Suspect101 wrote:For that I feel like putting you back at L-1, it will give us lots of information in my mind. unvote vote drench
What sort of info?
I would vote Suspect now, but that's L-1
pmchugh wrote:vote stroop cause he is scum again
Bit quick to label me there
I would vote pmc now, but that's L-1
The horrifying smallness of this game is taking all the fun out of voting
Exactly so we need to be careful, unlike suspect who put someone at L-1 in full knowledge of what he as doing. That puts him as a major suspect in my books (sorry couldn't resist).
unvote fos suspect till he explains his vote
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! 2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
Suspect101 wrote:For that I feel like putting you back at L-1, it will give us lots of information in my mind. unvote vote drench
What sort of info?
I would vote Suspect now, but that's L-1
pmchugh wrote:vote stroop cause he is scum again
Bit quick to label me there
I would vote pmc now, but that's L-1
The horrifying smallness of this game is taking all the fun out of voting
Exactly so we need to be careful, unlike suspect who put someone at L-1 in full knowledge of what he as doing. That puts him as a major suspect in my books (sorry couldn't resist).
unvote fos suspect till he explains his vote
to gain information from watching how people react. I think I got a lot. Not to sure I want to say to much about my analysis(I seem to die when I do), but if you look at the reactions of everyone playing, I think it was very interesting.
Two looming questions are:
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
Suspect101 wrote:For that I feel like putting you back at L-1, it will give us lots of information in my mind. unvote vote drench
What sort of info?
I would vote Suspect now, but that's L-1
pmchugh wrote:vote stroop cause he is scum again
Bit quick to label me there
I would vote pmc now, but that's L-1
The horrifying smallness of this game is taking all the fun out of voting
Exactly so we need to be careful, unlike suspect who put someone at L-1 in full knowledge of what he as doing. That puts him as a major suspect in my books (sorry couldn't resist).
unvote fos suspect till he explains his vote
to gain information from watching how people react. I think I got a lot. Not to sure I want to say to much about my analysis(I seem to die when I do), but if you look at the reactions of everyone playing, I think it was very interesting.
Two looming questions are:
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
I find this interesting if true, here are my thoughts on it.
Why would you want Xen or Stroop to hammer Drench? If they were scum they would not be stupid enough to hammer and then get vengefully killed, if they were town it woould be a silly and huge risk, there is very litle evidence pointing to him being scum.
As for Drench his vote may have been OMGUS but rightlfully so considering the nature of your vote. Just because someone just voted you doesn't mean you can't vote them back.
Xen was clearly acting like we were still in the random voting stage, although I don't see why with people going to L-1.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! 2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
1) Why the hell would I, when their is no proof pointing towards him being scum. Question is, why do you want him gone so badly.
2) It was a random vote, no real reason. I would think that was obvious.
Please say more, we'll all gain from hearing more about what you have to say. It makes no sense to keep information that could benefit everyone, if you do die from it. Then it shouldn't be to hard to figure out who the scum is from it.
One reason you might be that your so geared towards getting him out is that your working together, and you know nobody in his right mind will hammer him. Then once somebody convinces you that he's not scum, you will simply unvote and no body will suspect you two are working together. Just thinking out loud here.
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
you guys misinterpreted my questions.
The first one was non-rhetorical. I do not want drench dead, unless he is scum. The question was not "we had a lynch why did you not hammer" the question was also the answer.
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
you guys misinterpreted my questions.
The first one was non-rhetorical. I do not want drench dead, unless he is scum. The question was not "we had a lynch why did you not hammer" the question was also the answer.
Huh how was the question the answer?
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! 2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
you guys misinterpreted my questions.
The first one was non-rhetorical. I do not want drench dead, unless he is scum. The question was not "we had a lynch why did you not hammer" the question was also the answer.
If you were scum what would you do with someone at L-1 in a 5 player mafia game? Huh how was the question the answer?
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
you guys misinterpreted my questions.
The first one was non-rhetorical. I do not want drench dead, unless he is scum. The question was not "we had a lynch why did you not hammer" the question was also the answer.
Huh how was the question the answer?
If you were scum what would you do with someone at L-1 in a 5 player mafia game?
Why did no one hammer drench? Stroop and Xen both had the chance to yet they did not.
Why did Xen vote PMC (his only post), even when I put drench at L-1.
my vote is staying with drench for his OMGUS vote.
you guys misinterpreted my questions.
The first one was non-rhetorical. I do not want drench dead, unless he is scum. The question was not "we had a lynch why did you not hammer" the question was also the answer.
Huh how was the question the answer?
If you were scum what would you do with someone at L-1 in a 5 player mafia game?
Nothing.
Exactly lol. If you hammer without reason you get killed and then so does your partner because of the rules.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! 2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
Drench wrote:This is Vengeful. The person lynched chooses who dies.
only if said person is town.
But that defeats the purpose of your original question which is: what would scum do in that position? (presumign town is at L-1)
p.s Im going away tommorow night, to sunny Blackpool I will be back late Wednesday night. So obviously I wont be able to post in this game or any other for a few days.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! 2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
pmchugh wrote:unvote fos suspect till he explains his vote
to gain information from watching how people react. I think I got a lot. Not to sure I want to say to much about my analysis(I seem to die when I do), but if you look at the reactions of everyone playing, I think it was very interesting.
What did you get? You won't die for sharing your thoughts...
pmchugh wrote:unvote fos suspect till he explains his vote
to gain information from watching how people react. I think I got a lot. Not to sure I want to say to much about my analysis(I seem to die when I do), but if you look at the reactions of everyone playing, I think it was very interesting.
What did you get? You won't die for sharing your thoughts...
pmchugh wrote:unvote fos suspect till he explains his vote
to gain information from watching how people react. I think I got a lot. Not to sure I want to say to much about my analysis(I seem to die when I do), but if you look at the reactions of everyone playing, I think it was very interesting.
What did you get? You won't die for sharing your thoughts...
You sound like a stranger offering me candy...
unvote vote stroop
If you're truly town, anything you have should be shared with us. We can't realistically lynch you for anything you think you know from the whole Drench thing and we might actually get a good target to lynch out of it.
Drench wrote:Suspect, my suspicions of you have grown even further. You are refusing to part with information, and generally behaving really annoying. Consider it a dramatic gesture when I Confirm Vote: Suspect101
It is not like investigated and am not telling information.
Drench wrote:Suspect, my suspicions of you have grown even further. You are refusing to part with information, and generally behaving really annoying. Consider it a dramatic gesture when I Confirm Vote: Suspect101
It is not like investigated and am not telling information.
Again, if you are town, you have no reason to be withholding possible information from us.
vote Suspect. Next time it's in bold.
(FYI, I don't have a car (and I wouldn't give away delicious candy))
Suspect101 wrote:you should make it bold so we can see what happens. get me to L-1 and see if someone hammers.
I will put you at L-1 only if I intend to lynch you, not to see how everyone reacts.
With that in mind, vote Suspect.
You just want someone else to do your dirty work. If you feel that way, you should be the one to hammer. I am sure you can convince another person to take your L-1 place and you can be the hammer. I am sure you or Drench, since you both want me lynched, which means you both think I am scum, will be willing to be the last vote. Show your confidence. Un vote, convince someone else to jump on, and then you hammer.
I think everyone should agree with me on this. I think stroop or drench should un vote, and someone else should take the L-1 place, and then one of those two should be the hammer. They think I am scum, so they will defiantly not mind being the hammer.
Suspect101 wrote:you should make it bold so we can see what happens. get me to L-1 and see if someone hammers.
I will put you at L-1 only if I intend to lynch you, not to see how everyone reacts.
With that in mind, vote Suspect.
You just want someone else to do your dirty work. If you feel that way, you should be the one to hammer. I am sure you can convince another person to take your L-1 place and you can be the hammer. I am sure you or Drench, since you both want me lynched, which means you both think I am scum, will be willing to be the last vote. Show your confidence. Un vote, convince someone else to jump on, and then you hammer.
I think everyone should agree with me on this. I think stroop or drench should un vote, and someone else should take the L-1 place, and then one of those two should be the hammer. They think I am scum, so they will defiantly not mind being the hammer.
Yes, I would be willing to hammer you. I approve of anyone hammering you at this point.
I don't see why I should go through the hassle you propose just so I can take a different position in the majority that is needed to lynch you.