Snorri1234 wrote:john9blue wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Seriously? Aside from obvious gamekillers like Metaknight the amount of training to get good at someone has become even higher.
No way... Melee has a lot more advanced techniques. The game's been explored for 8 years as opposed to Brawl's 2. In fact I think the developer specifically designed Brawl to have shallower gameplay than Melee.
That's only one game though. The GC as a whole I think had slightly better games than the Wii, but obviously was sold to a narrower market. Nintendo needs to use all the Wii money to design a killer console next-gen with fantastic games, because Wii owners aren't going to buy the Wii 2 just for some upgraded graphics and a faster processor.
More advanced techniques? Like what? It's not like brawl actually changed much of the controls or game-mechanics. They added and removed a few things but we'd have to go into some serious nerd-discussion about that shit.
As for the GC, most games were worse especially Mario Sunshine.
Oh, I could go totally nerd right now. Physics engine, hitboxes, a lot more than you might think got changed. But I won't get into that unless I have to. GC had a few good games, like Wind Waker, but the console itself was too generic as far as game consoles go. Plus, it didn't have the processing power to run games with high graphics levels (the Wii can't run them either, the best I think the Wii can do in terms of HD is 480p) and size constraints caused some larger games to go to 2 discs. You do have to give Nintendo credit on its physical durability. That thing is a tank.
The mere fact that this thread has gone off topic to which Nintendo console is best is proof that Nintendo will not die any time soon.