WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Forza AZ
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, Netherlands

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Forza AZ »

Just lost a 4 player doubles game because of the drop. 1 of our opponents started with 16 armies en took away all our bonusses before we could get started, so after the end of round 1 they were already up more then 25 armies and the game was over.

I don't know if somebody already made this suggestion:
The Planes bonusses are unique for this map, so I don't want to remove them, but having the Planes as normal starting territories favours the starting team in most of the games, so I would suggest having the Planes start as neutrals (maybe just 1, so they are easy to grab, but at least you have round 1 to break your opponents bonusses and not having yourself in a lost position before you even took your first turn).
Highest score: 3130 (9 July 2009)
Knight2254
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:21 pm
Gender: Male

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Knight2254 »

owenshooter wrote:
Knight2254 wrote:As I stated earlier the only effective points on the map are going to be the AA guns because they are +1 by holding 1 territory while you potentially have to hold 4 isolated points for +3? This makes little sense to me.

or you could keep the guns at +1, but make the bonus automatically added to the gun... never thought of that before.. as far as the planes go, there are some really good ideas in here. when someone lands on a plane bonus, it is just too hard to get them off of it, and often times it is the end of the game if they hold it for their turn... still love the map... but these bonus updates are an interesting fix...-0



I actually like the auto-deploy +1 to the AA guns -- great suggestion. I would agree that if you wanted to slightly balance this map doing that and perhaps making the plane bonus +2 for 2 held, +3 for 3, ect., would make it more balanced.

On a side note -- we're coming back in a 4 player game right now with perhaps the worst drop I've ever had on Pearl: Game 5733713.

Though I did lose on a bad drop to Chephren and his gang in Game 5719484 which we could do nothing about.
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by MrBenn »

It's been a while since the change was announced - the next step is for the map to be withdrawn for new games. We'll give it a couple of weeks for existing games to disappear before implementing any changes.
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
timl2k9
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 8:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FL, USA
Contact:

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by timl2k9 »

The oil tap is not obvious to me to be part of oil storage, this could use visual improvement.
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by cairnswk »

timl2k9 wrote:The oil tap is not obvious to me to be part of oil storage, this could use visual improvement.

not even with the small white storage tank symbol on it the same as with the legend.
first time this has ever been mentioned i beleive.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Riazor
Posts: 327
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:57 am
Gender: Male
Location: On the scoreboard

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Riazor »

MrBenn wrote:It's been a while since the change was announced - the next step is for the map to be withdrawn for new games. We'll give it a couple of weeks for existing games to disappear before implementing any changes.


Huh? What?! Noooo! We're playing a tournament on it, and its our home map.
Oh, and if any changes HAVE to be made, please consider doing something along these lines (instead of neutering plane bonuses):

Forza AZ wrote:I don't know if somebody already made this suggestion:
The Planes bonusses are unique for this map, so I don't want to remove them, but having the Planes as normal starting territories favours the starting team in most of the games, so I would suggest having the Planes start as neutrals (maybe just 1, so they are easy to grab, but at least you have round 1 to break your opponents bonusses and not having yourself in a lost position before you even took your first turn).
Image
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by lord voldemort »

indeed...though something needs to be done....i dont like being burned on it
Image
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by cairnswk »

This is the new Version 45 with the adjustments.

Image

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/PH/pearlharbourV45L.jpg[/bigimg]

888 images
Image

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/PH/pearlharbourV45LT3.jpg[/bigimg]

This is the xml file for checking.
Coordinates have been changed only for K6.

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/Pearl_Har ... 040909.xml

Small
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... urV45S.jpg
Large
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... urV45L.jpg
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by MrBenn »

The Pearl Harbor will be taken out of play for a little while now. Active games will be allowed to continue; the map will be relaunched and available again at some point on December 7th - the updated gameplay will be as per the update in the above post by cairnswk.

Apologies for the inconvenience caused - there will be some fall-out, but this way the damage to games-in-progress will be minimised.

--MrBenn
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
laughingcavalier
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 pm
Gender: Male

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by laughingcavalier »

Really sad to see the planes bonus being effectively taken away. I've always liked the complexity of this map. Would much prefer to see a solution like Forza's or just making 2 planes a +2 bonus.
I thought the planes won at pearl harbour, so I thought that was why they were given such A good bonus.
User avatar
timl2k9
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 8:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FL, USA
Contact:

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by timl2k9 »

cairnswk wrote:
timl2k9 wrote:The oil tap is not obvious to me to be part of oil storage, this could use visual improvement.

not even with the small white storage tank symbol on it the same as with the legend.
first time this has ever been mentioned i beleive.

Yes. It is too small, and not easy to perceive as a hexagon. It's vague.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Gilligan »

MrBenn wrote:the map will be relaunched and available again at some point on December 7th


Was that a joke, or was it a truth? :P

(FYI Pearl Harbor was on December 7, 1941)
Image
User avatar
InsomniaRed
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
Gender: Female
Location: In Nick's heart

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by InsomniaRed »

Gilligan wrote:
MrBenn wrote:the map will be relaunched and available again at some point on December 7th


Was that a joke, or was it a truth? :P

(FYI Pearl Harbor was on December 7, 1941)

I think that's the point :P If not, good coincidence :ugeek:
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Image
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
User avatar
Gilligan
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Providence, RI

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Gilligan »

InsomniaRed wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
MrBenn wrote:the map will be relaunched and available again at some point on December 7th


Was that a joke, or was it a truth? :P

(FYI Pearl Harbor was on December 7, 1941)

I think that's the point :P If not, good coincidence :ugeek:


Well, who's to say that the games will be done by the 7th?
Image
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by MrBenn »

Gilligan wrote:
InsomniaRed wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
MrBenn wrote:the map will be relaunched and available again at some point on December 7th


Was that a joke, or was it a truth? :P

(FYI Pearl Harbor was on December 7, 1941)

I think that's the point :P If not, good coincidence :ugeek:


Well, who's to say that the games will be done by the 7th?

The choice of date was deliberate, so :ugeek: right back at you :P

A lot of the active games will have finished by then - but we'll be putting reminders/notifications into the game chat of active games so that people are aware.
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
Knight2254
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:21 pm
Gender: Male

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Knight2254 »

Congrats, you just killed a great map.

:roll:
4red
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:57 am
Gender: Male
Location: Adelaide South Australia

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by 4red »

What are you guys doing. The map was one of my favorites. Maybe an acquired taste but I aways enjoyed playing it good or bad drop. There are plenty of maps I dont like and its simple, I DONT PLAY THEM. Please bring it back and don't fix what isn't broke.

Cheers 4red
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by cairnswk »

60 active games still on....migth be a chance that no games will be affected by 7 Dec.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
waseemalim
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 11:24 pm

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by waseemalim »

cant wait for the new map to be on play.
Life is what happens while you are busy playing Conquer Club.
aspalm
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:01 am

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by aspalm »

extremely disappointed. i reiterate my earlier statement that this is one of the best, if not THE best trips/quads maps available. i agree that the drops can be unfair in a singles game, but why does every board have to cater to singles games? for those who complain here's a suggestion: don't play Pearl Harbor in a singles game.

instead we have to go and ruin a perfectly good board. i agree with those who say the strategy just devolved into take and hold the AA's, because this immediately makes any plane bonuses impossible. ridiculous.
Siy
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:00 am

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Siy »

The aircraft bonus was what made this game. I also thought it was to highlight how aircraft where the decisive weapon at pearl harbor. I also will be disappointed to see this map change. Why can't both maps run and let the users choose which they'd rather play.
User avatar
Mustapha Mond
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Contact:

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Mustapha Mond »

aspalm wrote:extremely disappointed. i reiterate my earlier statement that this is one of the best, if not THE best trips/quads maps available. i agree that the drops can be unfair in a singles game, but why does every board have to cater to singles games? for those who complain here's a suggestion: don't play Pearl Harbor in a singles game.

instead we have to go and ruin a perfectly good board. i agree with those who say the strategy just devolved into take and hold the AA's, because this immediately makes any plane bonuses impossible. ridiculous.

Completely agreed. Why the hell not just make a Pearl 2 map? Some of us love it just like it is, "warts and all".
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by MrBenn »

lackattack isn't keen on the idea of having two essentially identical maps up in play. I agree that multiple options of the same map would be nice, but I imagine it would make things a bit too complicated overall?

The real reason for the change, is that enough people have criticised the imbalance of the drop, and the mapmaker wants to make the amendment(s). ;-)
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Redfelt
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: The high road
Contact:

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by Redfelt »

aspalm wrote:extremely disappointed. i reiterate my earlier statement that this is one of the best, if not THE best trips/quads maps available. i agree that the drops can be unfair in a singles game, but why does every board have to cater to singles games? for those who complain here's a suggestion: don't play Pearl Harbor in a singles game.

instead we have to go and ruin a perfectly good board. i agree with those who say the strategy just devolved into take and hold the AA's, because this immediately makes any plane bonuses impossible. ridiculous.


i fully agree, such a travesty, all for some suckhole crybabies
rjwall41
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:05 am
Location: By Nowthen

Re: WWII Pearl Harbor - [Quenched]

Post by rjwall41 »

Why is the map closed?
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”