[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null Logic dictates that there is a God! - Page 168 - Conquer Club
I knew that's what it was... but the spelling I was really shakey. I did send it to Packrat, and everytime we argue creationism VS Evolution, I bring it up. Alls he ever does is shake his head. And It's time he gets called out on it.
Thank you very much for sharing it again though!!!!!
Juan_Bottom wrote:How about you prove me wrong in your own words Jay? Not to be mean, ok.... But I don't think you can do it.
Where to begin?
Carbon 14 dating? This is not an accurate way of dating. The process requires measuring the carbon in said item. In order to correctly carbon date, using half-life, you must know what the carbon content was to begin with. Eventually time runs out, and the carbon dating process is no longer effective. (It is only effective for a few thousand years) So much for dino fossils being 23,000,000 years old.
What you call facts are hardly that. There are very few "facts" when it comes to evolution.
I believe we have come full circle, what is this the 2,000th circle. Maybe we can carbon date it!
We don't use carbon dating for dino fossils. We use isotopes with longer half-lives. Carbon dating is great for human bones though.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Juan_Bottom wrote:How about you prove me wrong in your own words Jay? Not to be mean, ok.... But I don't think you can do it.
Where to begin?
Carbon 14 dating? This is not an accurate way of dating. The process requires measuring the carbon in said item. In order to correctly carbon date, using half-life, you must know what the carbon content was to begin with. Eventually time runs out, and the carbon dating process is no longer effective. (It is only effective for a few thousand years) So much for dino fossils being 23,000,000 years old.
What you call facts are hardly that. There are very few "facts" when it comes to evolution.
Jay, what about the forms of radio dating that we use on fossils and rocks? Carbon-14 is a gimmick.
I believe we have come full circle, what is this the 2,000th circle. Maybe we can carbon date it!
Juan_Bottom wrote:How about you prove me wrong in your own words Jay? Not to be mean, ok.... But I don't think you can do it.
Where to begin?
Carbon 14 dating? This is not an accurate way of dating. The process requires measuring the carbon in said item. In order to correctly carbon date, using half-life, you must know what the carbon content was to begin with. Eventually time runs out, and the carbon dating process is no longer effective. (It is only effective for a few thousand years) So much for dino fossils being 23,000,000 years old.
What you call facts are hardly that. There are very few "facts" when it comes to evolution.
Jay, what about the forms of radio dating that we use on fossils and rocks? Carbon-14 is a gimmick.
I believe we have come full circle, what is this the 2,000th circle. Maybe we can carbon date it!
"Radio-carbon dating is a method of obtaining age estimates on organic materials. It has been used to date samples as old as 50,000 years." And I'm not even buying that.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Jay (and any other creationists who like this argument) You claim that carbon-dating is faulty. Let's forget for the moment that carbon-dating is not as bg an issue as you imagine. Explain to me how you thin it works - your last coupla posts seemed a bit shakey on this subject. Before you can dismiss it, you need to convince us you understand it.
Juan_Bottom wrote:How about you prove me wrong in your own words Jay? Not to be mean, ok.... But I don't think you can do it.
Where to begin?
Carbon 14 dating? This is not an accurate way of dating. The process requires measuring the carbon in said item. In order to correctly carbon date, using half-life, you must know what the carbon content was to begin with. Eventually time runs out, and the carbon dating process is no longer effective. (It is only effective for a few thousand years) So much for dino fossils being 23,000,000 years old.
What you call facts are hardly that. There are very few "facts" when it comes to evolution.
I believe we have come full circle, what is this the 2,000th circle. Maybe we can carbon date it!
We don't use carbon dating for dino fossils. We use isotopes with longer half-lives. Carbon dating is great for human bones though.
To some ppl your asking "when did eternity start" u see some things can't be explained and plz let's just leave it at that
Oh and guns dont kill people, people kill people
When the first Atom bomb test was complete a colleague of Oppenheimer said: "What an Awesome and Foul display of Power." a moment later he added, "Now we are all sons of bitches"
Juan_Bottom wrote:How about you prove me wrong in your own words Jay? Not to be mean, ok.... But I don't think you can do it.
Where to begin?
Carbon 14 dating? This is not an accurate way of dating. The process requires measuring the carbon in said item. In order to correctly carbon date, using half-life, you must know what the carbon content was to begin with. Eventually time runs out, and the carbon dating process is no longer effective. (It is only effective for a few thousand years) So much for dino fossils being 23,000,000 years old.
What you call facts are hardly that. There are very few "facts" when it comes to evolution.
I believe we have come full circle, what is this the 2,000th circle. Maybe we can carbon date it!
We don't use carbon dating for dino fossils. We use isotopes with longer half-lives. Carbon dating is great for human bones though.
We don't really. I don't have access to the actual article, but I imagine that someone at Nature would have noticed a statistical anomaly, and AiG is notorious for bending the truth. All scientists are trained in the basics, if not more in-depth, of statistics. An error of the magnitude Williams is suggesting should be caught be even a second or third year student, so I imagine the PhDs were on the ball. Even assuming a statistical error, I would wager that even the younger crystals are significantly older than anything the bible predicts.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
mpjh wrote:Neoteny, did you seek divine intervention, and was there a specific request for a preference for leather.
Or
Did you use eharmony?
It was an ecology lab. I stole her partner's seat. We went to Starbucks where I rambled for a good hour or so. I suppose that fits into the first category. The leather was just luck.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
mpjh wrote:Well, there doesn't seem to be much risk of that. Seems you take pleasure in the simplest of things.
"All that you need is in your soul."
Honestly, these kinds of things hone my intelligence on a much broader spectrum of things I wouldn't otherwise know about. I try to look on the bright side.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
GrimReaper. wrote:To some ppl your asking "when did eternity start" u see some things can't be explained and plz let's just leave it at that
Oh and guns dont kill people, people kill people
My arguement stands
When the first Atom bomb test was complete a colleague of Oppenheimer said: "What an Awesome and Foul display of Power." a moment later he added, "Now we are all sons of bitches"