WWI Ottoman Empire [Quenched]

captainwalrus · Post by **captainwalrus** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:47 pm

Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:33 am

captainwalrus wrote:Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.

Wellno, they aren't necessary but could be an issue on Beirut and Cyprus, don't yo-u think.

WidowMakers · Post by **WidowMakers** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:00 am

cairnswk wrote:
captainwalrus wrote:Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.

Wellno, they aren't necessary but could be an issue on Beirut and Cyprus, don't yo-u think.

The new crowns look good cairns. They fit the color palette well. They blend in but are easily noticed as well. God job.

As far as army circles go I think it is ok. You could move the crown on Cyprus a bit tot eh left and move the 88 left as well. Plus you could make the island a bit bigger (I don't think this map is going for actual sized accurate geography.

You could also do the same for Beirut. Make the sea border move left and widen the country a bit. Maybe?

WM

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:52 am

WidowMakers wrote:
cairnswk wrote:
captainwalrus wrote:Are army circles realy neccesary? It seems that the center of the territories are light enough.

Wellno, they aren't necessary but could be an issue on Beirut and Cyprus, don't yo-u think.
The new crowns look good cairns. They fit the color palette well. They blend in but are easily noticed as well. God job.

As far as army circles go I think it is ok. You could move the crown on Cyprus a bit tot eh left and move the 88 left as well. Plus you could make the island a bit bigger (I don't think this map is going for actual sized accurate geography.

You could also do the same for Beirut. Make the sea border move left and widen the country a bit. Maybe?

WM

Done.

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/OTTOMAN%20EMPIRE/WW1_Ottoman_V17L.jpg[/bigimg]

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/OTTOMAN%20EMPIRE/WW1_Ottoman_V17LT.jpg[/bigimg]

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17S.jpg

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17L.jpg

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/_WWI_Ottoman_Empire.xml

oaktown · Post by **oaktown** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:17 pm

is it just me, or are the crowns way more bad-ass now? =D>

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:43 am

oaktown wrote:is it just me, or are the crowns way more bad-ass now?

Jut a touch of royalty there with a purple disc behind them...only thing i was happy with.

ZeakCytho · Post by **ZeakCytho** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:45 am

cairnswk wrote:
oaktown wrote:is it just me, or are the crowns way more bad-ass now?

Jut a touch of royalty there with a purple disc behind them...only thing i was happy with.

I like the new crowns.

Quench?

The Neon Peon · Post by **The Neon Peon** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:17 pm

Crowns look a lot better now.

Would you mind enlarging your signature? It is very hard to read at the moment.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:18 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Crowns look a lot better now.

Would you mind enlarging your signature? It is very hard to read at the moment.

Nah...i think it's OK as is..if you don't know that butterfly by now you never will.
EDIT: on 2nd thoughts, i redid the butterfly completely. Please refresh.

ZeakCytho · Post by **ZeakCytho** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:01 pm

That new butterfly is seriously badass 8-)

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:23 pm

ZeakCytho wrote:That new butterfly is seriously badass

and the colours fit the map and theme so well too....good work. =D>

gho · Post by **gho** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:03 am

Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but the colours of the italian colony and the hussain of mecca are too similar and since they are close to each other on the map, maybe a change is in order. Also the top left side of the arch (just right of the title) looks empty, maybe put your signature there? (or on the right, moving whatever that logo thats on the right currently to the left.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:53 pm

Done. Please refresh your screen.

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/OTTOMAN%20EMPIRE/WW1_Ottoman_V17L.jpg[/bigimg]

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17S.jpg

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17L.jpg

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/_WWI_Ottoman_Empire.xml[/quote]

The Neon Peon · Post by **The Neon Peon** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:34 pm

Italian Abyssina has the purple line that is at the edge of the territory near the red sea moved in slightly into the territory away from it's edge. Mostly visible on the large map, and only in a few places on the small one.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:51 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Italian Abyssina has the purple line that is at the edge of the territory near the red sea moved in slightly into the territory away from it's edge. Mostly visible on the large map, and only in a few places on the small one.

OK, i see that...are there any others you can see before i go posting an update.

the.killing.44 · Post by **the.killing.44** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:55 pm

[nitpick]
It's not the same thing, but Trabzon's coastal border seems to be somewhat erased, or just skinnier than the others.
It wouldn't hurt to have the middle one of the Nile's delta (the one shaped like a Y within the bigger Y) connect to the overall Y better.
I'd like to see you add the line from Beirut to the tert on the large map. Without it it's, well,

[/nitpick]

This is looking great, cairns!

.44

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:55 pm

cairnswk wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:Italian Abyssina has the purple line that is at the edge of the territory near the red sea moved in slightly into the territory away from it's edge. Mostly visible on the large map, and only in a few places on the small one.

OK, i see that...are there any others you can see before i go posting an update.

Done.

the.killing.44 wrote:[nitpick]
It's not the same thing, but Trabzon's coastal border seems to be somewhat erased, or just skinnier than the others.
It wouldn't hurt to have the middle one of the Nile's delta (the one shaped like a Y within the bigger Y) connect to the overall Y better.
I'd like to see you add the line from Beirut to the tert on the large map. Without it it's, well,
[/nitpick]

This is looking great, cairns!

.44

Done. Please refresh your browser

Version 17.

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/OTTOMAN%20EMPIRE/WW1_Ottoman_V17L.jpg[/bigimg]

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17S.jpg

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17L.jpg

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/_WWI_Ottoman_Empire.xml

The Neon Peon · Post by **The Neon Peon** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:04 pm

Woah... why is Europe worth 2? It is only 2 territories.

Secondly, Constantinople name needs to be moved closer to the territory, and the line connecting the name to the territory is missing on the large map.

Thirdly, Trabzon appears to be a different color from the rest of the continent, was this intentional?

Fourthly, there is a little tip of a black line showing in Adana (where the shoreline changes direction, the line to distinguish between the sea and land continues for a few pixels.

Fifthly, Kutais-Batum to Erzurum border has a little dark splotch.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:29 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Woah... why is Europe worth 2? It is only 2 territories.

Secondly, Constantinople name needs to be moved closer to the territory, and the line connecting the name to the territory is missing on the large map.

Thirdly, Trabzon appears to be a different color from the rest of the continent, was this intentional?

Fourthly, there is a little tip of a black line showing in Adana (where the shoreline changes direction, the line to distinguish between the sea and land continues for a few pixels.

Fifthly, Kutais-Batum to Erzurum border has a little dark splotch.

Got any more before i start making changes?

The Neon Peon · Post by **The Neon Peon** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:29 pm

Crimea and Terek. Those two definitely look different in terms of the text.

Beiruit has no dark green near the borders, not sure if they is for visibility, or a mistake.

The line that connects Alexandria to the territory extends a different amount on the small and large maps.

Yerevan name could be moved down a pixel or two.

Don't see anything else.

sailorseal · Post by **sailorseal** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:40 pm

I love the idea, I am a HUGE WWII fan and this map is great. It is also good looking and historically accurate.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:48 pm

sailorseal wrote:I love the idea, I am a HUGE WWII fan and this map is great. It is also good looking and historically accurate.

sailor...i don't mean to be rude...but i wouldn't want you in my army if you can't read....this is WW (1) One 1914 not WWII (two)...or did you just get it wrong.
Glad you like it though.

cairnswk · Post by **cairnswk** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:49 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Woah... why is Europe worth 2? It is only 2 territories.

Coz' it's got 3 borders and one of them is a one way from a large power....nobody seemed to mind that bonus.
Hussein of Mecca is 3 terts with two borders and it's got 2 also.

Secondly, Constantinople name needs to be moved closer to the territory, and the line connecting the name to the territory is missing on the large map.

Done.

Thirdly, Trabzon appears to be a different color from the rest of the continent, was this intentional?

no. it's the same colour, just doesn't have the middle creamish glow.

Fourthly, there is a little tip of a black line showing in Adana (where the shoreline changes direction, the line to distinguish between the sea and land continues for a few pixels.

Fixed.

Fifthly, Kutais-Batum to Erzurum border has a little dark splotch.

Fixed

The Neon Peon wrote:Crimea and Terek. Those two definitely look different in terms of the text.

Crimea needed bolding. Fixed.

Beiruit has no dark green near the borders, not sure if they is for visibility, or a mistake.

Fixed....length of inner glow

The line that connects Alexandria to the territory extends a different amount on the small and large maps.

Fixed.

Yerevan name could be moved down a pixel or two.

Fixed.

Don't see anything else.

Good. Thanks

Please refresh your browser...

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/OTTOMAN%20EMPIRE/WW1_Ottoman_V17LT.jpg[/bigimg]

[bigimg]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282/cairnswk/OTTOMAN%20EMPIRE/WW1_Ottoman_V17L.jpg[/bigimg]

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17S.jpg

http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s282 ... n_V17L.jpg

http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/_WWI_Ottoman_Empire.xml

oaktown · Post by **oaktown** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:36 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:Don't see anything else.

neither do I. =D>

sailorseal · Post by **sailorseal** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:47 pm

cairnswk wrote:
sailorseal wrote:I love the idea, I am a HUGE WWII fan and this map is great. It is also good looking and historically accurate.

sailor...i don't mean to be rude...but i wouldn't want you in my army if you can't read....this is WW (1) One 1914 not WWII (two)...or did you just get it wrong.
Glad you like it though.

Sorry late nights :shock:

WWI Ottoman Empire [Quenched]

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V15(p20)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V15(p20)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V15(p20)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V15(p20)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V17

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V17

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr,XML] - V16(p21)