Explaination for Scott-land

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Scott-Land
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by Scott-Land »

hulmey wrote:
InsomniaRed wrote:
wrestler1ump wrote:scott,

You are not a strong enough player to win this game. The fact that you did not play properly does not entitle you to call somebody a "dipshit". I have notified the moderators of you offense and will press for a forum ban for you.


Scott is a great player, just because you two have issues does not mean you can blatantly deny his skill. Everyone gets irritated when people play without regard to what seems like the correct strategy for the game at the time. People should never take it too seriously, I used to at first, but then I learned I really was making stupid plays, and I should learn from these guys instead of fight them every time I do something idiotic. People need to get over their ego sometimes and admit that sometimes they make the wrong choices, like the OP should've. I don't think Scott was in the wrong to be mad at this.

abit like u throwing the game for Scott recently. Ive a good mind to report u to the cheating admins



Humley- you fucking dipshit. I said my brain was lagging......
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by hulmey »

Scott-Land wrote:
hulmey wrote:
InsomniaRed wrote:
wrestler1ump wrote:scott,

You are not a strong enough player to win this game. The fact that you did not play properly does not entitle you to call somebody a "dipshit". I have notified the moderators of you offense and will press for a forum ban for you.


Scott is a great player, just because you two have issues does not mean you can blatantly deny his skill. Everyone gets irritated when people play without regard to what seems like the correct strategy for the game at the time. People should never take it too seriously, I used to at first, but then I learned I really was making stupid plays, and I should learn from these guys instead of fight them every time I do something idiotic. People need to get over their ego sometimes and admit that sometimes they make the wrong choices, like the OP should've. I don't think Scott was in the wrong to be mad at this.

abit like u throwing the game for Scott recently. Ive a good mind to report u to the cheating admins



Humley- you fucking dipshit. I said my brain was lagging......


I also asked you to attack Indonesia so i could get a card and you said ok! Then you didnt so u could block me and not allow me to get a card!!! Thats low
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Scott-Land
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by Scott-Land »

Yeah- I know, I was going to but I went for the kill and missed Fble. It wasn't intentional - I just ran short on time, you autoed my 15 instead of the 7 in India..... ffs you fucking dipshit.
FabledIntegral
Posts: 1085
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: Highest Rank: 7 Highest Score: 3810
Contact:

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by FabledIntegral »

He made it clear several times he thought his brain was lagging.

Scott got fucking piss lucky that game. Should have ran him over for a kill but hesitated and tried to go around... cost me the game.
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by joecoolfrog »

hulmey wrote:Its called Risk....Scot has a history of being a loud mouthed bad loser. Not that i care coz freestyle is for losers anyway!


Clearly if you had taken any interest in this thread,as opposed to simply using it to bash Scott, then you would have known it was NOT a freestyle game that the OP was talking about ......TWAT !
Last edited by joecoolfrog on Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
FabledIntegral
Posts: 1085
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm
Location: Highest Rank: 7 Highest Score: 3810
Contact:

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by FabledIntegral »

hulmey wrote:Its called Risk....Scot has a history of being a loud mouthed bad loser. Not that i care coz freestyle is for losers anyway!


I hate foul mouthed people... they should learn that everyone has their own strategy and it's independent! I mean hey, just because someone autoes you and makes it so virtually neither of you can win the game anymore... doesn't mean their strategy is any less viable! Who cares if they hit you, it's their strategy, isn't it?
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by joecoolfrog »

ABSOLUTE_MASTER wrote:I don't like it when Scott calls me "dipshit".. that's why I have him on ignore... and I don't join his games....


Now seriously... aren't you getting too much attention? every 2 months or so I get to see one of this "Scott-was-mean-to-me" threads...


And I thought it was the other way around and we had you on ignore for cheating :lol:
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by joecoolfrog »

wrestler1ump wrote:I thought I made a thread about how high ranked players have bad personalities and big egos. This thread just proves my point!



No you are wrong,Lord Ha Ha had every right to start this thread and I fail to see what it has to do with ego :D
User avatar
Scott-Land
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by Scott-Land »

joecoolfrog wrote:
wrestler1ump wrote:I thought I made a thread about how high ranked players have bad personalities and big egos. This thread just proves my point!



No you are wrong,Lord Ha Ha had every right to start this thread and I fail to see what it has to do with ego :D



Speaking of which where is Hahaa and my apology? I'd respect players more if they've owned up to their mistakes......


EDIT: Since I'm in such a good mood that's asking too much- a simple, 'it wasn't the best play, Scott' will do and-' I was wrong to question you in the first place although DIPSHIT is a bit harsh...perhaps just call me a tool if it happens again in the future '
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by hulmey »

FabledIntegral wrote:
hulmey wrote:Its called Risk....Scot has a history of being a loud mouthed bad loser. Not that i care coz freestyle is for losers anyway!


I hate foul mouthed people... they should learn that everyone has their own strategy and it's independent! I mean hey, just because someone autoes you and makes it so virtually neither of you can win the game anymore... doesn't mean their strategy is any less viable! Who cares if they hit you, it's their strategy, isn't it?


you must hate joe and scott then coz they are foul mouthed. Furthermore, scot is the first person to question's someone's stragey if it effects him! THis is after all a game of Risk and we all know how kind the dice can be sometimes!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Scott-Land
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by Scott-Land »

hulmey wrote:
FabledIntegral wrote:
hulmey wrote:Its called Risk....Scot has a history of being a loud mouthed bad loser. Not that i care coz freestyle is for losers anyway!


I hate foul mouthed people... they should learn that everyone has their own strategy and it's independent! I mean hey, just because someone autoes you and makes it so virtually neither of you can win the game anymore... doesn't mean their strategy is any less viable! Who cares if they hit you, it's their strategy, isn't it?


you must hate joe and scott then coz they are foul mouthed. Furthermore, scot is the first person to question's someone's stragey if it effects him! THis is after all a game of Risk and we all know how kind the dice can be sometimes!




You're as dumb as a box of rocks- Hulmey. Ever heard of sarcasm?
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by joecoolfrog »

hulmey wrote:
FabledIntegral wrote:
hulmey wrote:Its called Risk....Scot has a history of being a loud mouthed bad loser. Not that i care coz freestyle is for losers anyway!


I hate foul mouthed people... they should learn that everyone has their own strategy and it's independent! I mean hey, just because someone autoes you and makes it so virtually neither of you can win the game anymore... doesn't mean their strategy is any less viable! Who cares if they hit you, it's their strategy, isn't it?


you must hate joe and scott then coz they are foul mouthed. Furthermore, scot is the first person to question's someone's stragey if it effects him! THis is after all a game of Risk and we all know how kind the dice can be sometimes!


Twat seems to me to be descriptive rather than simply foul, we might now add cowardly and evasive and get an even more accurate picture of you :lol:
PS Hulmey has shown his incredible debating powers by resorting to an abusive message on my wall - what a shining example he is of a mature intelligent human being #-o
Last edited by joecoolfrog on Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by hulmey »

Scott-Land wrote:
hulmey wrote:
FabledIntegral wrote:
hulmey wrote:Its called Risk....Scot has a history of being a loud mouthed bad loser. Not that i care coz freestyle is for losers anyway!


I hate foul mouthed people... they should learn that everyone has their own strategy and it's independent! I mean hey, just because someone autoes you and makes it so virtually neither of you can win the game anymore... doesn't mean their strategy is any less viable! Who cares if they hit you, it's their strategy, isn't it?


you must hate joe and scott then coz they are foul mouthed. Furthermore, scot is the first person to question's someone's stragey if it effects him! THis is after all a game of Risk and we all know how kind the dice can be sometimes!




You're as dumb as a box of rocks- Hulmey. Ever heard of sarcasm?


Ive heard of it, just simply choosing to ignore it. I know they are all your butt buddies. Abit of Throwing games for one another, bit of butt hole licking etc..... Oh and joe, stop trying to act hard with all your cussing and bad language on the internet coz u come across like a little boy.
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Seulessliathan
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:52 am

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by Seulessliathan »

wow, already 5 pages in less than 2 days ....for me it looks like everybody has his opinion and won´t change it ..... so why do you discuss here and don´t bash each other in another game? Seems to be more fun 8-) (apologies if you already do, i don´t check all the games^^)
User avatar
lordhaha
Posts: 507
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:18 am
Gender: Male
Location: Munster

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by lordhaha »

1. As I said earlier this was never meant to be "flame wars"

2. Scott-land and I obviously disagree on strategy (I believe in fighting to the end)

3. It was not the "dipshit" comment that bothered me it was an experienced player throwing his toys from the pram so to speak.

4. To all those that Pm'ed me to say I made a good play, I say thanks, I understand why you did not post here even though some of you have.

5. The only way either Scott-land or I will resolve this is, over a period of time we will see who averages out the best in Sequential.
Note. Even with clickable etc maps my lag time is about 3 seconds at best so am unable to compete at the freestyle.

6. I will apologize to Scott-land that my tactics don't suit his style of play but I am playing for myself after all and my attack was never personal.

7. Have a nice day and look forward to killing you all on the battle field. ;)
Image
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by joecoolfrog »

Hee Hee
Hulmey is still sending me PMs with lots of adolescent abuse, anybody know how old he is ?
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by hulmey »

joecoolfrog wrote:Hee Hee
Hulmey is still sending me PMs with lots of adolescent abuse, anybody know how old he is ?


who sent the first email? you did joe, now go see your thread in the flame wars. keep on chugging ;)
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by joecoolfrog »

Flame wars - oh yes im sure little hulmey likes it in there because he gets to act tough and say rude words like a big boy...........Oh to be 12 again :D
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by hulmey »

joecoolfrog wrote:Flame wars - oh yes im sure little hulmey likes it in there because he gets to act tough and say rude words like a big boy...........Oh to be 12 again :D


u been calling me moron, twat and so on, when i havent even been talking to you or about you. Now kindly stop posting and trying to derail this lovely thread!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Scott-Land
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by Scott-Land »

lordhaha wrote:1. As I said earlier this was never meant to be "flame wars"

2. Scott-land and I obviously disagree on strategy (I believe in fighting to the end)

3. It was not the "dipshit" comment that bothered me it was an experienced player throwing his toys from the pram so to speak.

4. To all those that Pm'ed me to say I made a good play, I say thanks, I understand why you did not post here even though some of you have.

5. The only way either Scott-land or I will resolve this is, over a period of time we will see who averages out the best in Sequential.
Note. Even with clickable etc maps my lag time is about 3 seconds at best so am unable to compete at the freestyle.

6. I will apologize to Scott-land that my tactics don't suit his style of play but I am playing for myself after all and my attack was never personal.

7. Have a nice day and look forward to killing you all on the battle field. ;)



I couldn't go on after reading #2- figures to be a good starting point. You started this blessed thread- don't back out and say we disagree. Let's talk about your strategy, the one that differs from mine. Do you think it was successful?

I've pointed out the flaws in your play... please enlighten me and give your thought process. Why haven't you quoted me on my explanation of what the correct play was? Don't think for a second you can keep up with me-- laughable at best, haha
khazalid
Posts: 3413
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:39 am
Location: scotland

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by khazalid »

This post was made by Scott-Land who is currently on your ignore list.

Display this post. (?)




hmmm... think i'll pass on that one.

so without actually reading anything in this thread im going to guess it went like this:

[author] made a move that lando disliked.
lando took a hissy fit and started squealing like a hog in mid-orgasm.
lando, still in fits of sniffles and inconsolable, sets about wreaking revenge by telling everyone stupid enough to take him seriously that [author] is a risk terrorist; heedlessly proud of his explosive collateral. (omg u suicided me) (?)

did it really warrant 5 pages of replies? fucking losers the lot of you.
had i been wise, i would have seen that her simplicity cost her a fortune
User avatar
comic boy
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by comic boy »

I believe that Hulmey just turned 15 but I can understand why Joe would think him a great deal younger.... curse of trailer park education again :cry:
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
JBoy
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:53 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by JBoy »

something must be wrong with me, but i sure do enjoy reading this every day..this is more fun than my games.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Highs # 7--4007--7-18-09 ....
User avatar
JBoy
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:53 pm

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by JBoy »

how about a 6 player, lordhaha,scott-land, joecoolfrog,khalazid,hunley,comic boy, winner gets last word ...i would enjoy watching that one.. =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
Highs # 7--4007--7-18-09 ....
User avatar
jiminski
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Gender: Female
Location: London

Re: Explaination for Scott-land

Post by jiminski »

JBoy wrote:how about a 6 player, lordhaha,scott-land, joecoolfrog,khalazid,hunley,comic boy, winner gets last word ...i would enjoy watching that one.. =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>



you are all wrong!!


make it an 8 man...
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”