WWI Ottoman Empire [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by Qwert »

Wcaclimbing you dont tell me that you also can give Idea Stamp.


Anadolu(Asia minor, comprising most of modern Turkey)-----------------------Adrianople
Gelibolu--------Gallipoli
Dayr az Zog-----Deir ez Zor
Konya-antep-----Konya
Kutais-Batum----Kutaisi
AKbah-----------Sinai
Izmir-----------Smyrna

Now these names is most apropriated for map.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by cairnswk »

qwert wrote:Wcaclimbing you dont tell me that you also can give Idea Stamp.


Anadolu(Asia minor, comprising most of modern Turkey)-----------------------Adrianople
Gelibolu--------Gallipoli
Dayr az Zog-----Deir ez Zor
Konya-antep-----Konya
Kutais-Batum----Kutaisi
AKbah-----------Sinai
Izmir-----------Smyrna

Now these names is most apropriated for map.


OK qwert...to be fair....after this current poll in run, we'll have another poll and let the foundry commenters decide what goes on the map. I'd prefer the original english names, but others might have another choice. :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by Qwert »

OK qwert...to be fair....after this current poll in run, we'll have another poll and let the foundry commenters decide what goes on the map. I'd prefer the original english names, but others might have another choice.

Strange decision,every body know for Gallipoli(these is one example) and you want to add gelibolu(turkish name).
Anadolu is name for Asia Minor-all turkey and you put in place where is Adrianople(Edirne in turkey)
Sinai Peninsula is proper name for Akbah.
Well i just want to help to be proper, its up to you.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by cairnswk »

qwert wrote:
OK qwert...to be fair....after this current poll in run, we'll have another poll and let the foundry commenters decide what goes on the map. I'd prefer the original english names, but others might have another choice.

Strange decision,every body know for Gallipoli(these is one example) and you want to add gelibolu(turkish name).
Anadolu is name for Asia Minor-all turkey and you put in place where is Adrianople(Edirne in turkey)
Sinai Peninsula is proper name for Akbah.
Well i just want to help to be proper, its up to you.

exactly qwert, and that is why i make this decision to have poll. because sometimes what i see is not right, sometimes what others like you see is not right and sometimes we all not right. :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by Juan_Bottom »

I'm American, and I would prefer it to be in the Turkish language. It's a map of their country after all.
User avatar
lt_oddball
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Fortress Europe

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by lt_oddball »

Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm American, and I would prefer it to be in the Turkish language. It's a map of their country after all.


so the chinese maps should be in chinese character? The Mongol map in mongol text ?
And in worldmaps should have each individual country have its national spelling?
And what about contested areas ? The ottoman empire though appearing united in reality was and always had been a conglomerate of small groups of nationalities (as in Tito's Yugoslavia, as in Today's China, as in Former Soviet Union, as in etc..etc..)..
But what do you know, you're American. :mrgreen:
Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intellegor ulli.
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by Qwert »

exactly qwert, and that is why i make this decision to have poll. because sometimes what i see is not right, sometimes what others like you see is not right and sometimes we all not right.

Poll is ok,but first you must check if these all names present these place on map ;)
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by yeti_c »

cairnswk wrote:
qwert wrote:
OK qwert...to be fair....after this current poll in run, we'll have another poll and let the foundry commenters decide what goes on the map. I'd prefer the original english names, but others might have another choice.

Strange decision,every body know for Gallipoli(these is one example) and you want to add gelibolu(turkish name).
Anadolu is name for Asia Minor-all turkey and you put in place where is Adrianople(Edirne in turkey)
Sinai Peninsula is proper name for Akbah.
Well i just want to help to be proper, its up to you.

exactly qwert, and that is why i make this decision to have poll. because sometimes what i see is not right, sometimes what others like you see is not right and sometimes we all not right. :)


If you speak to qwert too much you start typing like him!?!

C.

PS - I voted dome top... hope inset water is gonna be cool like other water too.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by Juan_Bottom »

lt_oddball wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm American, and I would prefer it to be in the Turkish language. It's a map of their country after all.


so the chinese maps should be in chinese character? The Mongol map in mongol text ?
And in worldmaps should have each individual country have its national spelling?
And what about contested areas ? The ottoman empire though appearing united in reality was and always had been a conglomerate of small groups of nationalities (as in Tito's Yugoslavia, as in Today's China, as in Former Soviet Union, as in etc..etc..)..
But what do you know, you're American. :mrgreen:


Why shouldn't they be? Put English underneath or something.
User avatar
lt_oddball
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Fortress Europe

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] Poll (P1 or P8) for top of inset

Post by lt_oddball »

Juan_Bottom wrote:
lt_oddball wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm American, and I would prefer it to be in the Turkish language. It's a map of their country after all.


so the chinese maps should be in chinese character? The Mongol map in mongol text ?
And in worldmaps should have each individual country have its national spelling?
And what about contested areas ? The ottoman empire though appearing united in reality was and always had been a conglomerate of small groups of nationalities (as in Tito's Yugoslavia, as in Today's China, as in Former Soviet Union, as in etc..etc..)..
But what do you know, you're American. :mrgreen:


Why shouldn't they be? Put English underneath or something.


Then let's hope no-one decides to make the Thailand map:
The real name of Bangkok is Krungthep Mahanakon Bovorn Rattanakosin Mahintharayutthaya Mahadilokpop Noparatratchatathani Burirom Udomratchanivetmahasatan Amornpiman Avatarnsatit Sakkathattiyaavisnukarmprasit.
And the english translation would be something like:
The city of angels, the great city, the residence of the Emerald Buddha, the impregnable city of God Indra, the grand capital of the world endowed with nine precious gems, the happy city, abounding in an enormous Royal Palace that resembles the heavenly abode where reigns the reincarnated god, a city given by Indra and built by Vishnukarn.

Better stick to english or internationally accepted names :-^
Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intellegor ulli.
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE

Post by cairnswk »

And the winner is......

Option A - for the top of the inset -> Ottoman Dome
Image
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by gimil »

POLL - TOP OF INSET (changeble voting)

Poll ended at Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:39 am

Option A: Ottoman Dome top
9
52%

Option B: Slanted top as per map
8
47%


Total votes : 17
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
edbeard
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by edbeard »

I guess I'm the only one who feels that the Armenia colour on the legend and the map don't really match? (Looks darker on the legend to me)
User avatar
Ruben Cassar
Posts: 2160
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:04 am
Gender: Male
Location: Civitas Invicta, Melita, Evropa

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by Ruben Cassar »

Hey cairns...this map looks great, but why did you use the inset? Couldn't you have fitted the army circles in the main map? A mini map could be used to fill that extra space.

I also have some big problems to distinguish the colours. Aleppo and Adana regions look a bit similar and the pink British territories are hard to see. Perhaps a darker red would do the trick. I'm sorry to bring this up because the colour scheme is really nice but a bit confusing for my colour blind eyes. :(
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by cairnswk »

Ruben Cassar wrote:Hey cairns...this map looks great, but why did you use the inset? Couldn't you have fitted the army circles in the main map? A mini map could be used to fill that extra space.

The army circles fitted, but the one-way arrow didn't and it was very cramped compared to the rest of the map.

I also have some big problems to distinguish the colours. Aleppo and Adana regions look a bit similar and the pink British territories are hard to see. Perhaps a darker red would do the trick. I'm sorry to bring this up because the colour scheme is really nice but a bit confusing for my colour blind eyes. :(

Yes i'm pleased you've happened along for that CB issue. I'll change those colours a bit to suit if i can.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
oaktown
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by oaktown »

if the british campaign in mesopotamia really began in 916, that was indeed a long campaign! ;)

I'm throwing this out there both for you and other mapmakers: as a color blind player I appreciate it when the borders between regions differ from the territory borders in some manner other than color. On this map, every territory has an inner glow rather than every region as in some maps, which gets my eyes going in circles trying to sort out what's what. And in some cases the borders between territories of like color seem to be darker than between territories of different regions.

And am I the only one concerned about this trend of new maps with legends that are as large as the playing area?
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by yeti_c »

Cairns your Legend mixes tenses/ownerships...

For the Allies you have
Great Britain
Italy
France
and
Russian Empire
Mussien of Mecca

Consider using the collective terms i.e.
British
French
Italian

Especially as these areas aren't "France" - they are "French" however.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by cairnswk »

yeti_c wrote:Cairns your Legend mixes tenses/ownerships...

For the Allies you have
Great Britain
Italy
France
and
Russian Empire
Mussien of Mecca

Consider using the collective terms i.e.
British
French
Italian

Especially as these areas aren't "France" - they are "French" however.

C.

kewl...good points. thanks
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by cairnswk »

oaktown wrote:...
And am I the only one concerned about this trend of new maps with legends that are as large as the playing area?

well this will not remain in this form and if i can trim it down i will...however there is nothing written in stone, concrete or any other medium in this site that says the design has to be as you described above and are concerned about. :)
as long as the map stays with bounds of the size regulations..... ;)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by cairnswk »

Any more comments?
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by gimil »

cairnswk wrote:as long as the map stays with bounds of the size regulations..... ;)


And community satisfaction :-^

I sort of agree that the legends takes up to much needless space, but its not really a big issues to me to be honest.
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by cairnswk »

gimil wrote:
cairnswk wrote:as long as the map stays with bounds of the size regulations..... ;)


And community satisfaction :-^

I sort of agree that the legends takes up to much needless space, but its not really a big issues to me to be honest.


cairnswk wrote:...
well this will not remain in this form and if i can trim it down i will...


I wish people would read and understand!
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
gimil
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by gimil »

cairnswk wrote:I wish people would read and understand!


Come on cairns, we're not all perfect. Sometimes we don't have time to read everything you know ;)
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by Qwert »

by gimil on Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:09 pm


Come on cairns, we're not all perfect. Sometimes we don't have time to read everything you know

Come and say these on mine topic. ;)
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V8 P10

Post by MrBenn »

cairnswk wrote:
Ruben Cassar wrote:Hey cairns...this map looks great, but why did you use the inset? Couldn't you have fitted the army circles in the main map? A mini map could be used to fill that extra space.

The army circles fitted, but the one-way arrow didn't and it was very cramped compared to the rest of the map.
oaktown wrote:And am I the only one concerned about this trend of new maps with legends that are as large as the playing area?

It does seem a bit pointless to squeeze the inset area in, when there is plenty of room to spread things out...
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”