Freedom of Speech

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Freedom of Speech

Post by Juan_Bottom »

APPALACHIAN brought up a good point, how do you really feel about Freedom of Speech? Do you feel so strongly that even NAMBLA has the right to say their peace? Or if they try and speak in your local community will you let them rest in peace?
Do Communists have the right to meet in your local library?
Should people be required to get permits before holding public rallies?

Where do you personally draw the line on Freedom of Speech?
User avatar
GabonX
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by GabonX »

Most people, including the establishment at this site, draw the line at racism.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by MeDeFe »

Commies are ok, they're red, just like the Republicans. FOS only ends when you start promoting hatred or violence towards others.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Juan_Bottom »

I guess that I should answer my own question.

Permits are unconstitutional, and I hate them. They are unconstitutional, because they can be denied. Thus denying Freedom of Speech.

I am soooo liberal that I think anyone, even Christians, should be able to meet and speak freely.

But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.

I think that Freedom of Speech should be situational, in private areas, like CC.

But I am very pro-Freedom of Speech.
User avatar
Bertros Bertros
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:30 am
Location: Riding the wave of mediocrity

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Bertros Bertros »

Juan_Bottom wrote:But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.


Would you be wearing a tight shirt, chaps and a cowboy hat when you did that?
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Snorri1234 »

MeDeFe wrote:FOS only ends when you start promoting hatred or violence towards others.


I don't know. Stopping at that leaves too much room for interpretation for my liking. What's "promoting violence"? Is it a post by Nappy saying the banlieus in paris should be bombed? Or is the limit reserved for public speeches with large audiences?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by MeDeFe »

Snorri1234 wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:FOS only ends when you start promoting hatred or violence towards others.

I don't know. Stopping at that leaves too much room for interpretation for my liking. What's "promoting violence"? Is it a post by Nappy saying the banlieus in paris should be bombed? Or is the limit reserved for public speeches with large audiences?

Point taken, I'll think about it.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
DaGip
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by DaGip »

Juan_Bottom wrote:APPALACHIAN brought up a good point, how do you really feel about Freedom of Speech? Do you feel so strongly that even NAMBLA has the right to say their peace? Or if they try and speak in your local community will you let them rest in peace?
Do Communists have the right to meet in your local library?
Should people be required to get permits before holding public rallies?

Where do you personally draw the line on Freedom of Speech?


I think we need to draw the line of asking state governors about the phony central banking system that is looting trillions of honest hardworking taxpayers money. Such questions need to be handled harshly, and the questioner arrested immediately, all the while the camera man gets roughed up. Freedom of Speech needs to be revoked, it would make all our lives so much easier. We could all wave little American Flags and join up for some good ol' puppy killin', baby bombin' fun! YEEHAW! WHOOOPEEE! WAHOO! SHOOT 'EM UP! WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE! TOUCHDOWN! GO JOE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoyn_doplUM
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by suggs »

Juan_Bottom wrote:I guess that I should answer my own question.

Permits are unconstitutional, and I hate them. They are unconstitutional, because they can be denied. Thus denying Freedom of Speech.

I am soooo liberal that I think anyone, even Christians, should be able to meet and speak freely.

But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.

I think that Freedom of Speech should be situational, in private areas, like CC.

But I am very pro-Freedom of Speech.
Last edited by suggs on Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by wicked »

umm suggs? not FW bud.
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by suggs »

Bugger.
Sorry.
Ok, i withdraw the personal attack.

But anyone, in general terms, naming no names, and peace and love to everyone who has posted on this thread, who would like to smash a truck into people because of the way they are born, is a *insert derogatory comment of your choice*

Better? ;) :)
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by jonesthecurl »

suggs wrote:Bugger.
Sorry.
Ok, i withdraw the personal attack.

But anyone, in general terms, naming no names, and peace and love to everyone who has posted on this thread, who would like to smash a truck into people because of the way they are born, is a *insert derogatory comment of your choice*

Better? ;) :)


Thank goodness it isn't personal. :-^
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by InkL0sed »

suggs wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:I guess that I should answer my own question.

Permits are unconstitutional, and I hate them. They are unconstitutional, because they can be denied. Thus denying Freedom of Speech.

I am soooo liberal that I think anyone, even Christians, should be able to meet and speak freely.

But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.

I think that Freedom of Speech should be situational, in private areas, like CC.

But I am very pro-Freedom of Speech.


Then you are a bigoted, homophobic twat.
I assume you draw the line at hating black people?
So why is it OK to hate gay people?
The answer is: ITS NOT.
I despise you.


Suggs -- Man-Boy Love. Not Man-Man love. Big difference.

Honestly suggs, sometimes you don't seem to read posts quite carefully enough...
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by suggs »

:oops: hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by joecoolfrog »

suggs wrote::oops: hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.


It would appear to be a pedophile organisation so time for the dunces hat and an extended
perusal of one corner of the room.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Juan_Bottom »

suggs wrote:Bugger.
Sorry.
Ok, i withdraw the personal attack.

But anyone, in general terms, naming no names, and peace and love to everyone who has posted on this thread, who would like to smash a truck into people because of the way they are born, is a *insert derogatory comment of your choice*

Better? ;) :)


NAMBLA wants to legalize sex with children. Sex between grown men and pre-pubescent boys. I don't have a problem with any homosexual. In fact, I am pro-gay marraige too. And I hope that all homosexuals can have their fill of warm butt-love, or boobie tugging, whatever they want. But adults and children????? Come on.....
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Snorri1234 »

suggs wrote::oops: hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.


We don't have to worry about what he thinks of it, my dear.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Nickbaldwin
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:07 am
Location: Scut hole near Birmingham

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Nickbaldwin »

suggs wrote::oops: hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.


suggs I'm not 16.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
danvoy9787
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:03 pm

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by danvoy9787 »

I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Snorri1234 »

danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.



It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.

Yeah treason dude. Totally.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
DaGip
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by DaGip »

Snorri1234 wrote:
danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.



It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.

Yeah treason dude. Totally.


This is so fucking disrespectful...this person needs to be shot immediately! I hate this kind of treasonous shit!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-FvgmAbiCA
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by Snorri1234 »

DaGip wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.



It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.

Yeah treason dude. Totally.


This is so fucking disrespectful...this person needs to be shot immediately! I hate this kind of treasonous shit!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-FvgmAbiCA


Word!
Let's outlaw the very thing the nation was build upon! Let's be a bunch of utter dicks by telling people what they can and can't do which doesn't harm anyone.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
DaGip
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by DaGip »

Snorri1234 wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.



It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.

Yeah treason dude. Totally.


This is so fucking disrespectful...this person needs to be shot immediately! I hate this kind of treasonous shit!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-FvgmAbiCA


Word!
Let's outlaw the very thing the nation was build upon! Let's be a bunch of utter dicks by telling people what they can and can't do which doesn't harm anyone.


This is the most awesome fucking patriotic video clip EVER!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48kCjqbZRz0
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
brooksieb
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:44 pm

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by brooksieb »

Yeah i hope pedophiles become the captive 1s in the showers

With a man named tiny, he's 300 lb and he's gonna' butplumb you in the showers.
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Re: Freedom of Speech

Post by suggs »

joecoolfrog wrote:
suggs wrote::oops: hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.


It would appear to be a pedophile organisation so time for the dunces hat and an extended
perusal of one corner of the room.



So I didn't read the post properly. BIG FUCKING WHOP.
And you didn't read mine, in which i said i was making a more general comment on suspected homophobia on the part of Juan. As you clearly have no ability to form beliefs and opinions based on prior evidence, you may take your Dunce's hat, and fold it neatly into your ass.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”