Im not suprised if it happens. Its prety logical. People who have premium and play a lot are the ones who also cost a lot. (server memory) Therefore its prety logical that when you do make a living out off this site, you'd better make it most unattractive to those who causes the LAG. If you don't make it unattractive you soon have to invest in a new server which is unlikely because is makes your netto income much lower. New premiums are harder to get so it will not benefit buying a new server. CC = Comercial Club. For those who even think this site is for your amusement.
All about money an nothing else. But i will pay for it because i like the game and the most off the members who play here.
timthetuneman wrote:I don't know how you did it... nor do I care... But i KNOW that somehow CC has given me shit dice... I have a dice analyzer that CONSISTANTLY proves that my dice are 10% or more worse than average... I spoke to one of the top players who knows the creator of CC... and he says it is likely that somebody in authority doesn't like me because I swear and curse a lot and have generated a number of complaints...
I have analyzed and averaged my dice rolls over the past 100 games.. and I am CONSISTANTLY getting crap rolls... I wont name the GENERAL who was completely amazed by this FACT and told me some inside information that convinces me that CC is intentionally making my dice bad to get rid of me...
It worked... I won't be renewing my premium membership... I will tell others of my experience... Don't bother to lie to me... if you can't admit the truth then just don't respond... If you plan to deny it and tell me that the dice program is random and all that crap you will be lying... My final request is... just don't fucking lie to me... Either admit that I am being punished... or don't bother to respond...
One other thing... you STILL haven't fixed the D-Day map...
qwert wrote:well i think that only 2-3 % of people get more good dices then all others,and this is why they have big ranks. Dices create games here in CC,and strategy have little impact(except when you play with new players who dont have experience).
hmm... so, i was at 3100 points or so...I was there for a month, maybe two... now in two weeks I have 2000 points...
Was it my dice that was responsible for my crash. By your theory that must have been it...but since I know why I lost the points...and personally feel Ive had great luck lately...
is this some random exception to the rule, or is your theory bunk? If youre not sure, pm me. I have the answer.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
qwert wrote:well i think that only 2-3 % of people get more good dices then all others,and this is why they have big ranks. Dices create games here in CC,and strategy have little impact(except when you play with new players who dont have experience).
qwert makes it squirt
Sorry about your little butt ✪ Dumb fucking e-lambs the lot of you
2009-07-28 20:29:44 - xxxxxxx: bad luck. I must be due a bad run. 2009-07-28 20:37:35 - xxxxxxx: without a premium membership ... i doubt it... they want you to be hapy with the dice so you will pay for an account ... and then the shit hits the fan... i always lose to you non-premium players
Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
Fruitcake wrote:I saw this as a sign off to a game....
2009-07-28 20:29:44 - xxxxxxx: bad luck. I must be due a bad run. 2009-07-28 20:37:35 - xxxxxxx: without a premium membership ... i doubt it... they want you to be hapy with the dice so you will pay for an account ... and then the shit hits the fan... i always lose to you non-premium players
Night Strike wrote:Maybe you and [player]RADAGA[/player] should start a clan: The Below-Average Dice Throwers.
if you ask me this is a discriminating and prejudiced remark made by nightstrike against lesser ranked players. Nightstrike as a moderator you should be more tolerant, lesser ranked does not make one any less of a human being, coming from a highly respected moderator such as you, your words are more hurtful than most.
I suggest you take this as public warning that this action will not be tolerated by the c.c. community.
Night Strike wrote:Maybe you should start a clan: The Below-Average Dice Throwers.
BAD dudesha ha ha!
I lost 16 armies to 3 different single defender territories last night... S H I T H A P P E N S ! but that merely balances out the good rolls against well forted ones. S O M E T I M E S G O O D S H I T .
If we look at it from a logical standpoint, you only have a 33.3 percent chance of getting "good" dice (5,6) however, if you classify "good" as winning, then you are going to have to dig throgh 7776 possible dice combinations of 3v2, or 1296 for three on one, which is where most attackers squeel. One on one, out of 36 combos, only 15 will win. That's roughly around fourty percent. Most of the time, the odds are against you. Deal with it, pal
Woop Woop, i love conquer club, why'd i leave for a year? Who LIkes finishing what they started?
Oh yay. Another fucking sergeant, whining that he can raise his rank because of the dice. "I lost 14 v 1 one time and that's why every game is decided by dice". It's time somebody told you the cold hard truth, you loose because someone else is better than you. Or in your case, a lot of people are better than you. I'm sorry, I know it hurts, but you had to hear it.
I don't believe for one minute that anyone intentionally tampers with the dice rolls but I have to admit that I do have a terrible feeling that something is wrong with the system employed.
I have read in depth about the how the rolls are generated and it seems to be a perfectly fine system, the problem is that I have witnessed far too many events that should never happen or only ever happen once in a lifetime and I have only been playing on this site for a few months. I have not sat down and worked out the odds but I have witnessed several events which must have had a probability of well over several million to one of occurring. Another very noticable variation between this site and the board game is that you win a 2v1 or 1v1 far less frequently than when playing live.
Now I am sure that if you analysed the complete list of numbers used from random.org you would find the correct distribution of values but there does appear to be very long streaks that defy the theory.
Just out of interest I would love to hear some of the worst defeats or most statistically unlikely events that people have witnessed. Quite frankly I do not believe some of the ones I have read on other posts because the chances of something like losing a 100 v 10 occurring (not sure about the exact numbers but it was that ballpark) are so astronomically high that it should never happen in the lifetime of the site.
captainwalrus wrote:But with dice rolls there are no "events that should never happen" When you have millions of rolls you are bound to get some crazy shit.
Yeah I agree completely, you can never rule out a very unlikely event but it's the frequency with which these events occur that troubles me.
