CC 2000+ MAJOR'S GAMES!
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
there is some confusion about this because of the super elite title which we will change to colonel games when master chief gets the chance
the Super Elite Games is a totally seperate entity, created for the top players on the site.
What we are proposing is open games for all colonels which will include doubles games, triples games and 3 and 4 player games
we are proposing that once you hit 2000 you can join...but after that you can have a safe zone...
i dont want to make any of these decisions...id like to hear everyones input on it to be honest
the Super Elite Games is a totally seperate entity, created for the top players on the site.
What we are proposing is open games for all colonels which will include doubles games, triples games and 3 and 4 player games
we are proposing that once you hit 2000 you can join...but after that you can have a safe zone...
i dont want to make any of these decisions...id like to hear everyones input on it to be honest
- steve monkey
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 5:25 pm
- Location: London
games
I think it is a great idea. I would be interested in playing.
. I like the idea of a safe zone that AAfitz brought up also.
If you think you are too small to be effective, you have never been in the dark with a mosquito
im desperately hoping for tourney rights to be honest like the elite games....but we dont want to overload the system either if there isnt room for it....so if anyone has any ideas please post
if it has to stay in private games...my guess is that after we get used to seeing the names...we will know which is which because there will be mostly colonels in the games...try the password...if it works...your in...if not...move along...lol
if it has to stay in private games...my guess is that after we get used to seeing the names...we will know which is which because there will be mostly colonels in the games...try the password...if it works...your in...if not...move along...lol
- JOHNNYROCKET24
- Posts: 5514
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: among the leets
I think 2,000 is too low. 2,500 is more harder to achieve. what I mean by that is, once you cross 2,500, the points become alot harder to hold onto and they dont rack up as fast. When I was a general not so long ago, you would get like 5 points per win and 50 points per loss. 2,000 is too easy to master, lose, and remaster.
than, once you cross the 2,500 barrier, you become a life time member. too many players have obtained 2,000.
also, i was too lazy to read the entire thread. forgive me if im repeating someone else.
than, once you cross the 2,500 barrier, you become a life time member. too many players have obtained 2,000.
also, i was too lazy to read the entire thread. forgive me if im repeating someone else.
i do agree, and i dont expect as many high level colonels to join as mid to low colonels which is more the idea behind it
there are few enough players above 2500 that private games work fine
this makes it easy for colonels to join without as much of an extreme difference in score thats in elite...
and im sure several of the higher ranked colonels will join too, and no one joins as many games as you....you wont be able to resist...youll see
there are few enough players above 2500 that private games work fine
this makes it easy for colonels to join without as much of an extreme difference in score thats in elite...
and im sure several of the higher ranked colonels will join too, and no one joins as many games as you....you wont be able to resist...youll see
- Master Chief
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:46 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
I agree with Fitz. I think that although it is quite the milestone to reach 2500, few have attained it. (I know I haven't), and I think I'm pretty good.
That doesn't mean though that your idea should be shot down completely. Sure, we can humor the "lifetime membership" concept if other people want to try that, but as Fitz said, when ptlowe and I came up with this idea, it was geared more towards those who were tired of losing to the low end of the "elite" range but still Colonels, and therefore were looking for a challenging group to play against. I see your point though JR, and if we get THIS up and running, then maybe we can see about making a separate more elite group (maybe the 2.5 club?) or something like that. Thanx again for all your support, and I think that if ptlowe doesn't show his sorry butt in there soon, his name should be taken out of the credit behind the idea, and should be replaced by AAFitz. 
Highest place: 11th in 2006
Highest score: 2866 in 2011
Highest rank: Colonel in 2006
Highest score: 2866 in 2011
Highest rank: Colonel in 2006
- Master Chief
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:46 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Virginia
Yeah..... it is harder for some.
I made my climb to 11th, then got a horrible losing streak down to Lt., then climbed back up to 2301 just recently, and now I'm sitting here at around 2100. I guess that shows how much of a roller coaster this game can really be. It happens to all of us, even those that are considered 'good'.
Highest place: 11th in 2006
Highest score: 2866 in 2011
Highest rank: Colonel in 2006
Highest score: 2866 in 2011
Highest rank: Colonel in 2006
My 2000 points were very easy to come by...lack gave me 1000 to start and i only had to gain 1000 which was just 50 20 point wins
it was the 8000 points that i lost along the way that was annoying
and this isnt meant to replace open games at all
just give us a few games to play for fun
and credit is not due...i really just want the games to be there...will be a blast
it was the 8000 points that i lost along the way that was annoying
and this isnt meant to replace open games at all
just give us a few games to play for fun
and credit is not due...i really just want the games to be there...will be a blast
Sounds like a good idea... a nice middle ground between elite and super elite.
I'd certainly play in a few games, although i'm not so sure on the lifetime membership thing. If you drop below 2000 then join a few elite games until your score is back up there. If you're good enough it will get back up, and if you're not then you shouldn't be in these games!
I'd certainly play in a few games, although i'm not so sure on the lifetime membership thing. If you drop below 2000 then join a few elite games until your score is back up there. If you're good enough it will get back up, and if you're not then you shouldn't be in these games!
- Mike Doherty
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:23 am
- Location: somewhere...in the deep Canadian woods
- reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
- Contact:
Count me in
Count me in 
I will play.
I know that this is about qual games so peeps don't lose points playing newbs.
I ask all peeps who posted here to look back and see how they made the rank they are, majority will say dubs/trips with newbs.
The score system promotes this for gaining rank.
Look at yourself and say yes, I earned this, you don't believe it, I don't.
If I had given it another 7 weeks I would be top player here using the tactic I gave up before Xmas.
BB
I know that this is about qual games so peeps don't lose points playing newbs.
I ask all peeps who posted here to look back and see how they made the rank they are, majority will say dubs/trips with newbs.
The score system promotes this for gaining rank.
Look at yourself and say yes, I earned this, you don't believe it, I don't.
If I had given it another 7 weeks I would be top player here using the tactic I gave up before Xmas.
BB

Bogusbet wrote:I will play.
I know that this is about qual games so peeps don't lose points playing newbs.
I ask all peeps who posted here to look back and see how they made the rank they are, majority will say dubs/trips with newbs.
The score system promotes this for gaining rank.
Look at yourself and say yes, I earned this, you don't believe it, I don't.
If I had given it another 7 weeks I would be top player here using the tactic I gave up before Xmas.
BB
I have just looked at myself, and i believed it when i said it!

