Indian Empire [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
reggie_mac
Posts: 299
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Queenstown, NZ
Contact:

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by reggie_mac »

i know it sounds picky, but..

On Bay of Bengal title, is it possible to distort/skew the B and A into the crease of the book cause it looks like its floating.
Or tell me to go F#$% myself :)
Soviet Invaders: Space Invaders, it's not just a game
New Zealand Map - Foundry
"You can please all of the people some of the time, or some of the people all of the time, but not all of the people all of the time"
User avatar
johloh
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by johloh »

alright oak...its been a really long time since I've been on here (too busy with my website) but I got a little nostalgic and came back to check out the maps. here are some opinions I have...

graphics
-maybe continue the coastline to the edge of the page? im not a huge fan of floating maps, I prefer to see them connected to the mainland.
-the green of the one continent is too sea green, id go more olive?
-the last red mountain between bhal and sindh looks odd, maybe continue the arc of the other mountains through sinh?
-curve malwa text the other way? like a smile instead of a frown?
-I'm not a big fan of the way the continents are labeled...im not sure if its the color or text or what, just dont like it. if possible some color in the key would make for quick reference. I had trouble reading the key and figuring out the continents, and my trouble not real trouble, it was just a bit awkward. color in the key would actually remove the need for them named on map, except the color blind people might complain...(seems like we have a lot of those? I wonder if there is a gene tied to colorblindness and fondness for board games)
-railroads seem kinda ugly, they dont match the artistic look of the rest of the map. I feel like they mar the clean look. maybe less rails (more spacing?) I dunno.
-is "and countries adjacent" necessary in the title?
-tips of blue mountains kinda have a brown speck on them?
-is it further india or farther india? key and continent label dont match

otherwise sweet graphics, I love the style. and the book background is great!

gameplay
-bonuses for continents seem balanced by size and borders.
-railroads are ok, but seem to me to only add mediocre interest. they are in the middle to 'increase gameplay in the middle' but I dont see them being held. the two mid ones seem to hard. the south one is easier, but wont increase play in the sea of yellow in the middle.
-seems to me itll be too concentrated on the sides.
-I think you need some more pizazz to gameplay somewhere. I get what youre going for with the railroads, it just doesnt seem to me like its quite pulling it off.

ha. look at my sig, it links to my old map in progress.
my new site - http://www.spritestitch.com/ - A video game craft weblog...
User avatar
Hatchman
Posts: 792
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:05 am
Gender: Male
Location: The charming village of Emery

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by Hatchman »

This map is truly breathtaking. =D>
User avatar
TaCktiX
Posts: 2392
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Rapid City, SD

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by TaCktiX »

So what are we waiting on? I think this map is Foundry-ready.
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by oaktown »

TaCktiX wrote:So what are we waiting on? I think this map is Foundry-ready.

Well, I haven't updated this map in a month, so there's no rush.
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by mibi »

This map is delicious but the yellow area seems real faint to me... especially in the Malwa and Rajpoo area. Also can you bring some color down to the legend, it would help deciphering the bonus regions.
User avatar
Sir. Ricco
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.
Contact:

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by Sir. Ricco »

mibi wrote:This map is delicious but the yellow area seems real faint to me... especially in the Malwa and Rajpoo area. Also can you bring some color down to the legend, it would help deciphering the bonus regions.

I really like this map. I like the color scheme you created. I like the yellow how it is too. Keep it up.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by MrBenn »

I'm going to do two things here...

Firstly, as it has been over a month since the last update, and following discussion with Oaktown, this map is being put onto vacation for a short while, and so will be moved into temporary retirement.

The second thing I'm going to do is to give this map a draft stamp, as the map is definitely Foundry-ready...

Image

This means that when Oak is ready to continue with the map, he can go straight into the Foundry proper.
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: British India - version 4, pg 3

Post by oaktown »

[bigimg]http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r76/ron_parodi/india05.jpg[/bigimg]

I'm back! There's nothing significantly different here about the gameplay... I had kind of walked away from this because I found the thought to drawing the railroads somewhat daunting. But widow's idea of scrunching text together along a path to make a line gave me the idea of packing "#" signs together to make railroads that can be manipulated. They aren't perfect yet, but they're a huge improvement over what I had!

Anyway, when last we say this map there was some discussion around the regions. Personally I like the idea of having the big Bengal Presidency region - no, it won't be held much during a game, but neither is (Asia) in that map we all used to play.

I need to do a lot of work on some elements to make this map easier to play - I can see that now. Throw your thoughts at me!
User avatar
Balsiefen
Posts: 2299
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: The Ford of the Aldar in the East of the Kingdom of Lindissi
Contact:

Re: British India - I'm back! page 4

Post by Balsiefen »

Nice one with the railways Oak.
Just a couple of quick things I picked up.

-You'll need to do some hand editing still on the railways where they join. At the moment they look a bit strange.
-I assume connecting cities via rail means holding every territory the railway goes through. That may need to be better worded as at the moment as I can see confusion with people who think they only need to hold the cities.
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: British India - I'm back! page 4

Post by MrBenn »

Balsiefen wrote:Nice one with the railways Oak.
Just a couple of quick things I picked up.

-You'll need to do some hand editing still on the railways where they join. At the moment they look a bit strange.
-I assume connecting cities via rail means holding every territory the railway goes through. That may need to be better worded as at the moment as I can see confusion with people who think they only need to hold the cities.


I recently discovered you can add a layer mask to a text layer, so you should be able to use that to to tidy up the joins without rasterising...
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: British India - I'm back! page 4

Post by oaktown »

MrBenn wrote:
Balsiefen wrote:Nice one with the railways Oak.
Just a couple of quick things I picked up.

-You'll need to do some hand editing still on the railways where they join. At the moment they look a bit strange.
-I assume connecting cities via rail means holding every territory the railway goes through. That may need to be better worded as at the moment as I can see confusion with people who think they only need to hold the cities.


I recently discovered you can add a layer mask to a text layer, so you should be able to use that to to tidy up the joins without rasterising...

I could do that, or I could smooth out the curves enough that they don't break. I fixed a lot of gaps before I posted this, but it was clear that there were more than I wanted to tackle at the moment.

And Balseifen is right with the wording - perhaps something simple like "hold all rail territories to connect two cities" - except I think we're moving away from the word "territory." Would "provinces" be appropriate on an old India map?
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: British India - I'm back! page 4

Post by cairnswk »

oaktown
if you're using PS3, there is railway line brush available at
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/i ... id=1044414
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: British India - I'm back! page 4

Post by oaktown »

cairnswk wrote:if you're using PS3, there is railway line brush available...

Shit, yeah, that's a lot easier.

[bigimg]http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r76/ron_parodi/india06.jpg[/bigimg]
Made some stuff easier to follow, moved things around, added some images, and changed the territory layout around Calcutta - the old system made no sense.
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: British India - page 5

Post by cairnswk »

oaktown, i imagine that link was a great help.
can i offer that the text in between tert names and region names is looking quite cluttered
since you already have the regions in the legend, is there any need for them to be on the map if you colour them in the legend.
This would surely remove a lot of clutter with names crossing one another in many instances.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: British India - page 5

Post by oaktown »

cairnswk wrote:oaktown, i imagine that link was a great help.
can i offer that the text in between tert names and region names is looking quite cluttered
since you already have the regions in the legend, is there any need for them to be on the map if you colour them in the legend.
This would surely remove a lot of clutter with names crossing one another in many instances.

yep, there's a lot going on. I was thinking I'd either find some kind of alternative for the region names, or rework it using a mini-map in the bottom left corner. It's a work in progress.

Gameplay thoughts, anyone?
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: British India - page 5

Post by cairnswk »

oaktown wrote:...
Gameplay thoughts, anyone?

Since the Andaman Islands are part of the Indian Union and featured in the British occupation of India, perhaps a sea route from either Calcutta or Madras to the Andamans? Would that be relevant?
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: Indian Subcontinent - version 4, pg 3

Post by MrBenn »

MrBenn wrote:1. I just wanted to clarify the railway bonus - do you need just the start and end points, or do you need all the territories along the route?
2. The Calcutta-Delhi route increases the total for Bombay Presidency to +11 for 11 terrs... That has some sort of epic appeal ;-)
3. The Bay of Bengal and the rivers going through Bengal are very distracting... it took me a while to work out which area Bengal was... the position of the terr name helps a bit, but is still confusing...
4. The crease of the book feels a little bit too pink... is it possible to change the colour balance of the book layer to make it slightly browner?
5. the mountains could do with a little bit more variation - they look good, but I can see the recurring 'M' shape too easily
6. You mentioned the railway graphic - I've worked out why it looks out of place; there should be two tracks between the sleepers {=|=|=|=} instead of {-|-|-|-|-}
7. Have I mentioned that I like it? Keep up the good work ;-)

1. The legend could still be interpreted either way
3. This is a million times clearer now - issue resolved.
4. I still think the crease would be better being brownie-orange rather than pink... and the the glow around the region names should be paper-coloured (ie where the text goes over the crease, the glow should be the same colour...)
7. Can I say it again?

My biggest concern at the moment is #1 above, as it has a big impact ;-)
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: British India - page 5

Post by oaktown »

[bigimg]http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r76/ron_parodi/india07.jpg[/bigimg]

Tweaks in this update...
• Region names in the legend now stroked the color of the region.
• Region names on the map are now lighter, and they are the bottom layer. I still like them being there for colorblind help, and I hope that by hiding them a bit they don't interfere with other elements.
• Played with some mountains to reduce the number of "M" mountains.
• Rail description changed... any better?
• Made Bengal a +7, from +8... MrBenn pointed out that with the rail bonus its +11, which may be a bit too "epic."
• All territories have army counts, just for purposes of getting everything in the right place... since there will be no army circles, I hope.

cairnswk wrote:Since the Andaman Islands are part of the Indian Union and featured in the British occupation of India, perhaps a sea route from either Calcutta or Madras to the Andamans? Would that be relevant?

Question: would a sea link from the Andaman Islands to either Calcutta or Madras (Coromandel Coast territory) be beneficial to play? It would make the Farther India region singificantly harder to hold, but add connectivity across the map. Going to Madras would certainly open the map up more, but add a border territory to the Madras region as well. Hmm?
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: British India - map and question, page 5

Post by InkL0sed »

No, to your question. Those continents have plenty of borders as it is.
User avatar
Kaplowitz
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: British India - map and question, page 5

Post by Kaplowitz »

Oak, you REALLY need to post a tutorial on how you made those mountains..... =P~

also: i can barely tell apart those 2 orange/yellow continents.
Image
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: British India - map and question, page 5

Post by gimil »

In my humble opinion oaktown, Bengal and Madras are far to similarly coloured. It took a good close look for me to realise they were two different continents. On the map as well central and farthar india look very similar as well. I had a hard time differentiating these continents from their bonuses.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: British India - map and question, page 5

Post by iancanton »

just to let u know that i'll be stamping the gameplay on this map.

farther india looks distinctly magenta in the legend but violet on the map iteslf. unrelated to gameplay, below is a link to a map published by john bartholomew of edinburgh where farther india refers to what is today known as indochina plus the malay peninsula.

http://www.davidrumsey.com/maps5279.html

another one, showing farther india as upper and lower burmah plus indochina.

http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet ... r-India,-C

since farther india consistently includes indochina, i suggest burmah as the continent name.

for the title of the map, i like indian empire: british raj or something similar, so that it fits alphabetically in the gamefinder list. british east indies includes singapore, british malaya and british sumatra, which are not part of our subject matter.

ian. :)
User avatar
captainwalrus
Posts: 1018
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Finnmark

Re: British India - map and question, page 5

Post by captainwalrus »

The graphics are the pretty similar to the Eastern Hemisphere map and the War of Tripple Alliance maps (not so much the second one). I like them but if all three get Quenched your going to have to make them pore different.
User avatar
captainwalrus
Posts: 1018
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Finnmark

Re: British India - map and question, page 5

Post by captainwalrus »

Also. The bonus fot the bombay-calcatta line shoucld be 3 not 4.
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”