Seems great!
Though something worries me:
Isn’t Europe to hard to support?
One of the problems in the classic Risk was that Europe being in the centre of the (action) was very hard to protect – but now with an income of 3 seems even harder (you’ve designed it with 4 borders isn’t so?)
World 1½
Moderator: Cartographers
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Kabanellas
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:21 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Porto, Portugal
-
rdsrds2120
- Posts: 6274
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am
- Gender: Male
Re: World 1½
I like the map. But I don't think Asia should get that bonus, maybe 6 or 7. It's only 1 territory bigger than N.A and has the same number of border territories to keep it. So an extra 3 to Asia compared to NA doesn't seem appropriate. It looks great though! I wanna play it when it goes through.
Re: World 1½
i like it. better than 2.1 cuase there ain't 180 territories
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
-
whitestazn88
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: behind you
- Contact:
Re: World 1½
colton24 wrote:i like it. better than 2.1 cuase there ain't 180 territories
there are only 113 territories in 2.1 (i think... maybe 114, this is from memory...)
Re: World 1½
I really like john9blue's version.
And klapowitz, why is Bolivia in Eastern Europe? Shouldn't that be Poland or Belarus?
And klapowitz, why is Bolivia in Eastern Europe? Shouldn't that be Poland or Belarus?