TOP 20 MAP RANKS

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:08 pm

Others I found... - although they're not all upto the 20 limit- Draknor is pretty good though.

Draknor - Level 1 Corporal 1st Class 27pts for Sergeant +273 Won 13 from 16(81%) Won 1 from 1 53
San Francisco Private 1st Class 57pts for Corporal 1st Class +143 Won 4 from 5(80%) Won 0 from 1 11
Waterloo Sergeant 1st Class 175pts for Lieutenant +425 Won 68 from 90(76%) Won 14 from 19 227
Canada Private 1st Class 56pts for Corporal 1st Class +144 Won 6 from 8(75%) Won 3 from 3 14
8 Thoughts Private 1st Class 96pts for Sergeant +204 Won 5 from 7(71%) Won 3 from 3 15
Africa Private 1st Class 19pts for Corporal 1st Class +181 Won 4 from 6(67%) Won 2 from 3 13
Age Of Merchants Sergeant 99pts for Sergeant 1st Class +301 Won 14 from 23(61%) Won 5 from 7 33

And a couple of notable exceptions...

CCU New Recruit 42pts for Corporal 1st Class +158 Won 3 from 4(75%) Won 0 from 0 10
Malta New Recruit 59pts for Corporal +41 Won 1 from 1(100%) Won 1 from 1 4

C.

poo-maker · Post by **poo-maker** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:14 pm

I thought that we were finding game settings with high percentages, not just maps.

Warsteiners new score--- Won 216 from 230(94%) A Tie!!!

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:15 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:who has the best records or winning percentages of any map on CC

C.

firth4eva · Post by **firth4eva** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:16 pm

I started 13 Ireland games to get it up to an even hundred.

poo-maker · Post by **poo-maker** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:16 pm

yeti_c wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:who has the best records or winning percentages of any map on CC

C.

i know, my bad... i just figured that if it was going to be top 5's, it would be good to have all major settings.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:18 pm

poo-maker wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:who has the best records or winning percentages of any map on CC

C.

i know, my bad... i just figured that if it was going to be top 5's, it would be good to have all major settings.

Winning across a variety of settings has got to be better?

(Then again - I don't know what the settings are for my maps)

C.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:23 pm

the top 5 you have is kinda pointless.

i mean sure having a 95% win on 1v1 games in Bamboo is great but i'd rather have a 50% win on 8p games

Kemmler · Post by **Kemmler** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 pm

K this is 1v1 games basically... and I have the best record for Cairns

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:46 pm

DiM wrote:the top 5 you have is kinda pointless.

i mean sure having a 95% win on 1v1 games in Bamboo is great but i'd rather have a 50% win on 8p games

I think most would agree with you DiM

however, not all players play singles 6 to 8 players always, in fact, I think the minority do, this could be a separate component as another suggestion.

As far as right now, this is any map with 20 games or more, highest winning %

so, if you like singles 6 to 8 player games and want to play a ton on many maps, kool, but lets say you do not want to play singles 6 to 8 players on AOR's Magic, you rather play 3 player singles, or 1 on 1, or doubles, and do really well with this, it should be recognized is all i am saying. This does not necessarily mean they are a better player, but what it does show is they are very skilled in a particular map is all.

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:48 pm

poo-maker wrote:I thought that we were finding game settings with high percentages, not just maps.

Warsteiners new score--- Won 216 from 230(94%) A Tie!!!

did he lose another on bamboo you mean?

BENJIKAT IS DEAD · Post by **BENJIKAT IS DEAD** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:50 pm

So for the purposes of these calculations I am penalised for playing standard games on my favourite map!!

Waterloo:
Overall: 476 from 561 (85%)
standard/assassin/terminator: 5 from 18
1v1: 404 from 466 (87%)
team - all 3 types: 67 from 77 (87%)

pls note that almost all of the above are sequential too (freestyle = 6 from 8 )

I also think that 20 is WAY too low a number to qualify with - 100 seems better to me

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:52 pm

robinette luvs singles on classic and will always play many 6 players singles on that

but she could be on this list if she or anyone decided to play 1 on 1 games on a different map, or team games, etc, anyone could have a chance to make the list, they could start with a map they never played, then go to the next one, and keep trying.

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:54 pm

BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:So for the purposes of these calculations I am penalised for playing standard games on my favourite map!!

Waterloo:
Overall: 476 from 561 (85%)
standard/assassin/terminator: 5 from 18
1v1: 404 from 466 (87%)
team - all 3 types: 67 from 77 (87%)

pls note that almost all of the above are sequential too (freestyle = 6 from 8 )

I also think that 20 is WAY too low a number to qualify with - 100 seems better to me

this is why I like some suggestions, ty for the feedback. I will consider this if many agree, for now just starting with 20, maybe 100, maybe 30, or 50? could find happy medium, just collecting info. now, not implementing anything. Just listening to what all have to say, but good suggestion sir.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:02 pm

90-12 King of the Mountain
17-0 Conquerman
13-0 Duck and Cover
21-2 Extreme Global Warning
14-1 Rail USA

I got almost 9,500 games to go through. Not worth my time. I got a bunch of 1 vs 1's I never lost on but other games brought the % down.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:05 pm

Disagree on the over 20 thing... Mainly cos I've not played that many games!!!!

C.

White Moose · Post by **White Moose** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:20 pm

I have to agree.. 20 games is really few.. rather make it 100 as benjikat said, or at least 50.

20 is like nothing really..

Anyway, i guess i should post my best.. not that it's that much to brag about really, lol

Age of Realms: Might (1)
Won 272 from 409(67%)

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:22 pm

White Moose wrote:I have to agree.. 20 games is really few.. rather make it 100 as benjikat said, or at least 50.

20 is like nothing really..

Anyway, i guess i should post my best.. not that it's that much to brag about really, lol

Age of Realms: Might (1)
Won 272 from 409(67%)

That's a third of your games?!?!

C.

White Moose · Post by **White Moose** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:40 pm

yeti_c wrote:
White Moose wrote:I have to agree.. 20 games is really few.. rather make it 100 as benjikat said, or at least 50.

20 is like nothing really..

Anyway, i guess i should post my best.. not that it's that much to brag about really, lol

Age of Realms: Might (1)
Won 272 from 409(67%)

That's a third of your games?!?!

C.

Yeah, played the map A LOT before. Almost only in 1v1's.

Now i don't do it that often.. only like for some tournament where i still got the map as my home map. Kinda bored with it now though..

But now i've dropped down to lieutenant 3 times, and without playing the map im back up at major again, up and down

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:43 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:90-12 King of the Mountain
17-0 Conquerman
13-0 Duck and Cover
21-2 Extreme Global Warning
14-1 Rail USA

I got almost 9,500 games to go through. Not worth my time. I got a bunch of 1 vs 1's I never lost on but other games brought the % down.

helps to have %'s sir

just do one map at a time jr

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:44 pm

yeti_c wrote:Disagree on the over 20 thing... Mainly cos I've not played that many games!!!!

C.

benjikat thinks it should be more and now yeti thinks it should be less, lol, i can't win :lol:

for now it stays at 20 games played on one map, this is very realistic and something to shoot for over time

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:45 pm

White Moose wrote:I have to agree.. 20 games is really few.. rather make it 100 as benjikat said, or at least 50.

20 is like nothing really..

Anyway, i guess i should post my best.. not that it's that much to brag about really, lol

Age of Realms: Might (1)
Won 272 from 409(67%)

wow, thats good on that map

White Moose · Post by **White Moose** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:46 pm

Another thing why it should be more than 20 times.

I can find beginners who set up freestyles on maps i haven't played on yet, or like won 2 out of 2.
Then win 20 times, and have 100% win..
way to easy.

White Moose · Post by **White Moose** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:46 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
White Moose wrote:I have to agree.. 20 games is really few.. rather make it 100 as benjikat said, or at least 50.

20 is like nothing really..

Anyway, i guess i should post my best.. not that it's that much to brag about really, lol

Age of Realms: Might (1)
Won 272 from 409(67%)

wow, thats good on that map

Thanks

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:47 pm

White Moose wrote:Another thing why it should be more than 20 times.

I can find beginners who set up freestyles on maps i haven't played on yet, or like won 2 out of 2.
Then win 20 times, and have 100% win..
way to easy.

I doubt a noob could go 20-0 unless they a multi or an old player on here with new account, i dont care if it is 1 on 1 freestyle or not, highly unlikely

Shatners Bassoon · Post by **Shatners Bassoon** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:56 pm

111 from 193 on Waterloo(58%)....probably about 55% 1v1,the rest mixed games styles and number of players.

TOP 20 MAP RANKS

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK

Re: MAP RANK