Alternate Fortification

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
cranberrysucks
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:59 am

Alternate Fortification

Post by cranberrysucks »

I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?
Strife
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Strife »

cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?

No it is not. Next time, for a post of this stature, please post it in sugs and bugs(suggestions and but reports). I realize it is also a question though.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Woodruff »

cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?


Personally, I think the first round is the absolutely WORST time to have unlimited fortification. I don't mind it after the first turn, but it gives a TREMENDOUS advantage to whomever is going first (without the other party having some opportunity to dampen the effect). So I'd almost think the opposite of your suggestion would be better (at least, for me).

Strife wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?

No it is not. Next time, for a post of this stature, please post it in sugs and bugs(suggestions and but reports). I realize it is also a question though.


I'm curious as to why you state unequivocably that it is not possible...
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
whitestazn88
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: behind you
Contact:

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by whitestazn88 »

Woodruff wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?


Personally, I think the first round is the absolutely WORST time to have unlimited fortification. I don't mind it after the first turn, but it gives a TREMENDOUS advantage to whomever is going first (without the other party having some opportunity to dampen the effect). So I'd almost think the opposite of your suggestion would be better (at least, for me).

Strife wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?

No it is not. Next time, for a post of this stature, please post it in sugs and bugs(suggestions and but reports). I realize it is also a question though.


I'm curious as to why you state unequivocably that it is not possible...


He states that it is impossible because the original question asks if there is even an option for this. Unfortunately, there is no option for a "unlimited fortifications on first turn then ______ for the rest of the game". I think it is perfectly reasonable that he says that it isn't possible.

As for the original question, I agree with spock when he says that it would not be sound to allow unlimited fortifications during the first round, as it would indeed give the first player a tremendous advantage.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Woodruff »

whitestazn88 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?


Personally, I think the first round is the absolutely WORST time to have unlimited fortification. I don't mind it after the first turn, but it gives a TREMENDOUS advantage to whomever is going first (without the other party having some opportunity to dampen the effect). So I'd almost think the opposite of your suggestion would be better (at least, for me).

Strife wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?

No it is not. Next time, for a post of this stature, please post it in sugs and bugs(suggestions and but reports). I realize it is also a question though.


I'm curious as to why you state unequivocably that it is not possible...


He states that it is impossible because the original question asks if there is even an option for this. Unfortunately, there is no option for a "unlimited fortifications on first turn then ______ for the rest of the game". I think it is perfectly reasonable that he says that it isn't possible.


It seems very clear to me that he's asking if that's "an option that could be added", not "an option that already exists. I say this because he states "However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree?", which definitely appears to be his suggesting that it's something he'd like to see happen and is hoping to round up some support for it.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Robinette »

:o Wow... when i saw this thread it looked to me like it said:

Alternate Fornication


I wasn't even going to click on it.. but then i got real curious.... 8-[
And then i laughed at myself :D


On Topic...

I think the 3 fort choices are fine...
My preference is Adjacent, as it requires more planning
Next is Chained, because it's hard to get people to join my Adj games
Unlimited is... well... it just makes things too easy
Image
whitestazn88
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: behind you
Contact:

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by whitestazn88 »

Woodruff wrote:
whitestazn88 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?


Personally, I think the first round is the absolutely WORST time to have unlimited fortification. I don't mind it after the first turn, but it gives a TREMENDOUS advantage to whomever is going first (without the other party having some opportunity to dampen the effect). So I'd almost think the opposite of your suggestion would be better (at least, for me).

Strife wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?

No it is not. Next time, for a post of this stature, please post it in sugs and bugs(suggestions and but reports). I realize it is also a question though.


I'm curious as to why you state unequivocably that it is not possible...


He states that it is impossible because the original question asks if there is even an option for this. Unfortunately, there is no option for a "unlimited fortifications on first turn then ______ for the rest of the game". I think it is perfectly reasonable that he says that it isn't possible.


It seems very clear to me that he's asking if that's "an option that could be added", not "an option that already exists. I say this because he states "However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree?", which definitely appears to be his suggesting that it's something he'd like to see happen and is hoping to round up some support for it.


That makes sense, but then if he were really trying to get something done, he should have posted in Suggs and Bugs. Posting here will not make it possible, ever.
Strife
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Strife »

whitestazn88 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?


Personally, I think the first round is the absolutely WORST time to have unlimited fortification. I don't mind it after the first turn, but it gives a TREMENDOUS advantage to whomever is going first (without the other party having some opportunity to dampen the effect). So I'd almost think the opposite of your suggestion would be better (at least, for me).

Strife wrote:
cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?

No it is not. Next time, for a post of this stature, please post it in sugs and bugs(suggestions and but reports). I realize it is also a question though.


I'm curious as to why you state unequivocably that it is not possible...


He states that it is impossible because the original question asks if there is even an option for this. Unfortunately, there is no option for a "unlimited fortifications on first turn then ______ for the rest of the game". I think it is perfectly reasonable that he says that it isn't possible.


I apologize for the late reply to my part there. whitestazn88 was right, that's what I was referring to. I have no intention of outputting my opinion if it's not an actual suggestion. 8-[
User avatar
clapper011
Posts: 7208
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
Gender: Female
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by clapper011 »

moved to suggs and bugs ;)
Strife
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Strife »

clapper011 wrote:moved to suggs and bugs ;)

Trying to get me to put forth my opinion? :evil:

Anyway, I don't really think it would be useful on big maps. But it would be great for when all of your territs start right next to each other in a great way and you have a very dominant position already. :D
User avatar
azezzo
Posts: 971
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:54 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New York state, by way of Chicago

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by azezzo »

Robinette wrote::o Wow... when i saw this thread it looked to me like it said:

Alternate Fornication


I wasn't even going to click on it.. but then i got real curious.... 8-[
And then i laughed at myself :D


On Topic...

I think the 3 fort choices are fine...
My preference is Adjacent, as it requires more planning
Next is Chained, because it's hard to get people to join my Adj games
Unlimited is... well... it just makes things too easy


damn robinette, you beat me to it.
cranberrysucks
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:59 am

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by cranberrysucks »

I was asking if it were possible to create the option, I realize that may not have been clear. Another thing I was thinking is having X number of turns that you can use unlimited forts. Even if it were just one.
Strife
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Strife »

cranberrysucks wrote:I was asking if it were possible to create the option, I realize that may not have been clear. Another thing I was thinking is having X number of turns that you can use unlimited forts. Even if it were just one.

We realize that, so please fill out this form so the lack can find out, by telling us what you really want and why you think it might be useful. At the moment it is not an option though.


Code: Select all

<DELETE ME>
PLACE A CONCISE DESCRIPTION OF THE SUGGESTION OR BUG IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

The dice ARE random, lots and lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and by community members.

Search for previous suggestion or bug reports and check stickies before posting something "new".

Delete or replace any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any entires which do not apply.
</DELETE ME>

[b]Concise description:[/b]
[list]
[*]xxxxxxx
[/list]

[b]Specifics:[/b]
[list]
[*]xxxxxxx
[/list]

[b]This will improve the following aspects of the site:[/b]
[list]
[*]xxxxxxx (you can obviously delete this for bug reports)
[*]xxxxxxx
[/list]
User avatar
colton24
Posts: 1935
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alabama

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by colton24 »

cranberrysucks wrote:I personally hate unlimited fortification. However, I would actually like the option of having unlimited fortifications in the 1st round only. Does anyone else agree? Is this option even possible?


1.) NO the idea is stupid espacialy if u have multiple points at risk
2.)......crap forgot what this one was going to be
cranberrysucks
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:59 am

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by cranberrysucks »

My thinking behind the unlimited just in the 1st round was to give people with very poor drops to at least try set something up for themselves. Just a thought.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Robinette »

cranberrysucks wrote:My thinking behind the unlimited just in the 1st round was to give people with very poor drops to at least try set something up for themselves. Just a thought.



mnnnn... very poor drops might also include no adjacent territories... might just give even more advantage to some over others...

Sounds like what you would prefer is a little less random start, like the old board game where you picked your territories one at a time... unfeasible here, but maybe it could be random territories with 2 men each, then 3 or 4 rounds of deploying the remaining men before attacking. Going after continents would occur more quickly, and experienced CC players wouldn't be so surprised when playing at the IRTOC - International RISK Tournament Of Champions
Image
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by oVo »

Robinette wrote:maybe it [the drop] could be random territories with 2 men each, then 3 or 4 rounds of deploying the remaining men

This sounds like a good way to start a game or provide an excellent alternative option.
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Thezzaruz »

Robinette wrote:Going after continents would occur more quickly, and experienced CC players wouldn't be so surprised when playing at the IRTOC - International RISK Tournament Of Champions


Really??? That's just hilarious, you should really know the basic game mechanics before you enter a tourney... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Robinette »

Thezzaruz wrote:
Robinette wrote:Going after continents would occur more quickly, and experienced CC players wouldn't be so surprised when playing at the IRTOC - International RISK Tournament Of Champions


Really??? That's just hilarious, you should really know the basic game mechanics before you enter a tourney... :lol: :lol: :lol:



heheee.... you don't understand... CC players, after playing a thousand games or so, figure they have they strategy nailed... but that little tiny difference with the initial deployment TOTALLY changes the way the game develops... and CC players have no real experience with that...
Image
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Thezzaruz »

Well I can understand the lack of experience but no one shouldn't be surprised by the rule tbh.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Robinette »

Thezzaruz wrote:Well I can understand the lack of experience but no one shouldn't be surprised by the rule tbh.


*sigh* you're still not getting all of it...

nobody was surprised by the rule, just surprised by the difference in game play.
Image
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: Alternate Fortification

Post by Thezzaruz »

Robinette wrote:nobody was surprised by the rule, just surprised by the difference in game play.


Oh... :oops:
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”