Double Rainbow Society

[General Mojo]

so just because something isnt prohibited by CC, that automatically makes it not childish? Nice logic there, chief...


and lord voldemort, I would love nothing more than for you and your clan buddies to do that. Thats kinda been my whole point re: all of you tough guys putting the DRS on ignore...

[lord voldemort]

well its in a month
and a simple investigative work by the right people wont do u any harm...why so worried??

[trapyoung]

you wanna play us & put us in our place here you go

2615724
2615729
2615734
2615739
2615741
2615742
2615746
2615750

pm me if you want the password, as a heads up these games our trips & quads & since i'm going to be on the same team w/ ppl like mojo & siedshow i'd like to announce we have an alliance

[spaceghst44]

You know what I think is funny. I have never played with or against the guy who started the "bounty". all these people calling me a douchechill, whatever in the f*ck that is, maybe your third grade education allows you to make up words, I have never playd them either. Way to go guys, singling out a guy who you have never played with or against and calling him names on the internet. awsome. can I come over to your house for brownies after your next meeting?

[trapyoung]

oh so like you said we haven't played you? so where are all these secret alliances? this entire thread is ridiculous, move it to flame wars or callouts and get it over with

[Bones2484]

For the record, they're (in order) red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo & violent.

fixed

tell me that wasnt funny

Ok. It wasn't funny.

[trapyoung]

Ok. It wasn't funny.

well that's becuase you're obviously gay

[AndyDufresne]

Lets all play nice now, or I'll have to start peeling some bananas!


--Andy

[Anarkistsdream]

well, correct me if im wrong but doesnt the form provide an area to list games where you provide game #'s of instances of the accused abuse? you guys havent listed any b/c there aren't any and you wont find any so thanks for playing, see you at harry potter convention soon

We don't have to list any...

Look, bro... You guys are telling people that you'll give them something that they normally wouldn't have received if they pick on one single player on this whole site.

That is wrong. Pure and simple.

Hence, journalists can't say, "I'll pay you $100,000 to break into the police station and gather evidence for us about the corruption."

Or teachers can't say, "Whoever tattles on the kid who shit on my desk gets a free A in the class."

I can keep making these up, if you'd like.

The point is, what you are doing is wrong and should not be allowed.

[trapyoung]

id like to see a few more examples, i think i'm starting to understand

[Anarkistsdream]

id like to see a few more examples, i think i'm starting to understand

Here's a great one for you.

A football coach says, "I'll let ANYONE on the team, no matter how bad. We are doing this because a rival team stole our mascot. Anybody who does something WORSE to that team will automatically be placed on the roster."

Not very fair.

Imagine if this were used on things like the police department.

"We are letting ANYONE be a police officer, as long as you give this person a ticket everyday."

[trapyoung]

so its wrong to use incentives to manipulate individuals for one's personal gain or self satisfaction, my god, what have we done

[Anarkistsdream]

so its wrong to use incentives to manipulate individuals for one's personal gain or self satisfaction, my god, what have we done

Your sarcasm is as thick as my grandmas homemade syrup.

[General Mojo]

or like when the PGA gives a golfer entry into all the majors for the next X amount of years regardless of rank if he wins a major....

or like when the NCAA lets teams into the tournament for winning their conference regardless of their regular season record....


or like when the DRS promises to stop embarassing you if you cease with your ridiculous posts...

[cisco2001]

or like if you're caught cheating in this game; pay $25 and you're back in....

Beat this example!

[Frop]

or like if you're caught cheating in this game; pay $25 and you're back in....

Beat this example!

[hulmey]

DRS, are a fucking scumbag clan that has no place here at Conquer Club!! One of my clan members (QYU) beat there player and DRS issued the same statement. you guys are shit!!

[Siedshow99]

DRS, are a fucking scumbag clan that has no place here at Conquer Club!! One of my clan members (QYU) beat there player and DRS issued the same statement. you guys are shit!!

Hulmey, you are flat out wrong. Read the thread:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=47517

We didn't post it because he beat us, we posted it because he accused us of cheating - something that the DRS doesn't need to do to win. When we do lose, we lose gracefully. Please pull up any games I've ever lost, and read the gamechat. However, when somebody - even your precious clanmate Qyu - accuses us of cheating, we do take offense.

Get your facts straight brah.

[trapyoung]

i'm actually undefeated against qyu

[Torter_of_Worlds]

Double Rainbow Society

General Mojo
SolidOrange7
Stoggieman
Dr. Bombay
PeterClemenza
mcapizzi
Siedshow99
Patertots
Professor Chaos
candlepop
trapyoung
jpeter15
Kitchen Sink
cmess07
ChuckMDeez

The accused are suspected of:

[*]Having a secret alliance

viewtopic.php?f=31&t=52966&p=1373229#p1373229

Recently, a player by the name of spaceghst44 deadbeated a speed game with well-respected Double Rainbow Society (DRS) member mcapizzi. As to be expected, mcapizzi left some negative feedback warning future players of entering into a speed game with a player that has the potential to deadbeat at any moment. Spaceghst44 gave the following response to the feedback:

"deadbeated after three turns in a speed game. rather frustrating to have to sit around and wait 15 minutes to end the game. Also a complete douchebag, as evidenced by his response to this comment.
spaceghst44's response: fine i will change my response. f*ck YOU AND YOUR FRIENDS WHO FIGHT YOUR BATTLES. are you not big enough to do it yourself? complete whiner bitch. You know what is rather frustrating, are people like you who put way to much into a fucking GAME! You cry like your life has been ruined because of a deadbeat. Your life must not be worth shit or the paper you wipe your ass with you fucking little bich."


Accordingly, DRS has temporarily suspended its rigid membership requirements and will welcome into the clan any conquer club member, regardless of rank, who PM's myself or any other DRS member evidence of a game where the player has eliminated Spaceghst44 from the game.

This offer will continue without interruption until Spaceghst44 issues a public apology to mcapizzi and the Double Rainbow Society for his senseless and inappropriate slander of a distinguished DRS member.

DRS 4 Life,

General Mojo

seems that this whole clan encourages collusion between games, encouraging everyone in their clan, and anyone wishing to be a member of their clan to single out players that they do not like. i believe this would fall under the secret alliance rules, however correct me if im wrong.


hwhrhett

I love the irony in this post...please define for me what a secret is and after doing so; tell me how this post made by DRS is a secret.

[lord voldemort]

well actually any alliance entered to before the game starts is gross abuse of the game...

[hulmey]

well actually any alliance entered to before the game starts is gross abuse of the game...

can we have a mod ruling on this pls!! All DRS's statement does is target indiduval players, so that 20 plus people are out to kill them in games (thats if anyone takes there bullshit seriously)!

[FabledIntegral]

I agree with the topic poster. Whether it is against the rules or not, I believe it tarnishes the reputation of a clan to encourage sabotaging games. Basically, the clan is telling its members, or merely asking its members, to not play in one's strategically best interest for the individual game, but to attempt to single out a specific player. Sure players can be douchebags, I'd be considered a douchebag by many considering in the last month I have received twice the amount of negatives than positives (although if you had checked my feedback given, I had given probably negatives in a 7:1 ratio to positives).

However, to enter a game with the specific intention of sabotaging someone else's game is what I'm addressing. Sure you can sabotage that one person's game by suiciding on him (if it's still happening in game). However if you dislike the person - put him on your foe list, don't stalk the person. I'd say what the proposition of the DRS member is significantly more unsportsmanlike than the comment derogatory comments left by sport (or w/e his name is).

[trapyoung]

no one said suicide or sabatoge, all mojo said was show proof of defeating 'x' - could be 1v1, could be team game, could be anything. the post by spaceghst44 on callouts was the first post to bring up an issue of suiciding, stalking, throwing games, and issuing unwarranted negative feedbacks.

also, an alliance is defined as an agreement or cooperative action to achieve a certain goal among two or more individuals. seems to me that for an alliance to actually exist there needs to be two or more people in the game in question working towards this goal. if mojo or any other drs member for that sake was in these games helping take out spaceghst44 or anyone else for that matter, that would be gross abuse and in violation of rule 2, however, that hasn't been the case or there's no indication that would ever be the case.

and all we do is target players? when qyu started accusing us of cheating did we join a bunch of standard games and team up on him? no, we kicked his ass in a variety of triples and quadruples games. we don't join standard matches and throw games and set friends up, we participate in team games with one another and prefer to clobber the shit out of you there.

maybe what mojo did was unsportsmanlike but what spaceghst44 did was just as much a broach of accepted conquer club etiquette. he deadbeat a game, verbally attacked numerous drs members, left retaliatory feedback, falsely implicated numerous members of drs with no basis, and issued a call out setting up a system for throwing games (it's locked in the call out forum but a good read - "bounty on all drs members").

i am really looking forward to a mod ruling to shut most of you up.

[General Mojo]

I believe trap covered it all...only thing i would add is to address lord vordemont's comments, which are clearly off base....a simple hypo illustrates why he is wrong:

Say there are two players that are dying to get into DRS and embark on the same mission of eliminating Spaceghst from a game. They would have NO incentive to ally to knock him out. Why? Because only the guy who actually rolls him out of the game would receive entry into our clan. The other would be left longing for the day when he could sport the glorious colors of the rainbow....if anything, our bounty would create incentive for the two of them to prevent each other from rolling Spaceghst out of the game.


Also, I think something else got lost in all of this. Spaceghst has the option of simply apologizing to us for his clearly inappropriate and egregious behavior (see trap's post regarding the numerous CC rules he broke). That option still stands to date.

And lastly, we wouldn't have to set bounties out if they would just sack up and play us. That actually goes for all of you....quit your whining and join some of the numerous games trap set up and we can settle our differences once and for all