[Foe] Foe List 2.0 - Customization

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!
User avatar
Anarkistsdream
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
Gender: Male

Re: Allow "teammate only foes"

Post by Anarkistsdream »

I LOVE IT!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
maxatstuy
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Game Foe

Post by maxatstuy »

Concise description:
  • A distinction when foeing someone that enables you to block someone from playing a game without necessarily blocking their chat

Specifics:
  • A separate foe button for chat and for games
  • Game foe can prevent someone from joining your games
  • Chat foe can block their comments
  • The foe that exists already can be left alone and fully ignores someone; and the game and chat foe can be a choice lifted after putting someone on foe so that you can still read their posts or their game chat while not having to worry about them joining your games
  • When placing a mod on foe, the chat foe will automatically be disabled but it would still allow you to prevent them from joining your games

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • There is no reason why someones posts, or comments should be blocked if you only want to avoid playing the person
  • We are currently unable to foe mods because it is important that we read their warnings and comments, this can prevent them from feeling awkward about joining games where they believe that they are unwelcome
  • Some people are truly obnoxious, so while their chat may not be appreciated, their presence in a game might not be resented
..._...|..____________________, ,
....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = = = D
...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//

FARM OR DIE*****!
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Game Foe

Post by Woodruff »

maxatstuy wrote:Concise description:
  • A distinction when foeing someone that enables you to block someone from playing a game without necessarily blocking their chat
Specifics:
  • A separate foe button for chat and for games
  • Game foe can prevent someone from joining your games
  • Chat foe can block their comments
  • The foe that exists already can be left alone and fully ignores someone; and the game and chat foe can be a choice lifted after putting someone on foe so that you can still read their posts or their game chat while not having to worry about them joining your games
  • When placing a mod on foe, the chat foe will automatically be disabled but it would still allow you to prevent them from joining your games
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • There is no reason why someones posts, or comments should be blocked if you only want to avoid playing the person
  • We are currently unable to foe mods because it is important that we read their warnings and comments, this can prevent them from feeling awkward about joining games where they believe that they are unwelcome
  • Some people are truly obnoxious, so while their chat may not be appreciated, their presence in a game might not be resented


Makes good sense to me.
Sun Tzup
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:49 pm
Contact:

Re: Game Foe

Post by Sun Tzup »

excellent distinction. There are many who I would love to beat senseless on the
game board and yet would rather avoid their inane chattering about bad dice and @#$ you you lucky blah blah blah...

In fact these are the people i WANT to beat the most in game.

To have the option of just blocking their chat is quite nice.
User avatar
InsomniaRed
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
Gender: Female
Location: In Nick's heart

Re: Game Foe

Post by InsomniaRed »

I think if this were to be divided, the simplest way would be Forum Foe vs Game Foe (and of course the option of both, if preferred)

I do not think that foe-ing people from writing in game chat yet still being able to play with them is necessarily smart because I feel that has potential to have others bring up C&A threads about secret alliances, when in fact, they just couldn't read their chat! I figure, if you're in a game with someone, you can deal with reading their chat (or you could simply ignore it, if playing games with them means so much to you :P) Now making it unable for them to comment in game chats of your OTHER games which they are not in, I mean that'd be nice, but I really don't see this happening. Too complicated and too much trouble for the limited perks.

I think if this were to be implemented it would be a two way street. You could ignore players from games AND forums, just games, or just forums. I really feel this whole 'game chat foe' is more trouble than what it's worth, but the separate foes (games/forums) idea has potential.

-Insom ;)
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Image
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
User avatar
maxatstuy
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:39 am

Re: Game Foe

Post by maxatstuy »

InsomniaRed wrote:I think if this were to be divided, the simplest way would be Forum Foe vs Game Foe (and of course the option of both, if preferred)

I do not think that foe-ing people from writing in game chat yet still being able to play with them is necessarily smart because I feel that has potential to have others bring up C&A threads about secret alliances, when in fact, they just couldn't read their chat! I figure, if you're in a game with someone, you can deal with reading their chat (or you could simply ignore it, if playing games with them means so much to you :P) Now making it unable for them to comment in game chats of your OTHER games which they are not in, I mean that'd be nice, but I really don't see this happening. Too complicated and too much trouble for the limited perks.

I think if this were to be implemented it would be a two way street. You could ignore players from games AND forums, just games, or just forums. I really feel this whole 'game chat foe' is more trouble than what it's worth, but the separate foes (games/forums) idea has potential.

-Insom ;)


The issue which you brought up is not seen as an issue currently where there is potentially the same risks. When you foe someone, you can still join their games and the chat is blocked so that you dont have to read why your opponent is saying. That creates the same fears as the one which you are mentioning, and even with that possibility hasnt posed a problem, to the best of my knowledge. Placing someone on foe is your own decision and the risks which can occur is clearly the responsibility of the person who made that decision. With that said, a lot of the reason why someone foes another has to do with what they say in game chat, the area which trash talking and derogatory comments are made, not in the forum, so it is the game chat which they want to block.
..._...|..____________________, ,
....../ `---___________----_____|] = = = = = D
...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//

FARM OR DIE*****!
danryan
Posts: 3418
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

Foe Increments?

Post by danryan »

New Foe Options:
  • Forum Ignore
  • Game Ignore

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • There are members with whom you don't mind chatting or reading posts, but with whom you'd rather not play.
  • A game block only would prevent them from joining your game, but you could still read their posts, wall posts, etc.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by Woodruff »

danryan wrote:New Foe Options:
  • Forum Ignore
  • Game Ignore

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • There are members with whom you don't mind chatting or reading posts, but with whom you'd rather not play.
  • A game block only would prevent them from joining your game, but you could still read their posts, wall posts, etc.


A great idea. I like it a lot for precisely the reasons you state.

However, before this is implemented, lackattack should fix the fact that YOU CAN JOIN GAMES OF SOMEONE WHOM YOU HAVE FOED, which has been on his to-do list for more than three years now.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
jesusfreak16
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Location: classified

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by jesusfreak16 »

Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
User avatar
the.killing.44
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
Contact:

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by the.killing.44 »

jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.

You foe people because they have bad avatars?!
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by Woodruff »

the.killing.44 wrote:
jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.

You foe people because they have bad avatars?!


Look at his name...
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
hahaha3hahaha
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by hahaha3hahaha »

-deleted-
Last edited by hahaha3hahaha on Fri Oct 26, 2018 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bruceswar
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by Bruceswar »

hahaha3hahaha wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:
jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.

You foe people because they have bad avatars?!


Look at his name...


Woah what a huge generalisation. I respected you til you said that hahaha. I'm a Christian, does that mean I foe people because of their avatars also?



No but some will and seeing how is pretty heavy into it, looks like does for that reason.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by Woodruff »

hahaha3hahaha wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
the.killing.44 wrote:
jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.

You foe people because they have bad avatars?!


Look at his name...


Woah what a huge generalisation. I respected you til you said that hahaha. I'm a Christian, does that mean I foe people because of their avatars also?


I believe you seriously misunderstood my statement. As a Christian, he will be particularly offended by certain pictures and not be interested in looking at them. I didn't mean it as a put-down, I meant it as an explanation for why he would foe someone based on the avatar.

(Seemed apparent enough to me that I didn't consider explaining it...)
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
hahaha3hahaha
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by hahaha3hahaha »

-deleted-
Last edited by hahaha3hahaha on Fri Oct 26, 2018 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Tupence
Posts: 1860
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:40 am

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by Tupence »

I hope that has been cleared up. Let's get this back on topic :)

Personally I like the idea, though I haven't foed anyone for what they've posted in the forums, so it would only affect me one-way. I wonder if this would be the case for many others?
Important Tournament Notice

The data for ALL of my tournaments has potentially been lost. I am working to recover it but as I am away on business all of this week, there will be some delay. Sincere apologies.
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by AAFitz »

Woodruff wrote:
danryan wrote:New Foe Options:
  • Forum Ignore
  • Game Ignore

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • There are members with whom you don't mind chatting or reading posts, but with whom you'd rather not play.
  • A game block only would prevent them from joining your game, but you could still read their posts, wall posts, etc.


A great idea. I like it a lot for precisely the reasons you state.

However, before this is implemented, lackattack should fix the fact that YOU CAN JOIN GAMES OF SOMEONE WHOM YOU HAVE FOED, which has been on his to-do list for more than three years now.


Or at least provide the warning to give you the option of not joining.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
User avatar
TurinTurambar
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:33 pm

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by TurinTurambar »

jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.

Another option for you:
Under control panel, you can turn off the option to show avatars and signatures.
[bigimg]http://i717.photobucket.com/albums/ww180/Nicky1537/The_Agents222-1-2-1.gif[/bigimg]

"Not all who wander are lost." - Bilbo Baggins, of Aragorn son of Arathorn.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Foe Increments?

Post by Woodruff »

TurinTurambar wrote:
jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea! 8-)
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.

Another option for you:
Under control panel, you can turn off the option to show avatars and signatures.


Excellent call - I had forgotten about that.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
king sam
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
Gender: Male

[Foe] Game, Forum, and Chat Foes

Post by king sam »

Foe Options:
  • Currently you run across a player that annoys you in the game, in chat or in the forums and you can choose to Foe them and eliminate the necessity to see their posts, see their game chat or have them join a game with you. The proposition here is that you can mitigate what areas you wish to ignore the player on. Also the current Foe system allows users that you have on Foe to not join a game that you are already in, but it doesnt let you know if your joining a game with someone you have Foed. I dont even know if a script can be made to allow you to manipulate the Foe system to choose what areas of the site you wish to ignore a player on but figured it was worth the suggestion.

Specifics:
  • Instead of just having a text box for a reminder of why you are Foe'ing someone you would have these options:
    • Foe games involving this player
    • Foe forum posts involving this player
    • Foe game chat involving this player
  • Add an additional measure to not allow you to join games with players that are on your Foe system, or some kind of pop up alert to let you know you are about to join a game that has someone in it that is on your current Foe list

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • Just a creature feature

KS
Image
danryan
Posts: 3418
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Foe options

Post by danryan »

Absolutely support this, it would be a fantastic addition to the site!
User avatar
squishyg
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:05 pm
Gender: Female

Re: Foe options

Post by squishyg »

i definitely agree that this whole foe list thing could be tweaked. i'd actually like to see it go away altogether, but at least this will help people to use it more sensibly.
Image
There is no fog rule and I am no gentleman.
Robinette wrote:
Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?

Depends on what metric you use...
The coolest is [player]squishyg[/player]
Coler
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:19 am
Gender: Male

Re: Foe options

Post by Coler »

Yep I support this.

I hardly foe anyone - has to be extreme and I don't do it for gameplay except for suiciders/deadbeats - I don't want to close people out of games and I don't want to stop playing people just because they are rude, but I would like the option to ignore them in game chat and still play them.
User avatar
fumandomuerte
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: The Cinderella of the Pacific

Re: Foe options

Post by fumandomuerte »

Image
Thanks to the CC staff for the perma-ban on [player]۩░▒▓₪№™℮₪▓▒░۩[/player]!
User avatar
king sam
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
Gender: Male

Re: Foe options

Post by king sam »

fumandomuerte wrote:I support this.
Check this other suggestion http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=114299&start=0.


sorry fumandomuerte I honestly just scammed the suggs forum and didnt see anything like this I didnt do a big search.

KS
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions”