Oasis [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Hawkeye Pierce
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:49 am

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by Hawkeye Pierce »

There is a loop in this map , wich makes it unfair to play. the hold the 1 turn grand oasis has the loop . wait untill 5 min till end of 24 h then take grand oasis after that 24h ends and login again and you won this map in 6min.
Hope you understand my msg grtz Hawkeye #-o #-o
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by yeti_c »

Hawkeye Pierce wrote:There is a loop in this map , wich makes it unfair to play. the hold the 1 turn grand oasis has the loop . wait untill 5 min till end of 24 h then take grand oasis after that 24h ends and login again and you won this map in 6min.
Hope you understand my msg grtz Hawkeye #-o #-o


Classic freestyle objective tactic - works the same for continents too.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Hawkeye Pierce
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:49 am

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by Hawkeye Pierce »

I see but continent doesn't win te game imediatly , this one does hold grand oasis for 1 round and you win. 1 round should be longer then 2 min I think . can't this be changed into hold till all players took their turn ? would be more ballanced . Like the map by the way
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by wcaclimbing »

Hawkeye Pierce wrote:I see but continent doesn't win te game imediatly , this one does hold grand oasis for 1 round and you win. 1 round should be longer then 2 min I think . can't this be changed into hold till all players took their turn ? would be more ballanced . Like the map by the way


that isn't possible with the XML tools we have, sorry.

Xanthir wrote:I'm playing the map right now, and we're enjoying it. However, the fact that deserts lose 1 troop per turn doesn't seem like it *does* anything, because it won't return to neutral if you leave it with a single troop. We can still strike out across the desert all we want, and maintain easy fortify chains across the area.

I suggest that if you have 1 troop on a desert when your turn comes around, it is destroyed and reverts to 1 neutral. If you want to be *truly* evil, have it revert to its original neutral army.

Same with grand oasis, obviously. If you have 3 troops or less in one of the squares, it returns to neutral. Even if you let deserts stay at 1 when they reset, grand oasis definitely should reset to 6 if it kills you.


I like it leaving 1s around the map, not neutrals. Without them, fortifying would be really annoying....
Image
User avatar
Hawkeye Pierce
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:49 am

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by Hawkeye Pierce »

NP , thnx for the answer .
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by OliverFA »

Hello!

Don't know if somebody already reported this, but I think that some of those territories are wrong: Desert 49 [-1] Desert 63 [-1] Desert 64 [-1] Desert 81 [-1]

I say this because in game http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?gam ... full_log=Y BOB is saying that blue will get 2 armies next turn, including -1 from Region Bonus.
Welcoming the long awaited Trench Warfare Setting (Previously Adjacent Attacks).

My Maps:
Research and Conquer - Civilization meets Conquer Club

Best score: 2,346 - Best position: #618 - Best percentile: 4.87%
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by OliverFA »

And the same mistake happens with desert 09
Welcoming the long awaited Trench Warfare Setting (Previously Adjacent Attacks).

My Maps:
Research and Conquer - Civilization meets Conquer Club

Best score: 2,346 - Best position: #618 - Best percentile: 4.87%
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by oaktown »

OliverFA wrote:Hello!

Don't know if somebody already reported this, but I think that some of those territories are wrong: Desert 49 [-1] Desert 63 [-1] Desert 64 [-1] Desert 81 [-1]

I say this because in game http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?gam ... full_log=Y BOB is saying that blue will get 2 armies next turn, including -1 from Region Bonus.

I'm not following you Oliver... perhaps the confusion stems from the fact that BOB doesn't distinguish between a desert territory with two armies that will take a loss, and one with one army that won't take a loss.
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by OliverFA »

Oh! Maybe that's the case and is a BOB thing. I will check more carefully and post here the final result (and if it's a BOB error, post also the error report inthe BOB thread).
Welcoming the long awaited Trench Warfare Setting (Previously Adjacent Attacks).

My Maps:
Research and Conquer - Civilization meets Conquer Club

Best score: 2,346 - Best position: #618 - Best percentile: 4.87%
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by wcaclimbing »

OliverFA wrote:Oh! Maybe that's the case and is a BOB thing. I will check more carefully and post here the final result (and if it's a BOB error, post also the error report inthe BOB thread).

it probably is a BOB error.
everything on the map works like it is supposed to, so I don't think its a map problem.
Image
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by yeti_c »

OliverFA wrote:Hello!

Don't know if somebody already reported this, but I think that some of those territories are wrong: Desert 49 [-1] Desert 63 [-1] Desert 64 [-1] Desert 81 [-1]

I say this because in game http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?gam ... full_log=Y BOB is saying that blue will get 2 armies next turn, including -1 from Region Bonus.


I think you'll find that it is 100% correct - but you are reading it wrong.

At the moment - BOB says - he is getting 3 for the next turn - yet has 2 territories with -1 - because he only has 1 army on these territories - then it knows that he doesn't lose any of them.

The Continents Display still lists them so that you know which territories will lose you armies...

You'll notice that when you get to the Grand Oasis - which has more than -1 - it even calculates the difference between the negative bonus to -1 and still gives the correct answer.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
Songsting
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:25 am

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by Songsting »

Just wanted to say that I've played a few games on your Oasis map, and I absolutely love it. The gameplay and map style is quite different to most other maps, and is a pleasure to play because of the change in tactics required. Well done on a fantastic effort, wcaclimbing!
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by OliverFA »

yeti_c wrote:At the moment - BOB says - he is getting 3 for the next turn - yet has 2 territories with -1 - because he only has 1 army on these territories - then it knows that he doesn't lose any of them.

The Continents Display still lists them so that you know which territories will lose you armies...

You'll notice that when you get to the Grand Oasis - which has more than -1 - it even calculates the difference between the negative bonus to -1 and still gives the correct answer.

C.


I am afraid that either there is a mistake in BOB, a strange case not contemplated yet, or I am very ofuscated with that subject. Look at these images:

Image

Image

As you can see, BOB is saying that I will get 8 armies (9-1) but I will get 9 armies. So it is counting 1 army wrong.

Of course, I have absolutely no interest in saying that BOB is not working. On the contrary, it is a really good script that I always use (in fact I use Internet Explorer for normal Internet browsing and Firefox for CC so I can use BOB) I am just trying to point a possible bug that can be solved to make BOB even better.

If I find a pattern in that strange behaviour (or I discover that I am getting crazy and seeing bugs where they aren't) I will inform you.
Welcoming the long awaited Trench Warfare Setting (Previously Adjacent Attacks).

My Maps:
Research and Conquer - Civilization meets Conquer Club

Best score: 2,346 - Best position: #618 - Best percentile: 4.87%
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by yeti_c »

You're about to lose an armie on Desert 9.

Hence 9-1 = 8.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
ZeakCytho
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:36 pm

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by ZeakCytho »

yeti_c wrote:You're about to lose an armie on Desert 9.

Hence 9-1 = 8.

C.


But he has 2 oasis, so +6, and 10 territories, so +3, for a total of 9 to deploy.
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by yeti_c »

ZeakCytho wrote:
yeti_c wrote:You're about to lose an armie on Desert 9.

Hence 9-1 = 8.

C.


But he has 2 oasis, so +6, and 10 territories, so +3, for a total of 9 to deploy.


It isn't the amount of Troops that you are about to deploy... It is the amount of Troops due that turn.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
ZeakCytho
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:36 pm

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by ZeakCytho »

yeti_c wrote:
ZeakCytho wrote:
yeti_c wrote:You're about to lose an armie on Desert 9.

Hence 9-1 = 8.

C.


But he has 2 oasis, so +6, and 10 territories, so +3, for a total of 9 to deploy.


It isn't the amount of Troops that you are about to deploy... It is the amount of Troops due that turn.

C.


Oh. Then the number is correct. But wouldn't the number of troops you get to deploy be a more useful number?
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: Oasis [Quenched]

Post by MrBenn »

Looks like conversation is wandering into BOB territory here... I'd suggest continuing BOB chat in yeti's thread, and leaving this one for the Oasis map ;-)
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
campkev
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:47 pm

Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by campkev »

Concise description:
  • Oasis game ending too soon. We were playing the Oasis game and it ended after a player held the Center Three Oasises (Oassii?) for only one turn.

Specifics:
  • Game Id: 3741889
  • First captured in Turn 9
  • Captured by someone else in Turn 10.
  • Game ended as soon as turn 12 started.
User avatar
The Neon Peon
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by The Neon Peon »

That is how the Oasis map works. You either eliminate your opponents, or hold the three grand oasii (same question on spelling).
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by wcaclimbing »

yep.
If you are holding all three parts of the Grand Oasis when you start your next turn, you win.
Thats exactly how its supposed to work, no bugs there.
Image
User avatar
pepperonibread
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: The Former Confederacy

Re: Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by pepperonibread »

Wikipedia says it's oases.
Image
campkev
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 7:47 pm

Re: Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by campkev »

It looks like I need to submit a bug report on my reading skills. I could have sworn it said that you had to hold it for three turns. But I looked at the rules again and I completely misread it. D@#%it. I could have won that game if I had read it right
Marshes
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:14 pm

Re: Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by Marshes »

Fwiw, even though you were originally confused about how to end the game. I do agree the game ends to quick, specially in freestyle.
The neutral armies should be beefed up in the middle imho or you should have to be able to hold them for 1 full round not 10seconds of one round.

Great map though.
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: Oasis game ending too soon.

Post by Thezzaruz »

Marshes wrote: I do agree the game ends to quick, specially in freestyle.


Victory conditions and the freestyle setting (especially in speed games) ain't a good match of formats. It's just something one needs to know.
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”