No. Let's try prevention rather than cure shall we?black elk speaks wrote:then don't read my posts if you don't like them.
How about this: Don't make your posts at all if they're not going to be of any use to the thread in question. Just because spam is long doesn't stop it from being spam.
What a load of bullshit, evidence plz.black elk speaks wrote:at night, when you lay in your bed wondering how it is that after your government has finished with you, your actual working wage is half of what they tell you it is because they have decided that they know better how to spend your money than you do, you always have to come back to... oh, yes, I am supposed to feel compassionate towards people because my government tells me so.
Another Straw-Man from BES... what a surprise.
Again, bullshit. Evidence pl0x.black elk speaks wrote:I will let them skim my paycheck to pay for the idiot masses, whom they keep dependent on said government with "dumbing down" educational programs and social handouts in the guise of a better society for all.
Hmm, an old cliche... weren't we talking about you relying on those too much only a few moments ago?black elk speaks wrote:If you want to help someone, don't give them a fish. Teach them how to fish and let them work ethically to feed themselves
Anyway, the reasons your argument falls down are because (1) liberals actually favour giving people fish while teaching him how to catch them themselves, y'know so they don't starve to death during the learning process, and (2) your world proposition involves neither giving fish to people, nor paying for them to learn how to catch them, instead you seem to favour throwing people into the river regardless of their health, then just forgetting about them and presuming that if they don't make it out ok then it must be their fault.
Enlightened? Forward thinking? Remotely logical? Well, perhaps if you live in the 14th century...
Wheeeee! We're back to the bullshit again.black elk speaks wrote:Your ideas about socialist capitalism are simply a conduit for ever left reaching social policy.
Go on, why not just accuse me of being a lizardman or something, take your rabid speculation and accusation hurling to the extreme. It's already silly, why not go the whole hog and make it ludicrous? After all you seem to love doing it several times in every post, why hold back?
What word am I about to say next? Here's a clue, it starts with B and ends with ullshit.black elk speaks wrote:First you mandate affirmative action, Then bail out corporate institutions. Then you give away health care. Food, clothing, housing... its soon to all be from the government.
Nobody here has said they agree with all three programs you specified, and furthermore they're spread between several different nations (meaning one government couldn't physically mandage them all).
Finally, 'giving away healthcare' is something of a misnomer, what with us believing that a right to a basic standard of health is something of a human right to which every man ought to be entitled regardless of his monetary situation. In other words, you saying 'giving away' in that context sounds about as ridiculous to us as if you were complaining that the government was just 'giving away oxygen' or 'giving away freedom'.
Poo originating from cattle.black elk speaks wrote:historically, this has not gone well.
Prove it. Remind me of the social policy direction of the majority of G8 nations?
Bull... oh you know where this is going.black elk speaks wrote:While the Government may seem like the right place for these kinds of things to be coming from, in truth, it is a wolf in sheep's clothing, mainly due to governments corrupt and inefficient nature.
Come on, prove all this rubbish you're foaming out.
Corrupt nature? Get out of your tinfoil already... how is government any more corrupt than private industry. For reference, see Wall Street, then go read about what 'Antitrust' is and why we have it.
Then may I kindly suggest that you remove the cotton wool from your ears?black elk speaks wrote:I think its you who doesn't know enough to make an effective contribution here, if for no other reason because I have yet to hear a reason other than compassion for the less fortunate.
Seriously, if you're not going to read other people's posts, or are unable to understand them, then what's the point of you even participating? Your foghorn approach to debating is barely going to change any minds.

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.