004
User avatar
areon
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:11 am

Post by areon »

Because they aren't willing to admit co2 has a direct effect on global temperatures. Then the US would have to admit that the kyoto protocol is a good thing and should be adopted. The strategy is to deny it until the evidence is concrete but the lag time between emission and temperature change makes the situation scary.
"We spend as much effort on indifference as our parents spent in the war."

Wiesel and others fear this...
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Post by hecter »

People focus to much on just the fact that the earth is getting warmer. That in itself is not a bad thing. The earth goes through natural warming and cooling cycles. The earth has been warmer than this and cooler than this. The problem is the fact that it is happing far to fast. The plants and animals don't have time to adapt and so they are dieing. Another problem is the fact that the melting polar ice caps willl completely change the ocean currents and the climate of many regions. We are causing this by dumping all of these chemical compounds and carbon dioxide ect. into the atmosphere. We are also destroy forests and other plant life with our big cities magnafying the problem. This is a big problem, and we as the cause of the problem should help to fix the enviroment we are destroying.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”