Ditocoaf wrote:This thread was intended to be an ethics debate.
Apparently, life has no intrinsic value in/of itself. Makes sense, given how they all seem to be in love with the disgusting notion of hive-minded Marxism.
Unless your also admitting to baiting?
Also, its a lot easier to claim "babies should be killed" isn't real, than "I'm offended" isn't real. You have to admit its a lot more likely that you would get offended (happens quite often, no reason to assume it wouldn't happen again) than we would kill babies casually (I'm pretty sure it's never been discussed casually, seriously).
You obviously have never read A Modest Proposal.
A very early example indeed of trolling, though with ulterior motives.
Ditocoaf wrote:This thread was intended to be an ethics debate.
Apparently, life has no intrinsic value in/of itself. Makes sense, given how they all seem to be in love with the disgusting notion of hive-minded Marxism.
Unless your also admitting to baiting?
Also, its a lot easier to claim "babies should be killed" isn't real, than "I'm offended" isn't real. You have to admit its a lot more likely that you would get offended (happens quite often, no reason to assume it wouldn't happen again) than we would kill babies casually (I'm pretty sure it's never been discussed casually, seriously).
You obviously have never read A Modest Proposal.
A very early example indeed of trolling, though with ulterior motives.
I don't seem to recall that being written in a very casual tone, though...
Ditocoaf wrote:This thread was intended to be an ethics debate.
Apparently, life has no intrinsic value in/of itself. Makes sense, given how they all seem to be in love with the disgusting notion of hive-minded Marxism.
Unless your also admitting to baiting?
Also, its a lot easier to claim "babies should be killed" isn't real, than "I'm offended" isn't real. You have to admit its a lot more likely that you would get offended (happens quite often, no reason to assume it wouldn't happen again) than we would kill babies casually (I'm pretty sure it's never been discussed casually, seriously).
You obviously have never read A Modest Proposal.
A very early example indeed of trolling, though with ulterior motives.
I don't seem to recall that being written in a very casual tone, though...
It was written in an extremely casual tone. That was the satire of it all, that he was suggesting the butchering, cooking, and eating of babies in a completely calm manner.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
Actually Jenos, the purpose of that thread was to bait so somebody would be baited into baiting them by pretending to take it seriously and then they'd bust you.
*And the purpose of this post is to bait you into saying that you knew they were baiting you by baiting you so you would pretend to take it seriously and then bait them with that and they knew that and you'll say you knew that was the purpose and my bait will have succeeded, after which time you will say you baited me into saying my post succeeded, but I am baiting you into saying that you baited me by saying my post succeeded and then you will say etc, etc, etc.
You got baited and you shallowed it good. Admit it and get a life. I love it how you try to change your story. You say you were baiting them, but first you said you don't think dead babies are funny in any context and were mad at them for joking about it. Oh, yeah, you were still baiting them when you said that. And you baited me into posting this too, right?
Simon Viavant wrote:You got baited and you shallowed it good. Admit it and get a life. I love it how you try to change your story. You say you were baiting them, but first you said you don't think dead babies are funny in any context and were mad at them for joking about it. Oh, yeah, you were still baiting them when you said that. And you baited me into posting this too, right?
It turns every argument you've ever had to your side. If you're right you're right, if you're wrong you didn't actually mean that. He'd make a great politician.
What is amazing is how pompass every one here is, how high they esteem themsleves. I could dig into my thesaurus deeper, but I'll simply say that I've managed to bait you not only here, but I baited you with by parting shot in the original thread.
Helps if you read the fine print.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark
"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
Jenos Ridan wrote:What is amazing is how pompass every one here is, how high they esteem themsleves. I could dig into my thesaurus deeper, but I'll simply say that I've managed to bait you not only here, but I baited you with by parting shot in the original thread.
Helps if you read the fine print.
Pompous. That's all. Actually, one other thing, everyone's pompous. For instance, do you consider any of your opinions to be incorrect? No?! Wow, guess you're just perfect, eh?
Simon Viavant wrote:You got baited and you shallowed it good. Admit it and get a life. I love it how you try to change your story. You say you were baiting them, but first you said you don't think dead babies are funny in any context and were mad at them for joking about it. Oh, yeah, you were still baiting them when you said that. And you baited me into posting this too, right?
It turns every argument you've ever had to your side. If you're right you're right, if you're wrong you didn't actually mean that. He'd make a great politician.
Ha! you're not gonna get me to respond to nonsense like that.
Thor, you and Jenos are connected somehow, and at least one of you is a multi. Neither of you plays games, except for a perfunctory few, which you both lose. I will think about it, but first I am going to ask around about you.
And you baited me into posting this too, right? 
