[Abandoned] - Winter

Abandoned and Vacationed maps. The final resting place, unless you recycle.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
bspride
Posts: 416
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:18 am
Location: Big Spring, Texas

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by bspride »

maybe you could have remnants of an old campground somewhere...kinda like the people left in a hurry or were killed, leaving there stuff thrown around...
User avatar
Mr. Squirrel
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:18 pm
Location: up a tree

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by Mr. Squirrel »

ZeakCytho wrote:How about a fishery? Or fishing hut, if you want to keep it more medieval/fantasy.

Why a graveyard?

A graveyard can be a very useful resource center. With this being a cold climate, all the meat will be well preserved. :shock: :? =P~
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

Mr. Squirrel wrote:
ZeakCytho wrote:How about a fishery? Or fishing hut, if you want to keep it more medieval/fantasy.

Why a graveyard?

A graveyard can be a very useful resource center. With this being a cold climate, all the meat will be well preserved. :shock: :? =P~


:lol:


about bspride's suggestion, maybe just a destroyed building or area, nothing specific. So we could leave it to the players imagination to decide what resources they might be gaining from controlling a destroyed building.
Image
whitestazn88
Posts: 3128
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: behind you
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by whitestazn88 »

that looks incredbile
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by MrBenn »

This does look like a work of art ;-)

I'd like to see an ice-sheet expanding into the sea a little bit, so you've got a transistion from snow-covered land to partly-frozen sea.

Have you thought about a 'wilderness' in the corner - snow-covered fir trees... maybe even a lamp-post a la Narnia or something?
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

MrBenn wrote:This does look like a work of art ;-)

I'd like to see an ice-sheet expanding into the sea a little bit, so you've got a transistion from snow-covered land to partly-frozen sea.

Have you thought about a 'wilderness' in the corner - snow-covered fir trees... maybe even a lamp-post a la Narnia or something?


I'm not too sure about the ice sheet, because I just don't think it would come out looking right. I like how the rivers and ocean look now, I don't want to mess it up by adding ice to it.

I'm going to try making some trees, but its a completely new thing for me to attempt.
If it comes out looking good, then I will put some trees, and then maybe a timber camp and log mill to go with it.
Image
bspride
Posts: 416
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:18 am
Location: Big Spring, Texas

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by bspride »

what about some dog sled tracks or something...
bryguy
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by bryguy »

Looking good :) some things tho...

1) I really like how you did the building next to the lighthouse, could you do all the buildings like that?
2) Are you gonna add mountains or anything?
3) If your gonna have bonuses for iron mine gold mine etc, then you should space them out, and they would look better in my opinion if they were in the side of a mountain....
4) Could you lower the opacity of the shadow of the bridges? they seem a little to dark in my opinion
5) How about some ice in parts of the water? that would add an interesting way to get across
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

bryguy wrote:Looking good :) some things tho...

1) I really like how you did the building next to the lighthouse, could you do all the buildings like that? Yeah, but it would require creating every house by hand, to get the lighting right. I might do it, its not too much work.
2) Are you gonna add mountains or anything? Maybe, just around the edges, like up around the mines. If I can figure out how to make good graphics for it.
3) If your gonna have bonuses for iron mine gold mine etc, then you should space them out, and they would look better in my opinion if they were in the side of a mountain.... If i can make the mountains, I will put the mines in the mountains. Or next to them, or something.
4) Could you lower the opacity of the shadow of the bridges? they seem a little to dark in my opinion I can do that.
5) How about some ice in parts of the water? that would add an interesting way to get across I'm not a big fan of that idea. But you are the second person to request some kind of ice on the water, so maybe.
Image
User avatar
The Viking
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:58 am

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by The Viking »

bspride wrote:maybe you could have remnants of an old campground somewhere...kinda like the people left in a hurry or were killed, leaving there stuff thrown around...

This reminds me of the Dyatlov Pass Incident.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyatlov_Pass_Accident
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by gimil »

[revoked]
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

gimil wrote:[adv. idea]


interesting....
It's going to be sticking here for quite a long time, I think.
Lots of stuff left for me to create, and I haven't even considered territory borders yet.

EDIT: scroll down to my next post. I put a bigger response in it.
Last edited by wcaclimbing on Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
edbeard
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by edbeard »

I guess I'm going to be a sourpuss. I know that wca is about to get Oasis quenched so he's obviously a guy who's sticking around. Buuuuuut, he doesn't have any territories or continents. I'm not trying to comment on how you're doing your job (volunteer) and you do a great job at it and we're all appreciative of your time but we've had plenty of maps with territories continents and many updates that don't get the adv idea. This map realistically has had zero updates. showing glimpses of your map and then showing the first blank version without territories is not an update let alone the few that you're supposed to have.


apologies to wca for putting it here but it's where it's happening.
bryguy
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by bryguy »

wcaclimbing wrote:
bryguy wrote:5) How about some ice in parts of the water? that would add an interesting way to get across I'm not a big fan of that idea. But you are the second person to request some kind of ice on the water, so maybe.


Id be content with even a couple of chunks of ice out by the boats :)
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

edbeard wrote:I guess I'm going to be a sourpuss. I know that wca is about to get Oasis quenched so he's obviously a guy who's sticking around. Buuuuuut, he doesn't have any territories or continents. I'm not trying to comment on how you're doing your job (volunteer) and you do a great job at it and we're all appreciative of your time but we've had plenty of maps with territories continents and many updates that don't get the adv idea. This map realistically has had zero updates. showing glimpses of your map and then showing the first blank version without territories is not an update let alone the few that you're supposed to have.


apologies to wca for putting it here but it's where it's happening.


No need to appologise, edbeard. Its ok.
I actually agree with you, I don't think this map is anywhere near [adv idea] stage yet. I would have said close to the same things you said about the lack of updates and the other more complete maps, I just didn't bother to write it out yet. I was thinking of talking to gimil first instead of saying something right in this thread.

I was quite surprised this got [adv idea]. Because it is still so early on in production and it will still be in ideas for a very long time.
I wouldn't have given this map [adv idea] if it was my job to lick it, but I just accepted what I got until I could PM gimil about it.

It seems like a bit of a mistake to sticky this so early, when there are many other maps in this forum that are much farther ahead in development. Maybe he meant to give the [adv idea] to a different map, just got mixed up and put here instead. This map is no where near anything other than the extremely early development stage. I'll PM gimil and talk to him about it, to see what he thinks. I don't think I want this thread stickied this early... its definitely not ready yet.
Image
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by gimil »

:oops:

I stamped the wrong thread.

I meant to stamp antartica :-^

Let me just revoke that [adv. idea] #-o
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
benny profane
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by benny profane »

I have no doubt that this map is going to be great.
But attention to gameplay (territories/bonuses) is definitely necessary.
If you're still trying to come up with enough resources, I think a smoke house makes a lot more sense than a graveyard.
You don't bury people in snow.
If anything these folks would probably be giving each other Viking funerals.
Unless this isn't a yearlong winter we're talking about.
rustlemania
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: here... and there.

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by rustlemania »

I think you should consider adding ruins off in the distance (maybe one of the far corners). it could add a bit of mystery to the map, and i'm certain you could make them beautiful. I was think some sort of stone ruins, and as for a resource behind it? maybe the locals have given it some sort of spiritual significance they find essential to life?
i don't know, just an idea, but i feel that it would fit beautifully into your map/graphics style.
Image
User avatar
The Viking
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:58 am

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by The Viking »

benny profane wrote:I have no doubt that this map is going to be great.
But attention to gameplay (territories/bonuses) is definitely necessary.
If you're still trying to come up with enough resources, I think a smoke house makes a lot more sense than a graveyard.
You don't bury people in snow.
If anything these folks would probably be giving each other Viking funerals.
Unless this isn't a yearlong winter we're talking about.

I agree. A graveyard in a terrain like the one in this map is just ridiculous.
And a settlement in this kind of terrain would very likely have a smoke house.
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ (formerly "Glacier") Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

ok, no graveyard.
But yes to smokehouse and maybe to ruins, if I can make the graphics work for them.
Image
User avatar
t-o-m
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:22 pm

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by t-o-m »

lookin good wca
User avatar
mibi
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by mibi »

the housese kinda look like envelopes.
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by MrBenn »

Have you had any thoughts about how this map is going to play? I'd like to see a version with tentative regions (even if the graphics behind it aren't complete) so that we can at least get some productive gameplay chat going on.
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by wcaclimbing »

mibi wrote:the housese kinda look like envelopes.

I'll probably be redrawing them all to have correct shadows. Maybe not in the next update, but it'll be done eventually.

MrBenn wrote:Have you had any thoughts about how this map is going to play? I'd like to see a version with tentative regions (even if the graphics behind it aren't complete) so that we can at least get some productive gameplay chat going on.

I'll make that my next update. Or, at least part of it.
Image
kingpin01
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:47 pm

Re: ∴∵∴Winter∴∵∴ Update pg. 1 + 6

Post by kingpin01 »

if the area outside the village is neutral, they will have to have a small number of neutral armies on each territory (1-2), or else there will be no incentive to waste armies on going for a bonus. Why would I go across the snow instead of just attacking the people around me?
High score 09/20/08
227 kingpin01 2502 601 214 (36%)
Post Reply

Return to “Recycling Box”