zebraman wrote: The scary thing is I'm actually beginning to understand Jimbo's reasoning despite his lack of phonetic coherence. I agree that his posts are probably the most entertaining on this whole site.
Okay that right there is a sure sign of too much internet. Turn off the computer and step slowly away.
Titanic wrote: The big bang created the universe, but it didn't create this. Your theory means that I could say that the Treaty of Versailles created the fall of the Berlin Wall.
They were the first organisms, and they evolved into more advanced cuttlefish, which evolved into worms, which evolved into fish, who transitioned to land. Look it up.
Simon Viavant wrote:Yeah, JJ, everyone knows it's squid.
They were the first organisms, and they evolved into more advanced cuttlefish, which evolved into worms, which evolved into fish, who transitioned to land. Look it up.
Heresy, it started with Dolphins, that's why they're mammals that swim.
No, the fossil record clearly traces dolphins, porpoises and seals from land mammals, otters are the link between them and larger rodents. Scientists have found a record of this in fossils by the pacific shelf. It was in the 1967 Stevenson Discovery of the shores of San Fransisco, you can read his original papers about it in the University of Berkeley Archives at the UCBerkeley website.
Simon Viavant wrote:No, the fossil record clearly traces dolphins, porpoises and seals from land mammals, otters are the link between them and larger rodents. Scientists have found a record of this in fossils by the pacific shelf. It was in the 1967 Stevenson Discovery of the shores of San Fransisco, you can read his original papers about it in the University of Berkeley Archives at the UCBerkeley website.
Really? Life originated in the sea, I though land animals ame frm sea animals?
Simon Viavant wrote:No, the fossil record clearly traces dolphins, porpoises and seals from land mammals, otters are the link between them and larger rodents. Scientists have found a record of this in fossils by the pacific shelf. It was in the 1967 Stevenson Discovery of the shores of San Fransisco, you can read his original papers about it in the University of Berkeley Archives at the UCBerkeley website.
Really? Life originated in the sea, I though land animals ame frm sea animals?
Nooo, that has been debunked long ago, the squids and dolphins came here (to earth) in there spaceships 437 squillion years ago but had unfortunately forgotten to build in a mechanism for landing so they crashed and couldn't go back. A majority of the squids settled in what is now Japan (which is why the Japanese have an obsession with tentacles) and spread civilization from there. The dolphins decided to have a good time and went for a swim instead.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
JJM wrote:1. If you do not believe in god then how do you think the Bible predicted that Israel would once again become a nation?
The Bible can be interpreted many ways... So can Nostradamus' prophecies... Many of his prophecies have come true too... So what?
2.If You believe we were created by a "big bang" then why our all our body symmetrical.
Aside from the horrible typos, this one is easy... We are only symmetrical one way... So what does that say? Nothing... We are not a perfect sphere... In fact, perfect spheres don't exist. If God made us, then wouldn't he have created perfection?
What about every other creature, plant, mineral, etc that is not symmetrical?
How do you explain fossils? Did Jesus ride a dinosaur?
Why don't you go hang out with Kirk Cameron or some other moron..?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
JJM wrote:how do you think the Bible predicted that Israel would once again become a nation?
Where does it say this?
Sorry I over read your question. The book of Revolation.
Revolution?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
jonesthecurl wrote:Do you actually know anything about Darwin?
All I know for sure is he has fallen victim to natural selection.
i know quiet a bit about Darwin.
What, like his theories begin with fish, or possibly worms?
Eels!
Tentacles!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
BTW, JJM., i know that people tend to mock you - but I do think you know quite a lot about certain subjects. Here, though, you are just floundering in the dark. Oh, and flounders aren't symmetrical.